Gambit vs Ultimate Hawkeye

They start 15 ft. away from each other. Fight takes place on the rooftops of New Orleans. Fight is to KO. Morals on. Gambit has his bo staff and 4 decks of cards. Hawkeye has a Desert Eagle, his bow, and arrows. 

Gambit.

Gambit.

I'd say gambit given this setup - 15 ft is damn close, which really takes away Hawkeye's real advantage over G which is his accuracy from a distance, and I think Gambit has shown slightly better reaction time which would give him the edge.  Definitely agree with RisingBean tho, this is damn close.

Gambit will win.

Gambit.

Gambit

R.I.P. Gambit.

Ult. Hawkeye wins.

Hawkeye but I could see this going either way

Gambit. 
 
Environment is in his favor for Gambit. In my opinion, Gambit also has the faster "quick draw" when it comes to weaponry, his cards being far easier and lighter than a bow set up and aim and a upholstering of a desert eagle, aim, and fire. His cards are lighter, he's accurate with them but doesn't need to be absolutely precise with the explosive power. But that don't mean he can just throw them, but he does that anyway sense that's what his accuracy proficiency intends to be. The bow and arrow, Hawkeye has to set up, he does it fast but is it faster than Gambit throwing a card? Does lifting up a desert eagle, also depending if it's holstered at hip or under arm, than taking aim faster than Gambit throwing his cards, and can Hawkeye fire off enough rounds compared to Gambit throwing multiple cards? I think Hawkeye will be doing the dodging first, before Gambit. From there, I think Gambit will make use of his terrain and have the battle from there on.   
 
I'm not implying Hawkeye is slow here. I'm simply saying their weaponry's weight and set up make a slight difference enough to make it a slim but deciding factor for when it comes to who can pull off an attack first when meeting.
 
It's no easy fight, but the favor of the fight for me leans to Gambit. Does anyone else have an opinion for Hawkeye in response to my reply? I would love to hear it (no sarcasm), cause I like both characters and would like to see Hawkeye be defended.

Gambit.  Environment is in his favor for Gambit. In my opinion, Gambit also has the faster "quick draw" when it comes to weaponry, his cards being far easier and lighter than a bow set up and aim and a upholstering of a desert eagle, aim, and fire. His cards are lighter, he's accurate with them but doesn't need to be absolutely precise with the explosive power. But that don't mean he can just throw them, but he does that anyway sense that's what his accuracy proficiency intends to be. The bow and arrow, Hawkeye has to set up, he does it fast but is it faster than Gambit throwing a card? Does lifting up a desert eagle, also depending if it's holstered at hip or under arm, than taking aim faster than Gambit throwing his cards, and can Hawkeye fire off enough rounds compared to Gambit throwing multiple cards? I think Hawkeye will be doing the dodging first, before Gambit. From there, I think Gambit will make use of his terrain and have the battle from there on.    I'm not implying Hawkeye is slow here. I'm simply saying their weaponry's weight and set up make a slight difference enough to make it a slim but deciding factor for when it comes to who can pull off an attack first when meeting. It's no easy fight, but the favor of the fight for me leans to Gambit. Does anyone else have an opinion for Hawkeye in response to my reply? I would love to hear it (no sarcasm), cause I like both characters and would like to see Hawkeye be defended.

It really just seems like an Ol' Western gunfight. And with their skills, it's whoever draws first that wins. And as suiken_seiji points out quite accurately, Gambit has the advantage. Plus, Gambit probably has a few cards up his sleeve (literally) for emergency drawing, given his line of work.

Gambit. 

i would pay to see this battle. 

R.I.P. Gambit.

Ult. Hawkeye wins.

Gambit

@Sega_Shaman:  If Gambit survived the initial encounter, and was fighting to kill as Hawkeye would be, I do think the odds increase greatly in his favor. He does use area effect weapons and his agility is quite good as you noted. The reason I wanted to note the difference between aim dodger and bullet dodger is some folks will argue the latter. I've noticed it on a few threads (Batgirl is the one that comes right to mind) and wanted to ensure that people didn't start thinking that Gambit could literally outrun bullets.  I still would have to say though, that hitting somebody fifteen feet away with a Desert Eagle is not going to be hard. Ult Hawkeye has tagged and beaten Ult Spider-man who is also reasonably agile. The setup leads me to believe that it comes down to reflexes and either one of these guys should be able to pull it off.

gambit...

Gambit

R.I.P. Gambit.

Ult. Hawkeye wins.

@RisingBean said:

I think they both lose. Neither will miss at this range, and both attacks are fatal at whim. Hawkeye kills Gambit and depending on his moral standing on the day of the fight, Gambit either K.O.'s or kills Hawkeye.

double KO.. i think i like this idea :)