Batman vs Sherlock Holmes

  • 60 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for gotwillpower
gotwillpower

718

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By gotwillpower

I've always wanted to see Batman race Sherlock Holmes to solve a mystery. However, Batman's equipment gives him an unfair advantage over Sherlock Holmes, so...

The race will be set some time around 1890. Batman time-travels there somehow. The murder to investigate is the crime from A Study in Scarlet, but I don't think it really matters what mystery they're solving. If you don't want A Study in Scarlet spoiled, you might not want to continue reading.

The investigation is of a man lying in a room, without any exterior injuries or signs of struggle, who is dead on the floor. The word "Rache" is written on the wall in blood, however there are no cuts on the dead man's body. The man has a wedding ring on his person. For more information, search for the book on the internet. It should be somewhere for free, where you can read it as an online text.

Batman doesn't have his utility belt or equipment, only a magnifying glass.

Sherlock Holmes has a magnifying glass.

Who solves the mystery first? Possibly more importantly, who apprehends the killer first?

I'm changing my mind. Originally I said Batman would win. However, this is why I think Holmes would win:

Even though Batman is more knowledgable of everything, Holmes matches his level of knowledge in detection. More importantly, we have proof that Holmes is able to perceive more from a crime scene than most--possibly even more than Batman. In this case, while Batman would likely analyze the body, deduce the cause of death was poison, and then realize that the word "Rache" means revenge, I don't think he would be able to solve the mystery just from that information. He would probably look to question the guard who found the body, and continue from there. On the other hand, Sherlock Holmes (in the book) is able to determine the height of the killer, his appearance, and most importantly, his motive, all from observing the foot prints around the crime scene. Just from this first event in the investigation, Holmes is already farther than Batman.

Batman's downfall is that he isn't able to think "backwards." Holmes explains that that is how he solves mysteries so adeptly. Rather than use a process of elimination (narrowing down possible suspects), he discerns the suspect's traits before ever meeting him.

Avatar image for terminator__fan
TERMINATOR__FAN

160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By TERMINATOR__FAN

Batman Stomps.

Avatar image for eatmore_payless
eatmore_payless

2582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By eatmore_payless

there are many ways that proves Sherlock will never win against batman in an Investigation Showdown. The most obvious reason would be

The era. In batmans time all of the possible investigation technique, plans or whatever they call it, are already written on a book inside a library, in which batman had already read and memorized every single bit of details. While in Sherlock's case, those techniques are yet to discover.

Avatar image for marvelavengersalliance10
MarvelAvengersAlliance10

234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Batman...

Avatar image for gotwillpower
gotwillpower

718

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By gotwillpower

@eatmore_payless said:

there are many ways that proves Sherlock will never win against batman in an Investigation Showdown. The most obvious reason would be

The era. In batmans time all of the possible investigation technique, plans or whatever they call it, are already written on a book inside a library, in which batman had already read and memorized every single bit of details. While in Sherlock's case, those techniques are yet to discover.

Maybe Batman has studied more than Holmes, but keep in mind that Holmes was ahead of his time. He was the inventor of the methods that Batman learned. Here's an analogy; modern day philosophers learn from many different sources, but the foundation of their learning often comes from ancient Greece. Pythagoras might have lived long ago when there weren't any books on philosophy, but today he is certainly regarded with respect by modern philosophers.

Avatar image for tronhammer
TronHammer

950

Forum Posts

24

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 48

#6  Edited By TronHammer

Sherlock Holmes would win because of his familiarity with the era. Batman could study a lot of history, but he spends most of his time in the mordern world. Batman will learn quickly while he's in the past, but Sherlock Holmes has the homefield advantage.

Avatar image for sherlock
Sherlock

7491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Sherlock

And as anyone may have guessed at the mention of my namesake here i am.

I see the OP was edited so im not sure what was there to begin with but going by what is there now my namesake takes this.

I have always said that Holmes was by and large better than Batman but that being said Batman has modern science on his side and Holmes does not.In any normal matchup Batman has a clear advantage.

