• 74 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#1 Posted by Nessy (569 posts) - - Show Bio

Remember, Galactus has never been fully fed.

Fight to the Death, no BFR.

#2 Posted by The_Lunact_And_Manic (3286 posts) - - Show Bio

Starving Galactus stomps.

#3 Posted by randumo24 (4654 posts) - - Show Bio
#4 Posted by RedheadedAtrocitus (6885 posts) - - Show Bio

#5 Posted by joewell (6365 posts) - - Show Bio

@randumo24 said:

@Nessy: why?

#6 Posted by Nessy (569 posts) - - Show Bio

@joewell said:

@Nessy: why?

Well if you're thinking fully fed Galactus wins, how can you be certain, since he has no feats?

#7 Posted by Nefarious (20340 posts) - - Show Bio
@RedheadedAtrocitus said:

My exact reaction. 
#8 Posted by YourNeighborhoodComicGeek (20245 posts) - - Show Bio

Please refer to the Battle forum rules.

#9 Posted by The_Lunact_And_Manic (3286 posts) - - Show Bio

That's not a Fail topic..

#10 Posted by Nessy (569 posts) - - Show Bio

For every feat that is posted for fully fed galactus, i'll post a starving galactus feat.

#11 Posted by joewell (6365 posts) - - Show Bio

@Nessy: It called using common sense

#12 Posted by RedheadedAtrocitus (6885 posts) - - Show Bio

@YourNeighborhoodComicGeek said:

Please refer to the Battle forum rules.

This.

@joewell said:

@Nessy: It called using common sense

And this.

#13 Posted by KaioKen (220 posts) - - Show Bio

What if the Fully Fed Galactus had Boots of Speed and Blessed +3 fixed greased silver dragon scale mail?

#14 Posted by Nessy (569 posts) - - Show Bio

@RedheadedAtrocitus said:

@YourNeighborhoodComicGeek said:

Please refer to the Battle forum rules.

This.

@joewell said:

@Nessy: It called using common sense

And this.

I am using the battle forum rules, common sense dictates that starving galactus wins in a stomp.

If anything this thread should be closed because of how easily starving galactus stomps fed galactus.

#15 Posted by KaioKen (220 posts) - - Show Bio

Also are battles not won on feats alone on the battle forums?

#16 Posted by randumo24 (4654 posts) - - Show Bio

@KaioKen said:

Also are battles not won on feats alone on the battle forums?

This.

#17 Posted by KaioKen (220 posts) - - Show Bio

@randumo24 said:

@KaioKen said:

Also are battles not won on feats alone on the battle forums?

This.

This.

#18 Posted by Nessy (569 posts) - - Show Bio

@KaioKen said:

@randumo24 said:

@KaioKen said:

Also are battles not won on feats alone on the battle forums?

This.

This.

This.

#19 Edited by fondofpacman (572 posts) - - Show Bio

@Nessy: I think I get where you're going...a starving G would win since he has feats and fully-fed doesn't? Is that a comicvine Battles Forum rule you're protesting against with this thread?

Regardless, I'd say that, when one character in a battle lacks feats, that it should just increase the chances of an inconclusive battle decision instead of a default win for the one character with established feats...I think there are probably enough people who ignore the rules to undermine that logic oversight.

[Edit, nevermind, I started writing this before you more explicitly eluded to the purpose of the battle]

#20 Posted by BossMan404 (137 posts) - - Show Bio

Let's see

We have the EXACT same Galactus, just one is max power and one is little power.

Therefore whatever feats Galactus has shown us, he can replicate and do more at 100% power.

Your thread is bad and you should feel bad.

#21 Posted by XImpossibruX (5174 posts) - - Show Bio

@BossMan404 said:

Let's see

We have the EXACT same Galactus, just one is max power and one is little power.

Therefore whatever feats Galactus has shown us, he can replicate and do more at 100% power.

Your thread is bad and you should feel bad.

Wow that was actually intelligent.

#22 Posted by BigCimmerian (8308 posts) - - Show Bio

What is fully fed Galactus? I think that Galactus was at full power when he was controled by Franklin to battle Celestials.

#23 Posted by pooty (11147 posts) - - Show Bio

@Nessy said:

@RedheadedAtrocitus said:

@YourNeighborhoodComicGeek said:

Please refer to the Battle forum rules.

This.

@joewell said:

@Nessy: It called using common sense

And this.

I am using the battle forum rules, common sense dictates that starving galactus wins in a stomp.

If anything this thread should be closed because of how easily starving galactus stomps fed galactus.

If you already know it's a stomp then it is against forum rules to make this thread.

#24 Posted by XImpossibruX (5174 posts) - - Show Bio

This is what comicvine is coming to.....

#25 Posted by minigunman123 (3116 posts) - - Show Bio

I can't find an image detailing my feelings on this thread.

It's a combination of a snort of derision, a chuckle, a perturbed look of dismay, and a disturbed look of disbelief all rolled into one.

#26 Posted by KaioKen (220 posts) - - Show Bio

If i give you 2 people, person A has no feats while person B can destroy planets. Who wins? Person B of course.

#27 Posted by Nessy (569 posts) - - Show Bio

@BossMan404 said:

Let's see

We have the EXACT same Galactus, just one is max power and one is little power.

Therefore whatever feats Galactus has shown us, he can replicate and do more at 100% power.

Your thread is bad and you should feel bad.

You are making the assumption that Galactus doesn't reach his peak power at 99%, and suddenly become useless with 100% power to the point where it is too much for him to control, and thus is weaker than a human? Interesting, i'd like to see feats of this.

#28 Posted by fondofpacman (572 posts) - - Show Bio

@minigunman123: I'm guessing you wanted to use the word perturbed twice in that sentence, but settled with disturbed at the end there to keep from using the word twice.

#29 Posted by BossMan404 (137 posts) - - Show Bio

@KaioKen said:

If i give you 2 people, person A has no feats while person B can destroy planets. Who wins? Person B of course.

They are the exact same person so have the same feats, just one is max power while the other has little power.

Thus destroying your entire thread, and whatever trolling you are trying to do here.

Have a nice day.

#30 Posted by jeanroygrant (20191 posts) - - Show Bio

@RedheadedAtrocitus said:

#31 Posted by RedLanternSuperman (348 posts) - - Show Bio

@BossMan404 said:

@KaioKen said:

If i give you 2 people, person A has no feats while person B can destroy planets. Who wins? Person B of course.

They are the exact same person so have the same feats, just one is max power while the other has little power.

Thus destroying your entire thread, and whatever trolling you are trying to do here.

Have a nice day.

lol pwned.

/thread

#32 Posted by XImpossibruX (5174 posts) - - Show Bio

@RedLanternSuperman said:

@BossMan404 said:

@KaioKen said:

If i give you 2 people, person A has no feats while person B can destroy planets. Who wins? Person B of course.

They are the exact same person so have the same feats, just one is max power while the other has little power.

Thus destroying your entire thread, and whatever trolling you are trying to do here.

Have a nice day.

lol pwned.

/thread

#33 Posted by Nessy (569 posts) - - Show Bio

@XImpossibruX said:

@RedLanternSuperman said:

@BossMan404 said:

@KaioKen said:

If i give you 2 people, person A has no feats while person B can destroy planets. Who wins? Person B of course.

They are the exact same person so have the same feats, just one is max power while the other has little power.

Thus destroying your entire thread, and whatever trolling you are trying to do here.

Have a nice day.

lol pwned.

/thread

You need feats to prove that Galactus doesn't die at 100% power.

#34 Posted by fondofpacman (572 posts) - - Show Bio

Starving G FTW, he survived a hit from Odin.

#35 Posted by KaioKen (220 posts) - - Show Bio

@fondofpacman said:

Starving G FTW, he survived a hit from Odin.

