@shootingnova:
I'm going to say 1 thing. How did Palpatine surpass his master..? He doesn't even know how to make a being from complete force and he never fought him in a fair match he just killed him in his sleep, and claimed he surpassed him. I hate when people like you argue by saying reasonable logic, is irrelevant and not logic at all. If Bane learned from a hollow gram he would have never been able to move a moon which sense Revan started all of these idea's with the force. I'm sure he had more things under his sleave then Bane or Siduois knew about seeing as he's really the source of most of the Sith Lord's power.
I didn't say Revan was invincible I said he's undefeated, while Palpatine was defeated by a dieing sith lord who became a joke compared to his old self. Then he killed his master in his sleep and claimed he surpassed him yet he hasn't done anything close to what his master had achieved. Yoda fought him to a Stand still and Mace literately gave him a pounding. In his era he fought some of the weakest jedi compared to the past when the Jedi were much stronger as a whole. Yoda lived for a 1000years and said his-self that the Jedi has gotten much weaker. There's nothing really proven about Palpatine being the strongest Sith lord ever even the creator contradicted hisself a lot with Starwars. Luke probably said he was the most powerful, because that's the strongest Sith Lord "HE'S EVER FACED". He's only heard rumors of the other one's. However Darth Revan is Legendary in every regard, everyone know's how powerful he was, he destroyed the Republic and brung it back to life. From the outside not from people with connection in high places he did it on his own from the outside, both times. Revans apprentice brung the galaxy under his control, none of Sidious's apprentices managed to come close to doing that, not even Dooku and Darth Vader just made people afraid.
You've honestly proved nothing, you especially didn't prove he was the strongest Sith Lord in the universe you actually further proved my point, the amp that Mace had was nowhere near the amp that Bastila had with star forge, which is MUCH GREATER that Vaapad, and Darth Malak was probably stronger than Dooku plus the star forge.
One -- History showed that Revan was strong willed and able to resist powerful dark energies (such as emitted from Malachor V) as a light user and feed off of dark energies and a dark user.
Two -- Revan knew how Malak fought his style, strengths, and weaknesses.
Three -- The layout of the Star Forge was not unknown to Revan.
Unfortunately Mace has none of those advantages. I cannot not recall history showing Mace being able to resist dark energies emitted from something as powerful as the Star Forge. Remember the Star Forge corrupted a whole race because of the power of the dark energies emitted from it.
I dought Vaapad is the equivalent of the power of a star.
Darth Banes feats are even more incredible then palpatine's seeing as he Destroyed the entire Sith and nearly wiped out all the jedi with just 1 plan. Meaning his stratagies are way better then Sidious.
As for Yoda, Revan was described as the heart of the force and saw beyond the immediate threat that he'd created. He saw that there was a greater threat than what others saw, whilst yoda couldn't even figure out that Palpatine was Darth Sidious. Yoda was the greatest Jedi of his era yes. But an all time second? No not at all. Luke has never seen both sides of the coin. He could never understand the dark side the way that Revan does. Revans knowledge of both sides gives him an extreme advantage over these two amazing Jedi. Not to mention that Revan has never lost a battle either and he also defeated two terentatek single handedly.
1. Obviously there are exceptions to the idea that old jedi are stronger than new ones. But the idea still remains that the older the jedi the stronger. Sidious himself is a representation of this. His clones allowed him to live longer and thus gain more knowledge of the force than his norm life expectancy would allow.
2. Thats not true. He was surprised by Vaders actions and he was not any weaker because he was old. Second that force storm he russerected he did not have complete control over. He admits this himself. How about the Mass shadow generator? Bao-Dur created it but Revan designed the object.
3. Falling to the Darkside and achieving the rank of sith lord and putting the republic as well as the jedi order on the brink of collapse is to different things. Just because you fall to the dark side doesn't mean you know everything about the dark side. Kibh Jeen fell to the darkside, does that make him a master of its properties? No. Revan never made use of electric judgement but he has defeated dark jedi with ability to siphon the life force out of there enemy. When has Luke did that? Luke couldn't even take down a true sith lord without getting extra power.
4. George Lucas has also contradicted himself time and time again. How about we use better arguments than Kreia said this and George Lucas says that hmm?
5.Revan saved the republic as well as the jedi order twice and founded the Second sith empire. The holocrons he created taught Darth Bane what he needed to construct the next sith empire. He also created one of the first assassin droids. (HK-47) Revan is undefeated and a few of the people he has defeated are Bastila (with the power of the star forge), Darth Bandon, and Lord Malak (with the power of the star forge)
Did Luke replace sidious? No. Still not understanding my points. Luke has none of the experience of the dark side as Revan did. Luke has not dwelled in a wound of the force as Revan did. The mass shadow generator was created with revan's intellect and rivals the power of sidious's wormhole. I dont remember a wound in the force being created by force storm.
Bane learned a majority of what he knew about the sith from Revan's holocrons. set. Match. Fights are not governed by force ability, inteligence is required and one persons wide effects on the galaxy. Revan's actions have constantly changed the face of the galaxy, even thousands of years later when his holocrons are discovered. The star forge was the holy grail of darkside power, it fed off of it and produced it. Darkside users gain boosts when there surround by the dark energy. Therefore bastila was that much stronger on the star forge. Bandon was Malak's apprentice. Nuff said. Malak was great and had the power of the star forge combined with the ability to rip the life energy out of anyone. Defeating some that powerful is definitely a feat worthy of putting revan above people such as Bane or Sidious. And just like you said. Sidious has never defeated anyone with that power which is because he cant.
Okay, so if George Lucas says Han Solo can defeat Vader, that means its absolutely true? You can't just say oh the creator says this so its correct and nothing else matters because theres always another side and hes not a god. And george didnt even create Revan so.. yeah.
Taking command of pretty much the entire republic fleet and defeating the mandalorians single-handedly. Stop being so literal with everything. And Being a great tactician does make you better in a 1 0n 1 fight. It means your can access situations quicker and create sufficient responses to attacks and defenses. Revan also privided the means for the destruction of the sith through Darth Bane's might. Has something Palpatine done 3,000 years ago affect the future so greatly? No. and Neither has Luke. For that last part. He fire upon the ship Revan was on and debris crshed on top of him. If luke was in the same position he wouldnt have been able to heal because he would be dead. Not near dead just dead.
This could go anyway. If it came down to light saber duel. Revan would outlast Sidious. There is a problem with newer generation Sith. They were not as battle tested as the Old Republic. The anchient teachings were an everyday thing back in the day which made it easier for Siths a long time ago to learn and master. There were academys back then which taught it all. The teachings today are watered down and harder to come by.
Both were geniuses that had great force potential, and both supposedly mastered both light and dark side powers. I'm more inclined to say that Sidious was smarter, because he managed to manipulate the Republic so well for so long; but Revan was on the verge of completely crushing the republic (as well as on his way to conquering the galaxy) through his sheer cunning and tactical mind. Not to mention it was implied by Kreia that Revan was a necessary evil, purposely donning the guise of Sith lord to lure out the true Sith, making him a double agent; and considering the Sith really wouldn't rise up for another 300 years, kinda makes him more successful in his end goals.
Also your statement with Nihilus is a lie, the exile is the Ying to his Yang no one could resist his life siphoning powers except her or if she was around people. It's not the same as the reaper or Palpatine's kinda like all lighting is not the same and all of them can't be deflected. Nihilus power is the same as that factor nothing can stop it unless your the Exile. If your not the Exile your fate is sealed. Same with the Chosen One regardless of how it went Sidious was going to die to Anakin whether he gained all the power and became the Sith Lord as expected, whether his entire body was broken and his bones depleted, which kinda relates to him being Vader. Even if he was dieing, Sidious end was already in place no matter what. The evidence for this, is the mass amount of force Anakin had as a child, his hand being cut off and him giving a new one, his entire body burned, and needing to rely on a machine to breath. That same machine short circuiting after being doused with lighting, no matter what he was going to die by him.
Revan was such an accomplished individual soldier that the Mandalorians, (who were well on their own way to conquering the Republic) in their fear of him, nicknamed him Revan the Butcher. This was before he sought power as Darth Revan, the time period specified for this discussion. Additionally, as you can see from the holovids, a strike team of 3 Jedi led by Mace Windu was sufficient to subdue Sidious and if not for Darth Vader's intervention he would surely have been destroyed there. Revan was handily defeating 5 Jedi, led by Bastila Shan under the effects of her Battle Meditation and if not for Darth Malak's intervention he would have emerged completely victorious. Revan was physically stronger and faster and was also a master of wielding two lightsabers simultaneously in very aggressive combat.
Sidious has his own strengths over Revan, don't pretend that combat is one of them.
I would only compare Windu to Bastila Shan, and even under Battle Meditation she is not his equal. But with nearly twice as many opponents, who were all seasoned combat veterans under the enhancement of a Force-fueled Battle Meditation... it was definitely a greater overall force than the strike team the defeated Sidious.
However, Yoda was both well past his prime and suffering immensely from the wound in the Force caused by the deaths of the greater part of his Order. Under these circumstances, he isn't really a good judge to go by either.
I am quite certain that there was really no point in Sidious's life where he would have been a match in direct conflict versus Darth Revan. Sidious only defeated his own master through deception and cowardice. He is not a true heir to the Rule of Two. His gifts lie in politics and manipulation, not battle.
(Wouldn't that make Mace Windu the strongest Jedi ever as well? If Anakin hadn't been present he would have beaten the Most Powerful Sith Lord Ever!™ in a duel.)
Besides, most of the Extended Universe (and Sidious own accounts of his own master) would seem to contradict that claim. Though I suppose it depends on how you measure "powerful". Strong in the force? Combat proficiency? Knowledge? Ruthlessness? Political/minipulative skill (power through making others do as you want), ability to actually achieve set goals?
Now hold on just one second Palpatine Fanboys.
First off:
Your talking about the NEC line aren't you?
"Yoda was unable to defeat the most powerful Sith Lord in history."
Hate to break it to you buds. That lines not G-Canon. Its not even C-Canon. KJA didn't even review the line. The line is the authors (Dan Wallace) personal opinion on Palpatines strength.
The NEC is considered a GUIDE to the Chronology. It doesn't create Canon (Therefore its not considered C-Canon). His opinon is S-Canon based, just as much as yours is.
Second Off:
If thats NOT the line, then show me what statement are you talking about? If your gonna argue with Lucas Says then you'd better provide ATLEAST a quote. G-canon isn't G-canon unless you show GL saying it.
I didn't want to de-credit your statement without being absolutely sure. (So I had to wait 1 day to get my Ep. 3 DVD back from my brother.) I watched chapters 20 - 31 with commentary on (3 times at least), and even re-checked the deleted scenes. George never...ever...said Palpa threw the fight. No one did.
In fact...George specifically says in Chapter 27...
(Which is entitled Mace vs Sidious)
"Okay...Well this sequence...uh...Always started out with Mace...Uh >overpowering< Palpatine, and then Palpatine using his powers to try to destroy Mace, and Mace deflecting his rays with his lightsaber. And it always was that Anakin cut the lightsaber out of his hand. But this part (After Palpatine had already been disarmed, and first attempted to shoot force lightning at Mace.) where he, he pretends to lose his power and be weak, was something that I added later." G-Canon
George tells us he was depicting Mace as OVERPOWERING Palpatine.
Debate over. Mace defeated Sidious in combat.
G-Canon over-rides all. Mace is better with a lightsaber than Palpatine.
And to clear things up even further, Yoda didn't lose to Palpatine. IF ANYTHING, it was a DRAW.
Proof:
1. Palpatine TRIED TO RUN from Yoda. PALPA KNEW HE COULDN'T DEFEAT YODA.
2. Palpatine realized that Yoda was his superior in Lightsaber combat early in the duel. He used RANGED combat against Yoda afterwards. (He couldn't do this in his office against Mace)
3. Also note that this is after 66 occurred. Yoda has just finished feeling the loss of at least (guesstamation) 80% of the Jedi of the Order. Including the lives of children, students, and some of his closest friends. As a Jedi, he can't succumb to Fear (Fear of also dying at the hands of Sidious, fear of seeing the end of ALL JEDI.), or Anger (Revenge on Sidious for all the loved ones he had killed.) And therefore despite the fact he was fighting Palpatine he also had to restrain these emotions of Fear and Anger. And may have even FAILED to do so, and therefore was unable to defeat him due to that.
Confirmed (sith) kills for Revan:
- Dark Jedi master on Taris
- Three Dark Jedi
- Bandon
- Bastila (Defeated)
- Malak
Not much, eh? Still, I'd rank him above RotS Palpatine.
Bandon was the second in a Sith Order of thousands. He was probably the second strongest in the Sith Empire, or at least, he'd have incredible potential.
Bastila was more powerful than Bandon.
Malak was the head honcho in a Sith Empire of thousands where the strongest rule. He would likely be very powerful, probably on Mace's or Dooku's level. He also served as the frontline general in a bloody war. He was more powerful than Council members, because he could control the Star Forge when they could not, and he did best Kavar (leader of the Jedi Guardians, one of the best duelists in the Order). Revan took him down when he had his powers amplified by the Star Forge...
Both were geniuses that had great force potential, and both supposedly mastered both light and dark side powers. I'm more inclined to say that Sidious was smarter, because he managed to manipulate the Republic so well for so long; but Revan was on the verge of completely crushing the republic (as well as on his way to conquering the galaxy) through his sheer cunning and tactical mind. Not to mention it was implied by Kreia that Revan was a necessary evil, purposely donning the guise of Sith lord to lure out the true Sith, making him a double agent; and considering the Sith really wouldn't rise up for another 300 years, kinda makes him more successful in his end goals.
The Rakata mentions Revan frying their scout party with a large force storm. They were in awe of his power.
Anyways, citing specific examples isn't the only way to prove one powerful. 5 years later, people wouldn't be like "Whoa, Revan was so pwnzors when he fought Bandon! He picked up a swoop bike and tossed it around like a tennis ball!".
But 5 years later, people like Handmaiden, Mandalore, Kreia, etc. were all in awe of his combat abilities.
He also killed :
Dark Jedi Master on Manan Killed 4 of them on the Leviathan, killed two Sith Head Masters of the Academy on Korriban and killed the Sith Master in the Rakatan Empire who was the third Most Powerful in the entire Empire 1st Malak 2nd Bastila 3rd Sith Master.
the power of force users in the star wars galaxy have greatly diminished due to the fact that there are constant wars and battles. Knowledge is lost. Palpatine derived most of his power from the extremely potent Kyber crystal he wielded.
Judging from the fact that there is a 3,000 year gap between the rule of Marka Ragnos and Reven, concurrently there is a 4,000 year gap between Reven and Sidous. I believe The most powerful force users 4000 years ago greatly surpasses the greatest force user of ROTS.
the people of Revan's time had seen more wars than the PT people. Same for the guys in the "Jedi vs Sith" era. The point is that the Sith and the Jedi were almost exterminated several times.
The Sith:
- after the first shism
- after the great hyperspace war
- after the last battle of Ruusan
The Jedi:
- Jedi Civil War
- last battle of Ruusan
- Jedi Purge
Log in to comment