In this case Batman has all his modern techniques but no equipment in order to use most of these techniques.On top of that he is in a strange city in a different era of time.If that alone doesnt freak him out chances are a guy in a batsuit will freak everyone else out.Getting information will be very bothersome for him.Getting into the crime scene itself will also be next to impossible since the police will have it sealed off and wont be letting anyone in

Holmes on the other hand has all his resources here since this is his time and his city.Gathering information wont be any more difficult than normal for him.this gives him an "Elementary" win

Avatar image for vouile
Vouile

700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Vouile

@TERMINATOR__FAN said:

Batman Stomps.

@eatmore_payless said:

there are many ways that proves Sherlock will never win against batman in an Investigation Showdown. The most obvious reason would be

The era. In batmans time all of the possible investigation technique, plans or whatever they call it, are already written on a book inside a library, in which batman had already read and memorized every single bit of details. While in Sherlock's case, those techniques are yet to discover.

@MarvelAvengersAlliance10 said:

Batman...

All this.

Totally agreed upon. Nice post Eatmore_Payless! C=

Vouile

Avatar image for sherlock
Sherlock

7491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Sherlock

@eatmore_payless said:

there are many ways that proves Sherlock will never win against batman in an Investigation Showdown. The most obvious reason would be

The era. In batmans time all of the possible investigation technique, plans or whatever they call it, are already written on a book inside a library, in which batman had already read and memorized every single bit of details. While in Sherlock's case, those techniques are yet to discover.

This is in Holmes era.Batman is at the disadvantage in this one

Avatar image for vouile
Vouile

700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By Vouile

@Sherlock said:

@eatmore_payless said:

there are many ways that proves Sherlock will never win against batman in an Investigation Showdown. The most obvious reason would be

The era. In batmans time all of the possible investigation technique, plans or whatever they call it, are already written on a book inside a library, in which batman had already read and memorized every single bit of details. While in Sherlock's case, those techniques are yet to discover.

This is in Holmes era.Batman is at the disadvantage in this one

No, you should know this Sherlock.

I'm sure Batman has studied techniques of the past and the present. He knows tactical and strategic techniques in and out.

Batman wins.

Vouile

Avatar image for sherlock
Sherlock

7491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11  Edited By Sherlock

@Vouile said:

@Sherlock said:

@eatmore_payless said:

there are many ways that proves Sherlock will never win against batman in an Investigation Showdown. The most obvious reason would be

The era. In batmans time all of the possible investigation technique, plans or whatever they call it, are already written on a book inside a library, in which batman had already read and memorized every single bit of details. While in Sherlock's case, those techniques are yet to discover.

This is in Holmes era.Batman is at the disadvantage in this one

No, you should know this Sherlock.

I'm sure Batman has studied techniques of the past and the present. He knows tactical and strategic techniques in and out.

Batman wins.

Vouile

Im fully aware of what Batman is capable (Im actually a fanboy of him as well)

Id ask you read the OP.It states that Batman is in London,the year is 1890.Batman has no gear except a magnifying glass.

As great a detective as Bruce is he is way out of his element here.This is a city for all intense and purposes he has never been to where he knows absolutely no one.Getting into the crime scene is going to be a task by itself.Who would let him in?Not the police.They have no idea who this guy is.On top of that he has very little way of gathering information at all.Hes going to stick out like a sore thumb so speaking to anyone is pretty much out of the question.Even if he beats the answers out of them how will he know who to administer the beating to?

Again he is outside his city as well as his time,has no gear and no contacts.He really has nothing to go on for this

Avatar image for gotwillpower
gotwillpower

718

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By gotwillpower

@Sherlock said:

I see the OP was edited so im not sure what was there to begin with but going by what is there now my namesake takes this.

I didn't change the time period. I made this thread originally with the race set in some time around 1880.

Avatar image for vouile
Vouile

700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By Vouile

@Sherlock said:

Im fully aware of what Batman is capable (Im actually a fanboy of him as well)

Id ask you read the OP.It states that Batman is in London,the year is 1890.Batman has no gear except a magnifying glass.

As great a detective as Bruce is he is way out of his element here.This is a city for all intense and purposes he has never been to where he knows absolutely no one.Getting into the crime scene is going to be a task by itself.Who would let him in?Not the police.They have no idea who this guy is.On top of that he has very little way of gathering information at all.Hes going to stick out like a sore thumb so speaking to anyone is pretty much out of the question.Even if he beats the answers out of them how will he know who to administer the beating to?

Again he is outside his city as well as his time,has no gear and no contacts.He really has nothing to go on for this

Thanks, I scanned the original post, I was a little lazy. :P

But I think you're purely under estimating Batman's skills. He's a strategist and tactician, he should know what to do in a situation like this! :S And I'm sure he was an A-grader in history, but he was an A-grader in everything really! :D

And how will he get into the crime scene? Easy, he flows like a teleporting ninja! :D xD

Batman's got this!

Vouile

Avatar image for gotwillpower
gotwillpower

718

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By gotwillpower

@Vouile: But can he solve the crime as quickly as Sherlock Holmes? Sherlock Holmes has a reputation for solving cases as soon as he is on the scene. He doesn't know the name of the murderer, but he knows their physical characteristics, how they killed the victim, and why they killed the victim. Batman solves crimes traditionally: questioning people in question, following clues, etc. Holmes would win because he figures everything out before he gets any additional knowledge.

Avatar image for bane_of_sith
Bane_of_sith

2923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By Bane_of_sith

Sherlock Holmes is beyond any crime solver there is and that includes batman,,with no special tech he can observe a scene and pick out every detail...his skills of deduction are almost superhuman,,I'd suggest reading the adventure of the empty house,,the adventure of he Norwood builder,,the adventure of the dancing men, the solitary cyclist,,the priory school,,black Peter ,,,pretty much anything written by sir Arthur Conan Doyle ....Holmes is a phenom

Avatar image for gotwillpower
gotwillpower

718

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By gotwillpower

@Bane_of_sith said:

Sherlock Holmes is beyond any crime solver there is and that includes batman,,with no special tech he can observe a scene and pick out every detail...his skills of deduction are almost superhuman,,I'd suggest reading the adventure of the empty house,,the adventure of he Norwood builder,,the adventure of the dancing men, the solitary cyclist,,the priory school,,black Peter ,,,pretty much anything written by sir Arthur Conan Doyle ....Holmes is a phenom

Totally true. While Batman's character is the world's greatest detective, we never see him showcasing this great detective skill in comics. Perhaps he analyzes chemicals or learns secret identities, but I've never read a Batman comic that compares to Holmes' stories.

Avatar image for princearagorn1
PrinceAragorn1

31807

Forum Posts

53

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17  Edited By PrinceAragorn1

@gotwillpower said:

@Bane_of_sith said:

Sherlock Holmes is beyond any crime solver there is and that includes batman,,with no special tech he can observe a scene and pick out every detail...his skills of deduction are almost superhuman,,I'd suggest reading the adventure of the empty house,,the adventure of he Norwood builder,,the adventure of the dancing men, the solitary cyclist,,the priory school,,black Peter ,,,pretty much anything written by sir Arthur Conan Doyle ....Holmes is a phenom

Totally true. While Batman's character is the world's greatest detective, we never see him showcasing this great detective skill in comics. Perhaps he analyzes chemicals or learns secret identities, but I've never read a Batman comic that compares to Holmes' stories.

Very Agreeable. Batman is always called the best detective, but it's the writers that make the difference. Batman has good feats, but they can never explain how he did that. Doyle is better at detective-writing than all the comic writers put together.

But that doesn't stop me from reading batman :p

Avatar image for vaeternus
Vaeternus

9558

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18  Edited By Vaeternus

I think it's close, Batman will go to greater lengths I think then Sherlock and is no doubt a better fighter and far more sneaky.

Sherlock COULD possibly be smarter detective skills wise but even that's close given what Batman has done over time.

Overall leaning Batman, but Holmes is good too.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d921c81bd12c
deactivated-5d921c81bd12c

4881

Forum Posts

322406

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

Sherlock Holmes.

Avatar image for praetor_fenix
Praetor_fenix

227

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

#20  Edited By Praetor_fenix

@gotwillpower: Pythagoras was not a philosopher he was a matematician.

Avatar image for innervenom123
InnerVenom123

29886

Forum Posts

1786

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 1

#21  Edited By InnerVenom123

Batman.

Avatar image for wolfrazer
Wolfrazer

21199

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22  Edited By Wolfrazer
@gotwillpower:  I think its more, that his technology that he has gives Batman the title of greatest detective in the world. Without all of it, I don't really see him that much difference then the other detectives who don't have the tech but he would be at a disadvantage compared to the others who don't rely on tech all that much but their own personal skills and what not.
Avatar image for gotwillpower
gotwillpower

718

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#23  Edited By gotwillpower

@Praetor_fenix said:

@gotwillpower: Pythagoras was not a philosopher he was a matematician.

