Ezio Auditore vs Connor Kenway

Connor at age 19 isn't beating Ezio at 27.

Connor wasn't even a full fleshed out killer at 19.

@dajhonmccloud: idk whats the bleeding effect lol

@jackbensley777: like he gains the ability of the ancestor he experiences. Therefore all three of them in 1

I would have to go with Connor. Although Ezio had a better game, Connor proved to far exceed him in speed, fighting skill, intelligence, and agility. The only thing I disapproved of Connor, was that he was a jerk to Achilles sometimes. Also, aiming a gun and firing at a specific target is much more difficult than shooting a longbow because of the recoil in the gun (I would know I do archery, and have fired a weapon before, while under surveillance). Plus, Connor's assassin outfit is build to handle more against bullets than Ezio's, because weapons are much more common in Connor's time than in Ezio's.

If this was a brotherhood ezio, without talking about revelations, i would side for him.

But AC:2 ezio does not have alot of feats, and surely is less experienced than EOS Connor.I say connor 7/10/with ezio being my favorite assassin, i'm italian lol, and Connor the least one)

@shatiquego582: yeah but hard work and training always surpasses natural talent

Connor wins this. Enzio wins a stealth contest but 1v1? Connor dominates.

@averageman: although I agree that ezio is a more experienced assassin... connor has more advanced weaponry and is quicker... i think connors long bow would be more accurate... but not more powerful... but if you take into consideration that you cant keep fighting with an arrow in your shoulder but you can keep fighting with a tiny peice of roundshot in your shoulder...

Connor pwns Ezio with superior weapons

Guys, Connor was 19 in AC3. He would be more wiser when he is older because some people can be naive at age 19.

Connor Kenway outdoes Ezio in all aspects except skill.

I am so happy that people are actually acknowledging Connor's skills over his popularity.

Connor in a fight. Ezio in everything else (better games, better as a character, had the hoes, had more impact in AC lore, etc...)

P.S. AC3 was terrible and Connor is one of the worst video game protagonists ever.

Ezio probably , since we never saw him get bested in combat .

Ezio was the better assassin. He had better stealth, better precision, could hide better, etc. But Connor was an absolute beast in combat. He was freakishly strong, fast and had some pretty sweet moves. And, in line with his heritage, he was an excellent tracker. So he could arguably be one of the few who would be able to track down where Ezio was hiding before he could strike.

Ezio.

Connor gets murked under these stipulations.

I just finished AC3 and I'm safe to say that Ezio wins.

I hope you guys are kidding. Connor went to Achilles and started training at the age of 13. By 19, he's already started his work on taking down the master Templars of the Inner Circle. He's been killing trained soldiers of Britain's army on the daily (One of the best armies in the world at that time) and assisting George Washington and the Sons of Liberty. Ezio started his training when he was seventeen, so he's only got 4 years of experience on Connor. Which doesn't make a difference. Connor has actual pistols. Ezio cannot dodge a bullet, and it won't just bounce off of his armor. Connor is also a very good shot with his long bow and has been trained to use it for hunting from a very young age. To see who's the better fighter, just look at the gameplay. Connor is faster, trained in the use of more advanced weapons, has been trained in more complex techniques than what was taught 300 years prior, is obviously stronger, and at this age has been investing a great deal of his time into strategies of warfare, with the assistance he's been lending to the patriots.

Don't be a fanboy. Just because you love your precious Ezio because he's "cool" and whores a lot, doesn't mean he's invincible.

CONNOR!

Connor. Never really liked Ezio

Lol Edward Kenway

Connor wins in a good fight. Just in one game he impressed more than Ezio in three.

I hate Connor. He gets caught and blows the lid off the brotherhood, he complains through the entire game and his goal to save his people failed miserably but in a fight that man is savage. Unpredictable. Ezio fought in a time of honor. Connor is grade A, pure American, guerilla warfare. Man has left Ezio's fighting style behind for a reason. It stopped showing results.

Connor > Ezio

@monsterstomp: Hell no!

@darthaznable:

Ezio > Connor

Fixed.

Lol most overrated AC character ever. But that's just my opinion.

Lol. I like how most of the comments in favour of Connor is based on the fact that people don't like Ezio.

@monsterstomp: Heh, that's one thing I noticed, but people like that should just be ignored, because they've already shown that they won't be persuaded because of their biased. I mean, someone said something along the lines of: "Connor. Never really liked Ezio"

I'm not saying that this is a fact, but something that probably happens most of the time.

I still think Ezio wins.

Ezio.. whay more experience. Plus,you guys are forgetting that Ezio has the hidden gun? If he closes in on Connor he'll simply surprise him and shoot Connor right at his face. Ezio has way better combat experience in comparison with Connor.

@captain_batman_ftw: Me too, given the unfair stipulations.

@monsterstomp: Actually, Connor kills Johnson at the age of 18 and Pitcairn at 19. Just saying.

@synchronized_123: Proof?

Connor stomps

Ezio wins, far more experienced and smarter

@monsterstomp: On mobile so I can't post images. Anyways, the wikipedia and the AC wiki seems to mutually agree on this.

John Pitcairn(died during 1775)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Pitcairn

http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/wiki/John_Pitcairn

William Johnson(Died during 1774)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_William_Johnson,_1st_Baronet

http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/wiki/William_Johnson

And we know Connor was born during 1756.

@synchronized_123: Fair enough. I didn't realize you replied to a 2 and almost a half year comment. Regardless, Ezio was still a much more established killer by the time Connor was 19.

@monsterstomp: Somewhat related, but how good are the Frye twins(Jacob especially) in close quarters combat and taking on multiple opponents compared to the previous assassins?

@synchronized_123: There's a lot of interactive sequences that make the twins look intimidating in hand-to-hand. They beat a guy who was amped by a Piece of Eden.

@monsterstomp: Last question:

So how well would they fare against Connor in h2h individually?

P.s. It was a bit of a let down that Jack managed to effortlessly beat down Jacob. Granted he was in his 40s, Altair and Ezio were still able to do so much more at an even older age.

@synchronized_123: Hard to say. Connor defeated his father after being wounded by cannonball fire.. Moreover, Connor is strong enough to wrestle with bears.

Jack was pretty badass himself.

@monsterstomp: Yeah, but still, Jacob should have at least put up a fight.

Ok, I think I have just found the biggest group of idiots in the universe. Ezio Auditore is much more experienced. Not only that but, he is strategic. conner runs around breaking anything in his way, while Ezio just passes it. Lets just say, that they both were lions, and they were both stalking different groups of prey. Ezio allot of fast and agile buck, conner a bunch of slow, stupid buffalo. ezio would creep up, kill at least 30 before the group even realises it. Conner would just charge in, scare the group, and get speared by some horns. I love both conner and Ezio, but Ezio has proven himself the best assassin the world will ever see. If I had a choice, I would fight conner. Besides, a bullet travels allot faster than an arrow.

I've always thought Connor's strength was a bit exaggerated.I mean even Edward has fought off sharks but nobody really cares about it.This Ezio still has the experience unlike Connor,though if it were revelations Ezio it'd be a stomp imo

@aimless: 13 yo Connor would stomp 17 yo Ezio into the ground, imo. Connor was already capable of duking it out with groups of mercenaries solo, while Ezio got disarmed immediately by a mook guard.

@synchronized_123: Cool but OP says Ezio is 27 years old here,where the bulk of his feats are

@aimless: No? The bulk of his feats are in Brotherhood and Revelations.

I vote for.....

Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad!