Batman vs Superman

Batman gets 20 years prep and Batman is promoted to immortality.

Who wins?

Lol I don't think batman needs either of those. He would probably do something with kryptonite and be done with it. Like a lucky pair or kryptonite bat chonies.

LMAO. XD

Superman chills in the Sun, while Batman's doing his thing, comes back and completely obliterates him

Superman still wins. Whatever Batman does, Supes can just speedblitz him or beat him from a distance with heat vision.

@ComicStooge said:

Superman still wins. Whatever Batman does, Supes can just speedblitz him or beat him from a distance with heat vision.

What I don't get is, Why do people think Batman can beat Galactus with years of prep, but not Superman? Supermans not even on Silver Surfers level, let alone Galactus.

@RobocopSlayerT800 said:

@ComicStooge said:

Superman still wins. Whatever Batman does, Supes can just speedblitz him or beat him from a distance with heat vision.

What I don't get is, Why do people think Batman can beat Galactus with years of prep, but not Superman? Supermans not even on Silver Surfers level, let alone Galactus.

People are joking when they say Batman can beat him, or they are trolls.

@YoungJustice: it was 100 years prep. You dont think Batman can beat Galactus with 100 years prep even?

@ComicStooge said:

Superman still wins. Whatever Batman does, Supes can just speedblitz him or beat him from a distance with heat vision.

im·mor·tal

/iˈmôrtl/

Adjective

Living forever; never dying or decaying.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Since the OP says Batman has immortality, there is no conceivable thing Superman could do to harm him. He's immortal.

If he were to have an infinite lifespan yet killable by unnatural means, like a vampire, he would be ageless. But he's not ageless, he's immortal. Immune to dying whatsoever. He has the durability of The One Above All, basically.

@xeon1cs:

He could punch him in the head a million times, and it would do nothing. If it hurt him, he would not be immortal. And the OP says he is immortal.

@RobocopSlayerT800 said:

@YoungJustice: it was 100 years prep. You dont think Batman can beat Galactus with 100 years prep even?

No.....Galactus eats Batman..

Batman wins easily.

superman.

@Havenless said:

@ComicStooge said:

Superman still wins. Whatever Batman does, Supes can just speedblitz him or beat him from a distance with heat vision.

im·mor·tal

/iˈmôrtl/

Adjective

Living forever; never dying or decaying.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Since the OP says Batman has immortality, there is no conceivable thing Superman could do to harm him. He's immortal.

If he were to have an infinite lifespan yet killable by unnatural means, like a vampire, he would be ageless. But he's not ageless, he's immortal. Immune to dying whatsoever. He has the durability of The One Above All, basically.

Immortal =/= increased durability. It means: If I cut your head off, you still live. If I give you a 50 million volt shock, you still live. If I give you to some man-eaters, they eat you, but you still live. Ouch.

@PrinceAragorn1:

So if Batman is still kickin', does Superman win? Or is it just stalemate?

@Havenless: Well, wouldn't it be losing via inability to fight?

@Havenless said:

@xeon1cs:

He could punch him in the head a million times, and it would do nothing. If it hurt him, he would not be immortal. And the OP says he is immortal.

Maybe Supes can't kill him...but he can still break every single bone in his body.

@Havenless said:

@PrinceAragorn1:

So if Batman is still kickin', does Superman win? Or is it just stalemate?

Battle isn't to the death.

@Havenless said:

@ComicStooge said:

Superman still wins. Whatever Batman does, Supes can just speedblitz him or beat him from a distance with heat vision.

im·mor·tal

/iˈmôrtl/

Adjective

Living forever; never dying or decaying.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Since the OP says Batman has immortality, there is no conceivable thing Superman could do to harm him. He's immortal.

If he were to have an infinite lifespan yet killable by unnatural means, like a vampire, he would be ageless. But he's not ageless, he's immortal. Immune to dying whatsoever. He has the durability of The One Above All, basically.

That won't prevent him from being KO'd or restrained by Clark.

I cant believe anyone is still debating this. Batman with that much prep will destroy Superman.

Batman said himself that Superman could have crushed him like a bug if he had the right mind to when they fought way back when.

Superman would win. Although batman does have kryptonite, but superman would still win.