He also isn't brain dead or spontaneously combustive as FP G may well be.

#36 Posted by Nessy (569 posts) - - Show Bio

right so we all agree, starving galactus wins? How do we close one of these things then

#37 Posted by joewell (6365 posts) - - Show Bio

@Nessy said:

right so we all agree, starving galactus wins? How do we close one of these things then

no

#38 Posted by RedLanternSuperman (348 posts) - - Show Bio

@Nessy said:

right so we all agree, starving galactus wins? How do we close one of these things then

no. no one agrees.

#39 Posted by BossMan404 (137 posts) - - Show Bio

@Nessy said:

right so we all agree, starving galactus wins? How do we close one of these things then

You aren't funny or proving anything.

5$ you are gonna try to brag to people you convinced CV that starving Galactus can beat 100%

#40 Posted by Nessy (569 posts) - - Show Bio

@RedLanternSuperman said:

@Nessy said:

right so we all agree, starving galactus wins? How do we close one of these things then

no. no one agrees.

clearly kaioken and fondofpacman does, and haven't heard any feats for FP big G so it seems pretty open-shut to me.

#41 Posted by KaioKen (220 posts) - - Show Bio

@RedLanternSuperman said:

@Nessy said:

right so we all agree, starving galactus wins? How do we close one of these things then

no. no one agrees.

I agree... are you calling me no one? are you calling me nobody?

#42 Posted by The_Lunact_And_Manic (3286 posts) - - Show Bio

@KaioKen said:

@RedLanternSuperman said:

@Nessy said:

right so we all agree, starving galactus wins? How do we close one of these things then

no. no one agrees.

I agree... are you calling me no one? are you calling me nobody?

This

#43 Posted by RedLanternSuperman (348 posts) - - Show Bio

#44 Posted by RedLanternSuperman (348 posts) - - Show Bio

#45 Posted by KaioKen (220 posts) - - Show Bio

@BossMan404 said:

@Nessy said:

right so we all agree, starving galactus wins? How do we close one of these things then

You aren't funny or proving anything.

5$ you are gonna try to brag to people you convinced CV that starving Galactus can beat 100%

Can you show any scans that a fully fed Galactuts can do more than a Starving Galactus? I know when im hungry i move to get food for example, but when I'm fully fed I just sit and don't move, let my food go down sort of thing. also if i were to bet i would bet you ¥2500.

#46 Posted by RedLanternSuperman (348 posts) - - Show Bio

#47 Posted by HBKTimHBK (5242 posts) - - Show Bio

Oh my god...

#48 Posted by fondofpacman (572 posts) - - Show Bio

@BossMan404: Well, I'd put it this way...it's a subversive thread that highlights an oversight (if you can even call it an oversight) in a forum rule, a rule that I wasn't even aware of before this thread to be honest.

Although I'd think that most of ComicVine users are smart enough to ignore this rule in the favor of common sense when needed, I'd be lying if I said I wasn't annoyed by all the users who tell me that Shuma-Gorath loses in a fight with Odin or Galactus because, even though he's been stated on panel to rule "hundreds of dimensions" and makes Mephisto and Satannish look like "mice in a great temple", he lacks feats. But I tend to ignore those guys opinions anyway, especially since most of them are clearly only acting as sticklers to forum rules when it suits them to do so.

#49 Posted by solesamurai (591 posts) - - Show Bio

@Nessy said:

@RedheadedAtrocitus said:

@YourNeighborhoodComicGeek said:

Please refer to the Battle forum rules.

This.

@joewell said:

@Nessy: It called using common sense

And this.

I am using the battle forum rules, common sense dictates that starving galactus wins in a stomp.

If anything this thread should be closed because of how easily starving galactus stomps fed galactus.

You're not even a good troll, you should at least be funny.

#50 Posted by RedLanternSuperman (348 posts) - - Show Bio