Strict hand to hand. No Asgardian powers or durability for Thor, this is simply a H2H match. Thor is aware Batman is versed in H2H techniques. Win by KO, morals on. Who wins?
It's depowering, yes, but it had to be done to meet the specifications of this match. And what's with you saying you can't stand fanboys? This is a close match, Thor is versed in thousands of years of Asgardian fighting styles. I take it you didn't know that though, and assumed I was making a spite battle for Batman. Which would be false. Fail.
@ImTheDamnBatman: I would say thor based on his age and he's been trained as a warrior but he has no rwal good specific h2h feats that say he could take on batman, so batman ftw
Batman wins. Thor is good but he's heavily dependent on strength and Mjolnir to win battles. Without Super endurance, super strength or Mjolnir he loses to the Bat. Bruce is no joke and if he was ever morals off it'd be DANGER ZONE haha
So basically your taking away everything that make's Thor who he is so that Batman can win. Screw it I'm giving it to Thor, he's got thousands of years of combat experience against people that render his strength and durability moot any way and Thor will kill so I go with him
i've never seen the point of these type of battles. we dont know the extent of this character's strength when depowered. we can just imagine it. making this battle nul and void.
Thor, no matter how depowered he is, will always have his years of experience over Batman. It doesn't matter how many fighting styles Batman knows, just how he uses those styles in combat at the very instance of using said styles. Thor, on the one hand, has had more than a few centuries to develop his own fighting style, which could very well out-maneuver Batman's. I'm not lowballing any character here, although the winner would be Thor in the end.
Bruce does. Thor has been a brawler for thousands of years, and battles primarily with weaponry. One good showing from back in the day against Cap doesn't change the fact that Thor exhibits little combat skill or intelligence compared to Bruce.
Thor would run home crying to Odin by the time Batman was finished with him ... Although Thor will not forget his embarrassment and when he gets Mjolnir back Batman better be prepared to face up to his actions.
Batman for certain. Thor might have held his own against Cap but against someone like Bruce, he's outmatched. Without his powers, Batman's 127 martial art styles outclass Thor's combat experience.
Bats would win given the fact that he is a more skilled fighter. Even though thor has fought in asgardian martial arts he just seem like the brawler type and believe his size can beat bats. How utterly wrong he would be.
Close...Thor is still very strong even without power... probably bane...as someone said 6'6 and 640 pounds. Batman is 6'2 and 210 pounds. They are almost equal in fighting, I'm giving the edge to Batman though.
For me it´s the problem with most guys with super strength, there is no need for fancy technique if you can punch a hole in reinforced steel....on paper Thor should have a huge advantage in fighting experience but only in one style while Batman is a master of a dozen. So assuming they are physically about equal Batman schould win.
So let me get this straight...you take every thing that makes Thor who he is away..JUST so you can have an excuse for Batman to win..,.PATHETIC!! Btw Captain America would thrash Batman, Deathstroke did it.,,
If this Batman vs Thor and they're on the same level of speed, strength, and endurance.
Then Batman easily. Thor's good but Batman is arguably the best martial artist in comics.
As for Thor beating cap so he could beat bats. DeathBattle did Batman vs Cap. Batman won. He's a better Martial Artist and has superior pressure point knowledge.
I believe Thor would beat batman easily. Even if Thor is powerless, he's very powerful and even though batman is great with his gadgets I don't think it would stop Thor. If powerless Thor could beat Captain America, then he could beat Batman.
Log in to comment