Bournes vs Bonds

Waterloo station in London. Rush hour.

Craig and Brosnan Bonds have 30 min prep at the station. Bournes (Damon and Renner) have no prep and start at opposite ends of the station and meet in the middle. They are not armed. Bournes know they face two agents. Police are a none factor and won't help either team but can have radios and clubs taken.

Round 2: Losing team gets a hungover John McClane with a pack of cigarettes and aspirins. No prep for McClane. He wouldn't use it anyway.

Round 3: Station empty, all armed, and no prep. Opposite ends starting off.

Round 4: Station packed with people. All fight movie Mr. Steve Rogers, without equipment for anyone. No prep for anyone. Start in the middle of station.

Bournes have the H2H skills and I think Bonds have the weapon skills. Or this could just be a really stupid post.

R1: Bourne

R2: Bonds

R3: Bourne

R4: Cap

1. Bourne
2. Bourne
3. Bourne
4. Cap

Bonds all rounds

1. Bourne effortlessly

2. Bourne effortlessly

3. Bourne effortlessly

4. Cap with a bloodied lip

Yep. James Bond is overrated. He's never been able to beat a group of guys in hand-to-hand as effortlessly as Bourne or Cross iirc.

Bournes

Bournes, Never been in impressed by James bond

Bonds really aren't all that great at H2H. They can take guys 1v1, but they hardly ever fight large groups like Bournes.

They could take the shootouts I guess.

Jmarshmallow

Damon solos then gets curb-stomped by Cap

Nobody beats McClane.