@nerdork said:

Immortal =/= increased durability. It means: If I cut your head off, you still live. If I give you a 50 million volt shock, you still live. If I give you to some man-eaters, they eat you, but you still live. Ouch.

in·vul·ner·a·ble (n-vlnr--bl)adj.

1. Immune to attack; impregnable.

2. Impossible to damage, injure, or wound.

Immortal and invulnerable are not the same thing. Elves are immortal in Lord of the Rings, and can live forever, but can be wounded or killed just like a human. Juggernaut is invulnerable and immune to harm, because he has the Gem of Cytorakk.

Well, immortal = no death, right? then elves aren't really immortal. Something like "naturally immortal, artificially killable"

Batman could get his hands on a lantern ring and fine some way of fighting this on a planet with no yellow sun and wins it

Stan Lee wins.

Superman

@Shawnbaby said:

@Havenless said:

@PrinceAragorn1:

So if Batman is still kickin', does Superman win? Or is it just stalemate?

Battle isn't to the death.

Winner can win by Death or KO.

Bat always got a kryptonite in that utility belt ayt?

Oh, and there different opinions about immortality, ok.

Say, olympians and the likes, they are said to be immortal, yet they can be killed.

Unless you say immortality like TOAA.

Batman can't beat Galactus, SS would clap his hands and it's bye bye Bats people should stop putting Batman on SS/Galactus/Gods/ and other characters levels that surpases him in power.Even Wolverine beats him, as for this fight Superman wins.Not sure if they are joking or trolling.

@RobocopSlayerT800: If Richard reeves created that thing that made galactus sh*t his pants then so can batman. I forgot what it's called. And batman wins.

@ComicStooge said:

Superman still wins. Whatever Batman does, Supes can just speedblitz him or beat him from a distance with heat vision.

And can anyone help me out and bump my thread for me:

http://www.comicvine.com/forums/gen-discussion/1/titans-vs-the-defenders/742341/

Thanks

Batman stomps with an upgraded Insider Suit that is encased in magic and kryptonite.

@comicace3 said:

@RobocopSlayerT800: If Richard reeves created that thing that made galactus sh*t his pants then so can batman. I forgot what it's called. And batman wins.

1st, its Richard Reed.

2nd, Its called Ultimate Nullifier

3rd, He didn't event it, it originally belongs to / part of Galactus (Can someone confirm)

I cant believe this is really up for debate. Batman has beaten Supes how many times? No 100 years of prep needed.

^ I think the nullifier is part of Galactus' ship or modeled after but I could also be wrong. 2 does superman know that he will be attacked in 100 years or will he not be expecting it? If he isnt expecting it he dies.

@afueikawa:

1. My bad I am a little off today. It's Reed Richards.

2. Thank you for telling me what it's called

3. Ok but the whole point of my reply is to say batman wins. So umm... yeah...

Just a little opinion on this one:

Bat using kryptonite on Sups isn't gonna work if Sups is in distance, esp. if he's flying. And from above, Sups can just blaze him with eye beams.

But since bat here is given a hundred years prep, he MAY win. So i say 50/50 for now.

IF superman is unaware and allowed to be set up then he gets murderstomped. Batman with 100 years prep and an unsuspecting superman is spite.

@mtrakos said:

I cant believe this is really up for debate. Batman has beaten Supes how many times? No 100 years of prep needed.

it's 20 years of prep and Batmans never beaten Superman in anything canon. it was always cross overs.

@RobocopSlayerT800 said:

@ComicStooge said:

Superman still wins. Whatever Batman does, Supes can just speedblitz him or beat him from a distance with heat vision.

What I don't get is, Why do people think Batman can beat Galactus with years of prep, but not Superman? Supermans not even on Silver Surfers level, let alone Galactus.

Superman is far stronger than Silver Surfer and Galactus, superman is only limited by his humanity, he refuses to gain so much power, because he doesn't just want to help humanity, he also wants to be one, atleast be as close to them as possible.

@ComocYahweh: Lmao. I'd like to see you say that with a strait face, without bursting out in laughter. you SM fanboys never old lol.

Superman is not stronger than Galactus are you high lol. Half fed Galactus one shots superman