From his wiki page:

Pythagoras of Samos (Ancient Greek: Πυθαγόρας ὁ Σάμιος [Πυθαγόρης in Ionian Greek] Pythagóras ho Sámios "Pythagoras the Samian", or simply Πυθαγόρας; b. about 570 – d. about 495 BC) was an IonianGreekphilosopher, mathematician...

Philosophers study a lot of things, especially math.

Avatar image for gotwillpower
gotwillpower

718

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#24  Edited By gotwillpower

@Wolfrazer said:

@gotwillpower: I think its more, that his technology that he has gives Batman the title of greatest detective in the world. Without all of it, I don't really see him that much difference then the other detectives who don't have the tech but he would be at a disadvantage compared to the others who don't rely on tech all that much but their own personal skills and what not.

So in this battle, you are saying that Holmes would win? (Because Batman doesn't have his utility belt in this case).

Avatar image for gingerpenny
gingerpenny

2401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25  Edited By gingerpenny

Purely mystery solving Holmes takes it

Avatar image for wolfrazer
Wolfrazer

21199

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26  Edited By Wolfrazer
@gotwillpower said:

@Wolfrazer said:

@gotwillpower: I think its more, that his technology that he has gives Batman the title of greatest detective in the world. Without all of it, I don't really see him that much difference then the other detectives who don't have the tech but he would be at a disadvantage compared to the others who don't rely on tech all that much but their own personal skills and what not.

So in this battle, you are saying that Holmes would win? (Because Batman doesn't have his utility belt in this case).

Slightly yes, being that Batman seems to rely on his high tech gadgets to help him solve crimes. IE: His computer, lab, etc
Avatar image for zearing
Zearing

1539

Forum Posts

1125

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#27  Edited By Zearing

Batman would win, for the simple reason that he has come from the future and, from his perspective, it would of happened over 200 years ago. He would know who the killer is from reading about Sherluck solving the crime in his past.

Avatar image for methen
methen

4

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28  Edited By methen

I would say Sherlock Holmes for the simple reason he unlike Batman relies totally on his wits and Brain, While Batman relies on technology and computers to solve crime, Batman him self has said that Sherlock Holmes was worlds greatest detective...

Avatar image for shawnbaby
Shawnbaby

11064

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Loading Video...

Avatar image for princearagorn1
PrinceAragorn1

31807

Forum Posts

53

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The consulting detective slaughters the bat.

Avatar image for patrat18
patrat18

11753

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#31  Edited By patrat18

Holmes.

Avatar image for killa_jawzz
killa_JAWZz

5

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32  Edited By killa_JAWZz

I think that Batman has the upper hand if he was to use his equipment and computers but as it is taken away I think he is not as good as Sherlock Holmes, Sherlock Holmes has only been using a magnifying glass for all his mysteries and relies on his powers of observation and deduction but Batman relies on his equipment. If Sherlock Holmes was in the same era as Batman and had the same equipment he would be better than Batman. Also in the comics Sherlock Holmes deduced that Batman was Bruce Wayne from the beginning but chose to ignore the fact.

Avatar image for killa_jawzz
killa_JAWZz

5

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

No Caption Provided

Avatar image for iheartzombies92--defunct
IheartZombies92--defunct

2317

Forum Posts

3311

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Holmes takes it

Avatar image for rogueshadow
rogueshadow

30017

Forum Posts

237

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 rogueshadow  Moderator

Holmes. No contest.

Avatar image for thelocust619
thelocust619

8551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By thelocust619

Normally id be inclined to say Holmes, he's on cocaine pretty much all the time. Batman may be angry all the time but its not the same. Studying techniques from the future won't help, how can he use those techniques without any technology? (Fingerprinting, blood work...its all ineffective at thus point) Holmes brain is moving far faster than bats and he's completely familiar with the premise.

However, Batman wins for one reason...he doesn't need evidence. He can figure things out through PIS with literally no usable information ....joker left a couple periodic elements somewhere random, Batman broke it down to its chemical initials then spelled a word it totally didn't spell based on like 3 letters....he once fought a rainbow monster that shot beams of color, and based on literally NOTHING he deduced that it was created by a volcano under bulls*%$ conditions and could only be defeated through the same method. Based on LITERALLY NOTHING AT ALL!! At that, I may as well mention Robin also has this power if its convenient to the plot.

