Captain America & Gambit
vs
TaskMaster & Bullseye
Battle Rules: Morals Off. Win by KO or Death.
Inventory.
Bullseye-Throwing Knives.
Gambit-Standard.
TaskMaster-Standard.
Cap-Standard.
vs
Battle Rules: Morals Off. Win by KO or Death.
Inventory.
Bullseye-Throwing Knives.
Gambit-Standard.
TaskMaster-Standard.
Cap-Standard.
@Floopay said:
@darktiger:
Taskmaster is a team buster, and he's beaten Captain America before. The guy should be pretty much untouchable here, and Bullseye is there, one of Marvel's top marksman...
Thanks for reading,
Floopay
Agreed.
@Floopay said:
@darktiger:
Taskmaster is a team buster, and he's beaten Captain America before. The guy should be pretty much untouchable here, and Bullseye is there, one of Marvel's top marksman...
Thanks for reading,
Floopay
Tasky is human. He is not a legit teambuster. He can match Cap for a short time, but Cap's superior physical abilities, most especially his much superior stamina will get him a win. Gambit is superior to Bullseye physically and can match him for accuracy, so...
Gambit's bullettime speed will allow him to block Bullseye, but what most people don't expect is Gambit's accuracy being able to match him...
@SpeedForceSpider said:
@Floopay said:
@darktiger:
Taskmaster is a team buster, and he's beaten Captain America before. The guy should be pretty much untouchable here, and Bullseye is there, one of Marvel's top marksman...
Thanks for reading,
Floopay
Agreed.
Completely disagree.
Captain America is morals off here for one. Taskmaster and Bullseye don't have a moral tween them as a matter of course. So we're used to seeing them operate as such. And Steve has a bum rap with Taskmaster as his arc is one of the few within which Tasky was actually written well. Morals off though, and Steve would be one scary monster. We've yet to see Tasky face such a Steve.
Gambit morals off could charge in delayed intervals and set them up any number of ways. Not to mention a mere punch would now kill (he can charge organic matter and would not hesitate to do so morals off).
Cap with his shield, Gambit with his superhuman evasiveness and Bo staff make Bullseye damn near irrelevant.
Team one in a very solid majority.
@Super_SoldierXII said:
@SpeedForceSpider said:
@Floopay said:
@darktiger:
Taskmaster is a team buster, and he's beaten Captain America before. The guy should be pretty much untouchable here, and Bullseye is there, one of Marvel's top marksman...
Thanks for reading,
Floopay
Agreed.
Completely disagree.
Captain America is morals off here for one. Taskmaster and Bullseye don't have a moral tween them as a matter of course. So we're used to seeing them operate as such. And Steve has a bum rap with Taskmaster as his arc is one of the few within which Tasky was actually written well. Morals off though, and Steve would be one scary monster. We've yet to see Tasky face such a Steve.
Gambit morals off could charge in delayed intervals and set them up any number of ways. Not to mention a mere punch would now kill (he can charge organic matter and would not hesitate to do so morals off).
Cap with his shield, Gambit with his superhuman evasiveness and Bo staff make Bullseye damn near irrelevant.
Team one in a very solid majority.
Agreed
@Floopay said:
@yodagod:
Taskmaster has beaten Cap already as I recall, and in another instance Cap ran away from the fight and left Taskmaster to Bucky, and Bucky was pretty much going to lose that fight. He's also one upped Iron Man before, and a host of others.
Thanks for reading,
Floopay
Interested in learning about the "host of others" ...
Not saying Taskmaster doesn't belong in a fight with a top tier like Cap or Murdock. He's shown he can win a few and indeed has. But based off cumulative feats, and not just singular showings, he's not yet at the point where I'd give him a majority against a morals off Steve. Context is important when touting who's beaten who. I can show Wolverine getting the upper hand on Iron Man too. But you and I both know that's not enough to convince the deaf dumb and blind Logan actually has a chance straight up. Paladin has also beaten Steve, Luke Cage, Misty Knight and a few other Avengers at once. Then got his arse handed to him right after by Shang Chi. A lot of showings are situational and great examples as to why we give 'majority' wins - understanding completely that such and such a character might rightly take a few, but do they really take a majority, should that really be enough to state they'd win more than lose based off cumulative showings?
I really don't see Taskmaster taking a majority against a morals off Steve all things considered.
@Xanni15 said:
Blocking bullets isn't impressive.
Except when against a guy who's armed with throwing weapons which are significantly slower. Gambit could very conceivably catch, charge, and throw back Lester's projectiles.
And who is that woman, a human?
Yes, she's human. Just like Bullseye. And let's not forget that even on the off chance that he can tag Remy, Gambit can just heal it and keep going. A few scatered cards with time delay charges equals instant mine field. He's as accurate as Bullseye, is faster (arguably), more agile, has more firepower, more weaponry at his disposal, is more versatile, and ultimately more dangerous IMO. Time delay blasts alone make this a Gamby win for me. Not to mention that on top of being a bullettimer, Gambit is wearing a bulletproof costume, with additional armor over it. That limit's Lester's targets. Not that he can't hit Gambit in the eye with a toothpick, or the juggler with a shiruken, but it makes things a little more challenging. And ultimately, Bullsye's bringing knives to a grenade fight, since everything Remy throws explodes with that kind of force, and then some. Not to mention that Gambit and Steve are both superhuman, with superior physical stats and abilities, while their opponents are not.
Gambit can heal any injury he takes from BE or TM. He even did this when he fought Bullseye and got tagged with a sai in the heart. He just healed himself. No big woop.
He can always do this...
only he charges things much much faster and more easily now. Or he could do this...
And these are all normal morality Gambit. Without morals, Remy is scary.
@Super_SoldierXII:
Somehow I missed the "morals off". I probably automatically ignored it because this then becomes unfair. Morals off Gambit easily solo's. Morals off Steve would even have a good chance at a solo IMO.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment