@earthquake_2123: Well, I did say that the battle itself had already been decided. Team 2 wins every time.
Clearing some other things:
Obi-wan was able to basically stalemate a Vader who was more powerful than the one he fought on Mustafar.. so i would actually argue that ANH Obi-Wan is at least equal to Dooku and is superior to Maul.
As of ANH, Vader was not more powerful than Anakin. The one Obi-Wan fought on Mustafar was emotionally conflicted and had reached a height of arrogance, which was why Obi-Wan defeated him, not by virtue of skill.
We know from sources such as Lightsabers: A Guide to the Weapons of the Force that Ben Kenobi had been slowed by age and lack of practice, and the latter also contributed to deteriorating dueling altogether.
Conversely, Dooku was never slowed by age thanks to his mastery of the Force. If anything, he remained as fit as a man half his age, according to himself.
As a duelist, Tyranus has defeated/stalemated Windu, defeated Obi-Wan, defeated AotC Anakin, stalemated Anakin during their duel on Tatooine, defeated him on Kadavo (although Anakin was uncomfortable wielding a lightwhip, of course), contended with Skywalker in every other scenario, contended with Yoda, defeated Grievous, stomped Ventress, stalemated Ventress and two of the best Nightsister bladesmen while drugged, beaten Sora Bulq and Tholme, and so on.
Ben Kenobi stalemated Darth Vader, whose feats include defeating Celeste Morne, defeating Roan Shyrne, defeating Ferus Olin, defeating the Dark Woman, defeating five Jedi in simultaneity, and contending with an amped Maul. While impressive, these aren't feats on Dooku's level. Dooku surpasses Kenobi as a duelist, is stronger and faster, has significantly better telekinesis, and has Lightning which could be used in a close proximity.
Log in to comment