Avatar image for copete
copete

2960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Loading Video...

Avatar image for deactivated-5edd330f57b65
deactivated-5edd330f57b65

26437

Forum Posts

815

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Batman

Avatar image for jokerpoker
Jokerpoker

3144

Forum Posts

15799

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 11

I'd have to say Batman.

Avatar image for stormyboltz
Stormyboltz

5

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40  Edited By Stormyboltz
@gotwillpower: I think its more, that his technology that he has gives Batman the title of greatest detective in the world. Without all of it, I don't really see him that much difference then the other detectives who don't have the tech but he would be at a disadvantage compared to the others who don't rely on tech all that much but their own personal skills and what not.

This is a terrible misconception. Batman uses tech and expertise because the actual scale he operates at is outside most detectives paygrade, including Holmes. Batman also uses tech because he's not solely a detective and is usually working on numerous crimes at once. For example in a recent issue of Justice League he deduced that Amazo was repairing itself with nanites, even Superman was baffled how he knew that.

No Caption Provided

Even Dick, who Bruce trained, was able to casually solve crimes without having to even physically be there, or use any tech, simply by watching America's Most Wanted.

Batman also seems to make some pretty inane leaps in logic, just like TheLocust619 mentioned above.

If we're actually talking about pure deductive skills and reasoning, Batman and DC for that matter seem to acknowledge that Holmes is number 1 in that regard, but Bruce and Dick for that matter are still above most other fictional detectives in terms of pure reasoning ability, and Batman having his own comparable deductive skills along with his expertise in numerous area's makes him the best detective overall though, at least in terms of how effective he is.

Avatar image for algorhythm511
algorhythm511

2684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This is a hard one. I think for his time, Sherlock is in his own element and is much more used to not relying on tech to solve crimes. So, I am going to give it to Holmes.

Avatar image for sunman
SUNMAN

8614

Forum Posts

659

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Holmes

Avatar image for princearagorn1
PrinceAragorn1

31807

Forum Posts

53

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

sherlock.

Avatar image for jacthripper
Jacthripper

15064

Forum Posts

80

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@stormyboltz: And so does Shawn Spencer, who is a very sloppy, modern holmes

Avatar image for ssj3gohan007
ssj3gohan007

1972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45  Edited By ssj3gohan007

Sherlock Holmes

Like it was said before his ability to solve mysteries is almost superhuman and doesn't require any tech

Batman is not used to using only a magnifying glass, it will limit him greatly.

Sherlock Holmes skills are more genuine, impressive, and deserved, while Batman's writers are just pulling things out of their @$$ sometimes, that defies any logic or common sense. With Batman its more like 1)Insert random mystery or crime to solve 2)Batman has to somehow, someway solve that mystery no matter what - because he's batman! 3)Come up with some random way to solve the case that makes no sense whatsoever because the writer has no clue how Batman could possibly solve this mystery only that he somehow has to, no matter the odds.

While Sherlock Holmes also solves all his mysteries but the author doesn't just make up a random mystery without figuring out how Holmes is supposed to solve it. He tells a story in a very brilliant and methodical way, showcasing Holmes's talents, and how extraordinary he is, without being silly. The mystery will actually make perfect sense by the end and people can understand it and how Holmes reached his conclusions.

Avatar image for thebattlecalculatot
TheBattleCalculatot

425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Batman stomps. Once he figures out who did it, he'll beat up the killer and put him in jail without help.

He's called the greatest detective for a reason.

Batman.

Avatar image for 1mbatman
1MBATMAN

7

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

One thing he said equiptment does that count with the batcomputer i know its a stupid question but still

Avatar image for killermovies
Killermovies

1191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Bumpity bump bump

Avatar image for stormdriven
Stormdriven

19053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Sherlock Holmes

Avatar image for deanmottershead
deanmottershead

11

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I think batman would be in awe of Sherlock and might even just sit back and allow him to solve the case just so that he could study him and his techniques, in the OP there is no danger to anyone or to either character I dont think batman is that much of a **** that he would use knowledge from nearly 200 years in the future just to prove he is "better" than Sherlock that would be like batman challenging a random blind guy to a death battle