Superman actually has better morals, he refuses to kill unless he absolutely needs to. Steve killed during WW2. That's why CA was worthy of lifting MJLONIR.
Steve has killed during the war, even if they were fodder nazi's he still did it. Superman would probably cry for about a month if he had to kill nazi's, for taking a human life.
Just because he killed doesn't mean his morals are in question. Not to mention they were vilist scum on the earth in Nazi's who would have no quams about killing. Superman has the powers to take out thousands without killing, Steve has to engage everyone that wants to fight him. I love Superman and am in no way questioning his morals as he really does have a heart of gold, I personally just think Steve Rodgers is the epitome of good character, knows what its like to be the little guy, the underdog, and to be overlooked. I mean im probably in the minority here but I dont care, Steve Rodgers. Superman can win every other battle on comic vine, not this one in my book lol
He may be the Man of Steel but he has a heart of gold. Superman.
Superman has only killed 3 kryptonian criminals, they were bent on destroying millions of lives. He has also killed Doomsday, but that is because Doomsday killed him first.
Captain America's record on dealing with corruption in organizations (and in some cases sussing it out in the first place) is increasingly poor, and is in part why he occasionally ends up doing things like becoming Nomad or the Captain for long stretches of moody disillusionment.
I am not saying he killed for no good reason, but if you were to compare the two, that was the deciding factor for me. He even was all depressed after killing doomsday who seemed like a mindless beast in the new 52.
are we talking about superman in general or a version of superman?
Log in to comment