This debate was lackluster if to be honest. I feel like a lot of the debate was lowballing and posting out of context scans. And tbh @sirfizzwhizz if you were debating against a more experienced debater who knew a bit more about Wolverine you would have gotten embarrassed on certain matters (such as durability, speed and your out of context scans). I felt a lot of the speed feats you showed were not very impressive, some were aim dodging and one has predator getting hit by a bullet, i'm not sure what's so impressive about that scan.
Most of your durability scans didn't prove much of anything, tanking explosions wont help him against a clawed foe like Logan. I've noticed that on more than one occasion you've shown durability scans that are out of context to the debate, such as your debate with lunacyde where you threw out a bunch of blunt force durability scans against a team that was coming at you with mainly piercing attacks and deconstruction. In the future try and cite things that actually say something about the fight at hand.
@justicethorpsylocke I feel that you missed out on key counters that could have won you the debate, you really needed to show more for Logan durability wise and you didn't really make an argument as to how the fight would go, you mainly just threw out scans and let them do the talking and they didn't really do much. And like fizz you left out context on certain things, overall you did decent for how new you are but you need to work on some things.
I can't really pick a clear winner, the debate was just overall lackluster and you both really didn't do enough to make you the clear winner in my mind. Not really a draw either, it's just not a debate I really feel I can vote on and I don't feel like either of your arguments were strong enough based on the large amount of things weighing them down.
This post may seem a tad straight forward and harsh but it's truly how I feel about the debate. Take my criticism however you like, and good luck in future debates.
Log in to comment