Rocket Raccoon shouldn't really be considered a threat. I love him to death but all of his strategy feats are hearsay whereas Nick and Scott have tangible examples of tactical prowess.
As for the fight at hand I'd say it's a very close call but Fury edges out Scott by a hair. Fury has more experience with conventional ground troops than Scott does. Also Fury has certain logistical capabilities for coordinating large scale attacks that Scott might not necessarily have. I personally think that Scott has better strategy and tactical feats than Nick Fury in 616 continuity but given the circumstances of the fight Fury should win.
Rocket's feats aren't hearsay.
He came up with the plan to take down the babel spire in Annihilation: Conquest. It was him and a hand-full of other characters against Ultron and thousands of Phalanx soldiers, but his plan worked.
He's been the leader for the GotG. He is labeled the strategist/demolitions expert for the GotG as well as being second in command.
Rocket Raccoon had a direct part in capturing Thanos, taming a feral Thanos, convincing Thanos to work with the GotG, beating the Cancerverse version of the Defenders, and ending the threat of the Cancerverse.
He was also the head of security on Halfworld for his entire life before joining the GotG.
He planned the attack against the Badoon that were attacking London (I think it was London, somewhere one Earth though).
He planned a strategy with Groot to successfully defeat and trap Star Thief who is an incredibly powerful psychic/telepath. Star Thief is no joke, he could have been a universal threat if he escaped.
He planned the attack on the Universal Church of Truth's main base to rescue Moon Dragon. There were thousands of very powerful UCT cardinals in this. These guys are threats that the Annihilators were called in to deal with because of how powerful they are.
Log in to comment