@guardian_of_gravity: without providing any serious calculations or actual quantatization or analysis of feats other than "Legendary Godzilla is bad".
.
.
Really? Cuz I guess owning you on literally every point of the movie by blatantly correcting you....what, it didn't happen? Cuz um I was there.
None of your corrections were of any substance or showed any serious efforts at quantizing feats rather than simply dismissing arguments out of hand because you found them to be inconvenient to your thesis.
Anyway I didn't see your prior post, which was just speculation and size calcs. They never tried blowing up a city to destroy the MUTOs, so you cannot say they can do the same.
Yes, you can based on the munitions utilized to kill them. Cloverfield was felled by bunker buster munitions as part of the hammer down protocol, each of which typically outputs less than a ton of TNT's worth of explosive force and primarily relies on penetrative force via massive drop weight.
Gypsy also tanked a nuke. A bigger nuke. Yet it got destroyed by a standing blow from Knife head. Resisting a nuke doesn't equate to combat durability. Godzilla tanked a nuke, then was held down by a monster 1/3 his size as it beat him up. The same monster that died against a building.
Godzilla withstood the Castle Bravo Nuclear warhead, which is known to have detonated with the force of 15 megatons, or roughly an order of magnitude more than what Gypsy danger withstood. Gypsy Danger was also over a kilometre away. Your argument is spurious at best and outright fallacious at worst.
Your size calcs are off. This Godzilla is 350-450 feet and has no official weight. Clover is about 300 feet, and there's ten of them.
Godzilla's official size is incongruent with what is actually observed by comparing him to known factors such as the Golden gate Bridge. Judging by him standing near the bridge which stands 250+ feet above the water, and has several dozen more feet of depth before we factor in how tall he was next to the towers, we can comfortably estimate his height to around 800 feet, which is not directly contradicted by him standing next to any other known buildings. Cloverfield also only masses in at 8,000 tons.
Comparing heights to the 20,000 ton and 50 metre tall Showa Godzilla would, as per the square cube law; give us a mass 116 times greater. Being more fair and comparing it to Final Wars Godzilla who has a mass of 55,000 tons gives us a mass more in the ballpark of 15 or so times greater. This gives us a mass of 797,000 tons, or one hundred times that of Cloverfield's mass of 7,800 tons.
This is consistent with Godzilla displacing enough water to cause a massive Tsunami via exiting the pacific ocean, and is also consistent with him displacing a Nimitz class aircraft carrier and multiple destroyers. Which we can also use as a reference for his size. Simply put, Cloverfield is far too small.
Also even an idiot can tell my typos are due to a phone. Who spells "this" as "thus" on purpose? Lmao just another example of poor reasoning ability.
Thus is common language in higher academia and prose writing. Typing on a phone is no excuse for poor typography. Nor is there ever an excuse to use chatspeak in a debate setting. If you wish to be taken seriously, use proper and formal English. This isn't Tumblr.
Idk why you keep referencing other godzilla movies. All of these Godzillas can bust entire city streets with their breath, this one didn't bust a single building and had less range than Godzilla is long. GxMG? GMK? FW? What in god's name makes you think there is ANYcomparison to the levels of power displayed in those movies? There is literally nothing at all even close. This is stupid. Talking to you is stupid. You're literally pulling things out your arose and ignoring the big picture:
Again an example of not providing any counter-argument besides an anger filled rant. Godzilla did not use his breath on any structure nor utilized them at long range as this incarnation of Godzilla outright ignored humanity so that he could put more focus on destroying rival predators and was always in a very close quarters situation. You do not address any arguments and simply wave them away.
Godzilla got held down by a building level monster, beat up as soon as he lost the 1v1 advantage, and showed no ability to deal with multiple attackers. Clover is largely superior to the Mutos because it won't die when smashed on a building lol buildings fell on it n it was fine. You cannot undermine "enough firepower to destroy Manhattan", it doesn't matter if the used firecrackers. Its a city level explosion. MUTOS tanked nothing close.
You are arguing in the face of the Cloverfield monster being killed by Bunker Buster munitions while the Masculine Muto was only felled by being hit with a supersonic tail swung by a 797,000 ton monster. Assuming only 1/10th of his body mass is placed behind this impact and he is only just barely breaching the sound barrier at 340 M/S, which is a very conservative estimate based on how quickly he was able to move his tail relative to his size (as a point of Comparison, Devastator in Revenge of the Fallen would be moving his fists at 200 miles per hour to move his fists at his punching speeds, whereas Godzilla is both far larger and swinging his tail faster) we get a kinetic energy output of 4,566,200,000,000 joules
This is the equivalent of a 1091.35 Ton bomb. So the Male Muto was slain by the force of a one kiloton bomb all concentrated into the area of Godzilla's tail slamming into it and then impaling it on metal girders. Whereas the Cloverfield Monster was slain by concentrated bombardment from precision guided munitions; which did not level manhattan as many claim; but rather flattened an area around central park. The military reserved the usage of these thermobaric warheads until it was over Central Park to minimize collateral damage. It only leveled most of Manhattan because the military refused to deploy bunker buster munitions until it was out of a densely populated area.
There is no reason in your logic, just rationalizing and excuses).
Log in to comment