I'll weigh my opinion.
Malgus is more experienced in combat when compared to Bane.
Bane spent brief time in infantry before being whisked off to Korriban. And when he left for Ruusan, be came into the ass end of a 3? year conflict to wipe out the Sith Order and rebuild it. Ingenious? Absolutely. DId it take a ton of skill to actually pull off? Not really. The Sith Lords of that era were not particularly smart or skilled. There were just tons of them, and almost all of their feats are lower end for Sith.
Malgus is far more experienced in fighting Force Users. He fought Jedi over the course of the Return of the Sith Empire, and spent his time after peace terms were agreed upon either conquering worlds for the Empire, or just straight up killing people he despised (Lord Adraas for starters. Not a high end guy but Malgus slaughters him)
To me Malgus seems like the better duelist. Ven Zallow was the Temple Swordmaster. In a time where the Jedi Order had been geared towards war against Dark Side users, that's gotta count for something. Malgus was able to beat him in a straight up saber fight. He owns Aryn Leneer after a short period, where he simply overpowers her and frys her with Force Lightning.
In the epilouge of Deceived, he breaches Lord Adraas' stronghold, kills everyone in the complex, and owns Lord Adraas with his lightsaber disarming him with no harm to his person, and then strangling him to death with his bare hands.
I just think Malgus would have an edge in lightsaber combat, and hes no slouch when compared to Bane in the Force department either.
Log in to comment