DC vs Marvel Science Battle

This isn't a traditional fight

Round One: whose science is more realistic?

Round Two: whose is more effective

@jacthripper: round 1 and round 2 are not battle forum materials. remove round 3 or this gets locked because universe vs universe battles are not allowed.

Doom / Banner / Richards / Stark stomps

Stalemate

Marvel for round 1, second rounds a toss up.

To me,, marvel has always been more science based...

But in terms of being effective, I'd say both of them are equally effective so stalemate.

New 52 for round 1

Marvel for round 2

Round 1 Defoe dc they try and keep it at least semi realistic

Round 2 marvel hands down heck tony stark has better science than anyone in fc let alone reed and doom and that's not mentions thanos and celestial a

...I raise you the Brainiacs (Querl Dox especially), Luthor, Ivo, Morrow, Palmer, Terrific etc...

good day

another "are you a dc fanboy or marvel fanboy" thread in disguise!
STALEMATE

(I hope one day we get Image vs Valiant threads like this)

@fallschirmjager: Be careful what you wish for.

at least it would spice things up a bit. every time I think I've seen a marvel vs dc thread done one way, someone else figures out another way to do it.

1. Ummm, I guess marvel, though neither are exactly the most realistic.
2. I'd say marvel, but DC has some pretty crazy tech as well.

I'd say Marvel is more realistic but Dr. Doom is a thing... so DC

Mister Terrific, Palmer, Lex, Brainiac, 5th dimension imps, Kryptonian tech, Batman

1 DC

2 marvel seems to use more magic

Should have put this in OP: