Aslan vs Thor

Movie versions only. Who wins? They fight on Asgard. Thor stands up to the creature and the fight begins.

Movie versions only. Who wins? They fight on Asgard. Thor stands up to the creature and the fight begins.

Whatever was implied about Aslan was not shown to be true about Aslan. No feats to compare against Thor's bulldozing of the frost giants. Thor via hammer to lion.

Whatever was implied about Aslan was not shown to be true about Aslan. No feats to compare against Thor's bulldozing of the frost giants. Thor via hammer to lion.

@Fortified_Hooligan said:

Whatever was implied about Aslan was not shown to be true about Aslan. No feats to compare against Thor's bulldozing of the frost giants. Thor via hammer to lion.

what's to say that would take him down? he only died in the first movie because he sacrificed himself in Edmunds place.  What was shown is that he was nigh-omniscient.

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Fortified_Hooligan said:

Whatever was implied about Aslan was not shown to be true about Aslan. No feats to compare against Thor's bulldozing of the frost giants. Thor via hammer to lion.

what's to say that would take him down? he only died in the first movie because he sacrificed himself in Edmunds place. What was shown is that he was nigh-omniscient, immortal, can resurrect, breathe the breath of life, open portals and roar loud enough that nearly the entire world can hear it and be afraid.

The bold part explains it completely.

Oh for... I know Aslan is supposed to be a representation of Christ but there are no feats that Aslan has that can compare to what Thor has done in his movie. Thor takes this easily.

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Fortified_Hooligan said:

Whatever was implied about Aslan was not shown to be true about Aslan. No feats to compare against Thor's bulldozing of the frost giants. Thor via hammer to lion.

what's to say that would take him down? he only died in the first movie because he sacrificed himself in Edmunds place.  What was shown is that he was nigh-omniscient.

And in the films, he showed he wasn't extremely powerful either. Thor will lay waste to all of Narnia with repeated lightning-imbued ground pounds, after he decimates the lion of course.

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Fortified_Hooligan said:

Whatever was implied about Aslan was not shown to be true about Aslan. No feats to compare against Thor's bulldozing of the frost giants. Thor via hammer to lion.

what's to say that would take him down? he only died in the first movie because he sacrificed himself in Edmunds place. What was shown is that he was nigh-omniscient, immortal, can resurrect, breathe the breath of life, open portals and roar loud enough that nearly the entire world can hear it and be afraid.

The bold part explains it completely.

Oh for... I know Aslan is supposed to be a representation of Christ but there are no feats that Aslan has that can compare to what Thor has done in his movie. Thor takes this easily.

TOAA does have feats. He created everything, including all the beings who are more powerful than Thor. Ergo, he beats Thor.

@Illuminatus said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Fortified_Hooligan said:

Whatever was implied about Aslan was not shown to be true about Aslan. No feats to compare against Thor's bulldozing of the frost giants. Thor via hammer to lion.

what's to say that would take him down? he only died in the first movie because he sacrificed himself in Edmunds place.  What was shown is that he was nigh-omniscient.

And in the films, he showed he wasn't extremely powerful either. Thor will lay waste to all of Narnia with repeated lightning-imbued ground pounds, after he decimates the lion of course.

@The_Mayhem_Theory said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Fortified_Hooligan said:

Whatever was implied about Aslan was not shown to be true about Aslan. No feats to compare against Thor's bulldozing of the frost giants. Thor via hammer to lion.

what's to say that would take him down? he only died in the first movie because he sacrificed himself in Edmunds place. What was shown is that he was nigh-omniscient, immortal, can resurrect, breathe the breath of life, open portals and roar loud enough that nearly the entire world can hear it and be afraid.

The bold part explains it completely.

@Lvenger said:

Oh for... I know Aslan is supposed to be a representation of Christ but there are no feats that Aslan has that can compare to what Thor has done in his movie. Thor takes this easily.

Having no feats and not showing extreme power are also attributed to the TOAA, so does that mean Thor can win that battle too?

My memory of the Narnia films is spotty (I didn't even bother seeing Dawn Treader), but Thor wasn't any great shakes in his movie either.

My memory of the Narnia films is spotty (I didn't even bother seeing Dawn Treader), but Thor wasn't any great shakes in his movie either.

@Edgeworth_11 said:

Movie versions only. Who wins? They fight on Asgard. Thor stands up to the creature and the fight begins.

Didn't movie version of Aslan basically say he is God/Jesus in the 3rd movie, of Narnia and the "real" world?  The book version seems to be based on the belief that they (God/Jesus) are the same being, and he created Narnia with a song and his "country" is most likely Heaven.  I'm leaning towards him just because I'm pretty sure he is a form of The God.

@Illuminatus said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Illuminatus said:

Completely and utterly irrelevant to the scenario at hand. Try and come up with a more elaborate argument.

Seconded. In battle forum debates, evidence from scans or references from issues are the only way you can strongly support your case. In this instance, Thor has more feats from his film that show he could easily defeat Aslan and that's not even the comic book version of Thor who is way more powerful. In any case, you need to think of another argument to make to prove your point.

TOAA does have feats. He created everything, including all the beings who are more powerful than Thor. Ergo, he beats Thor.

@CitizenBane said:

TOAA does have feats. He created everything, including all the beings who are more powerful than Thor. Ergo, he beats Thor.

All of TOAAs feats are just implied as what Aslan is, TOAA has not been shown doing anything, we just assume he did it and is all powerful because he is Marvels version of God.  According to previous posters such feats are not comparable because they are not in the same vein as using lightning and killing frost giants.  Now I will direct everybody to the battle rules which state feats are to be used to support logic, logically it does not matter what feats Thor has because in the 3rd movie Aslan basically admits to being God, the source material also makes reference to him being such and it's pretty clear across the board that the creator of Aslan meant for him to be God.

@Illuminatus said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Illuminatus said:

Completely and utterly irrelevant to the scenario at hand. Try and come up with a more elaborate argument.

Seconded. In battle forum debates, evidence from scans or references from issues are the only way you can strongly support your case. In this instance, Thor has more feats from his film that show he could easily defeat Aslan and that's not even the comic book version of Thor who is way more powerful. In any case, you need to think of another argument to make to prove your point.

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@CitizenBane said:

TOAA does have feats. He created everything, including all the beings who are more powerful than Thor. Ergo, he beats Thor.

All of TOAAs feats are just implied as what Aslan is, TOAA has not been shown doing anything, we just assume he did it and is all powerful because he is Marvels version of God.  According to previous posters such feats are not comparable because they are not in the same vein as using lightning and killing frost giants.  Now I will direct everybody to the battle rules which state feats are to be used to support logic, logically it does not matter what feats Thor has because in the 3rd movie Aslan basically admits to being God, the source material also makes reference to him being such and it's pretty clear across the board that the creator of Aslan meant for him to be God.

The source material is irrelevant, seeing as this scenario can only draw from what occurred in the film. 

@Lvenger said:

@Illuminatus said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Illuminatus said:

Completely and utterly irrelevant to the scenario at hand. Try and come up with a more elaborate argument.

Seconded. In battle forum debates, evidence from scans or references from issues are the only way you can strongly support your case. In this instance, Thor has more feats from his film that show he could easily defeat Aslan and that's not even the comic book version of Thor who is way more powerful. In any case, you need to think of another argument to make to prove your point.

It's hardly irrelevant if you can only base everything off feats and use no logic, then comic book Storm is more powerful than movie Thor, although it is fact that he is still the god of thunder and should be able to beat her just like he can in the comics.  As I said before it is logic that dictates the battle forums, feats and scans are secondary, used to support logic.  A being that is The God does not need feats, the name is the only feat needed.

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Lvenger said:

@Illuminatus said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Illuminatus said:

Completely and utterly irrelevant to the scenario at hand. Try and come up with a more elaborate argument.

Seconded. In battle forum debates, evidence from scans or references from issues are the only way you can strongly support your case. In this instance, Thor has more feats from his film that show he could easily defeat Aslan and that's not even the comic book version of Thor who is way more powerful. In any case, you need to think of another argument to make to prove your point.

It's hardly irrelevant if you can only base everything off feats and use no logic, then comic book Storm is more powerful than movie Thor, although it is fact that he is still the god of thunder and should be able to beat her just like he can in the comics. As I said before it is logic that dictates the battle forums, feats and scans are secondary, used to support logic. A being that is The God does not need feats, the name is the only feat needed.

Comic book Storm is more powerful than movie Thor. If movie Aslan claims to be God without having the feats to back it up, how does that make him any different from the folks in the psychiatric ward who claim the same thing?

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Lvenger said:

@Illuminatus said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Illuminatus said:

Completely and utterly irrelevant to the scenario at hand. Try and come up with a more elaborate argument.

Seconded. In battle forum debates, evidence from scans or references from issues are the only way you can strongly support your case. In this instance, Thor has more feats from his film that show he could easily defeat Aslan and that's not even the comic book version of Thor who is way more powerful. In any case, you need to think of another argument to make to prove your point.

It's hardly irrelevant if you can only base everything off feats and use no logic, then comic book Storm is more powerful than movie Thor, although it is fact that he is still the god of thunder and should be able to beat her just like he can in the comics. As I said before it is logic that dictates the battle forums, feats and scans are secondary, used to support logic. A being that is The God does not need feats, the name is the only feat needed.

And unfortunately, to prove that Aslan is more powerful than Thor, who has LOADS of proven feats than the simple ones Aslan has shown in the movie, you NEED to incorporate visuals in your argument. "Aslan is The God of Narnia," cool, but what puts him on Thor's level of power? Next to nothing, as he hasn't expressed any other abilities that rivals Thor's, other than the Breath of Life.

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Lvenger said:

@Illuminatus said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Illuminatus said:

Completely and utterly irrelevant to the scenario at hand. Try and come up with a more elaborate argument.

Seconded. In battle forum debates, evidence from scans or references from issues are the only way you can strongly support your case. In this instance, Thor has more feats from his film that show he could easily defeat Aslan and that's not even the comic book version of Thor who is way more powerful. In any case, you need to think of another argument to make to prove your point.

It's hardly irrelevant if you can only base everything off feats and use no logic, then comic book Storm is more powerful than movie Thor, although it is fact that he is still the god of thunder and should be able to beat her just like he can in the comics.  As I said before it is logic that dictates the battle forums, feats and scans are secondary, used to support logic.  A being that is The God does not need feats, the name is the only feat needed.

There was literally no need for you to bring in a comic book Storm vs movie Thor argument. Seriously, don't do it again. 

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Lvenger said:

@Illuminatus said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Illuminatus said:

Completely and utterly irrelevant to the scenario at hand. Try and come up with a more elaborate argument.

Seconded. In battle forum debates, evidence from scans or references from issues are the only way you can strongly support your case. In this instance, Thor has more feats from his film that show he could easily defeat Aslan and that's not even the comic book version of Thor who is way more powerful. In any case, you need to think of another argument to make to prove your point.

It's hardly irrelevant if you can only base everything off feats and use no logic, then comic book Storm is more powerful than movie Thor, although it is fact that he is still the god of thunder and should be able to beat her just like he can in the comics. As I said before it is logic that dictates the battle forums, feats and scans are secondary, used to support logic. A being that is The God does not need feats, the name is the only feat needed.

Comic book Storm is more powerful than movie Thor. If movie Aslan claims to be God without having the feats to back it up, how does that make him any different from the folks in the psychiatric ward who claim the same thing?

He is said to be "God", but with literally almost no feats to back that up, Thor smacks him around easily.

@LordOfAllHumans: Writers don't come into play during these battles, only what feats have been shown in the source material. Comic book writers often use PIS and BFR amongst other annoying plot devices that constrew the story. As such, these battles are decided via the feats that have been shown not by writer involvement.

@LordOfAllHumans: Writers don't come into play during these battles, only what feats have been shown in the source material. Comic book writers often use PIS and BFR amongst other annoying plot devices that constrew the story. As such, these battles are decided via the feats that have been shown not by writer involvement.

He is said to be "God", but with literally almost no feats to back that up, Thor smacks him around easily.

@LordOfAllHumans: Sorry I should have rephrased my last comment. Writers come into play in the sense that they provide the feats for which we base our arguments on but aren't involved in the battle. That's what I meant. And just because Aslan is said to be a representation of an all powerful deity doesn't mean he is. It's like saying if the bricks in the wall are small, the wall will be small which may not be the case if lots of small bricks are used. It's flawed logic that doesn't have any supporting evidence to back it up.

@LordOfAllHumans: Absolutely not. TOAA has feats, Aslan does not. Simple, yet incomparable logic.

I had no idea people felt so strongly about the Chronicles of Narnia films.

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Lvenger said:

@Illuminatus said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Illuminatus said:

Completely and utterly irrelevant to the scenario at hand. Try and come up with a more elaborate argument.

Seconded. In battle forum debates, evidence from scans or references from issues are the only way you can strongly support your case. In this instance, Thor has more feats from his film that show he could easily defeat Aslan and that's not even the comic book version of Thor who is way more powerful. In any case, you need to think of another argument to make to prove your point.

It's hardly irrelevant if you can only base everything off feats and use no logic, then comic book Storm is more powerful than movie Thor, although it is fact that he is still the god of thunder and should be able to beat her just like he can in the comics. As I said before it is logic that dictates the battle forums, feats and scans are secondary, used to support logic. A being that is The God does not need feats, the name is the only feat needed.

And unfortunately, to prove that Aslan is more powerful than Thor, who has LOADS of proven feats than the simple ones Aslan has shown in the movie, you NEED to incorporate visuals in your argument. "Aslan is The God of Narnia," cool, but what puts him on Thor's level of power? Next to nothing, as he hasn't expressed any other abilities that rivals Thor's, other than the Breath of Life.

@Illuminatus said:

I had no idea people felt so strongly about the Chronicles of Narnia films.

Same crap rolls for Harry Potter and Twilight. =X

@LordOfAllHumans: Absolutely not. TOAA has feats, Aslan does not. Simple, yet incomparable logic.

I had no idea people felt so strongly about the Chronicles of Narnia films.

@LordOfAllHumans: Sorry I should have rephrased my last comment. Writers come into play in the sense that they provide the feats for which we base our arguments on but aren't involved in the battle. That's what I meant. And just because Aslan is said to be a representation of an all powerful deity doesn't mean he is. It's like saying if the bricks in the wall are small, the wall will be small which may not be the case if lots of small bricks are used. It's flawed logic that doesn't have any supporting evidence to back it up.

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@The_Mayhem_Theory said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Lvenger said:

@Illuminatus said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Illuminatus said:

Completely and utterly irrelevant to the scenario at hand. Try and come up with a more elaborate argument.

Seconded. In battle forum debates, evidence from scans or references from issues are the only way you can strongly support your case. In this instance, Thor has more feats from his film that show he could easily defeat Aslan and that's not even the comic book version of Thor who is way more powerful. In any case, you need to think of another argument to make to prove your point.

It's hardly irrelevant if you can only base everything off feats and use no logic, then comic book Storm is more powerful than movie Thor, although it is fact that he is still the god of thunder and should be able to beat her just like he can in the comics. As I said before it is logic that dictates the battle forums, feats and scans are secondary, used to support logic. A being that is The God does not need feats, the name is the only feat needed.

And unfortunately, to prove that Aslan is more powerful than Thor, who has LOADS of proven feats than the simple ones Aslan has shown in the movie, you NEED to incorporate visuals in your argument. "Aslan is The God of Narnia," cool, but what puts him on Thor's level of power? Next to nothing, as he hasn't expressed any other abilities that rivals Thor's, other than the Breath of Life.

So you are saying that a being that God with a capital G, is not on Thor's level of power? You're right, a being like that would be above his power.

You're throwing it out of context.

@LordOfAllHumans: Exactly my point. People claim Aslan can do all sorts of things, but he has yet to do anything. I haven't seen him do anything physical besides roar and jump on top of the Witch.

Thor on the other hand, has feats, which in turn show that from what we've seen from both characters, Aslan get's smacked around.

@LordOfAllHumans: Exactly my point. People claim Aslan can do all sorts of things, but he has yet to do anything. I haven't seen him do anything physical besides roar and jump on top of the Witch.

Thor on the other hand, has feats, which in turn show that from what we've seen from both characters, Aslan get's smacked around.

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@The_Mayhem_Theory said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Lvenger said:

@Illuminatus said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Illuminatus said:

Completely and utterly irrelevant to the scenario at hand. Try and come up with a more elaborate argument.

Seconded. In battle forum debates, evidence from scans or references from issues are the only way you can strongly support your case. In this instance, Thor has more feats from his film that show he could easily defeat Aslan and that's not even the comic book version of Thor who is way more powerful. In any case, you need to think of another argument to make to prove your point.

It's hardly irrelevant if you can only base everything off feats and use no logic, then comic book Storm is more powerful than movie Thor, although it is fact that he is still the god of thunder and should be able to beat her just like he can in the comics. As I said before it is logic that dictates the battle forums, feats and scans are secondary, used to support logic. A being that is The God does not need feats, the name is the only feat needed.

And unfortunately, to prove that Aslan is more powerful than Thor, who has LOADS of proven feats than the simple ones Aslan has shown in the movie, you NEED to incorporate visuals in your argument. "Aslan is The God of Narnia," cool, but what puts him on Thor's level of power? Next to nothing, as he hasn't expressed any other abilities that rivals Thor's, other than the Breath of Life.

So you are saying that a being that God with a capital G, is not on Thor's level of power? You're right, a being like that would be above his power.

You're throwing it out of context.

@Deranged Midget said:

@LordOfAllHumans: Exactly my point. People claim Aslan can do all sorts of things, but he has yet to do anything. I haven't seen him do anything physical besides roar and jump on top of the Witch.

Thor on the other hand, has feats, which in turn show that from what we've seen from both characters, Aslan get's smacked around.

Which is exactly my point about beings are that are supposed to be God, most of them rarely do anything in fiction, some do even less then what Aslan did, so because Thor has feats we are to assume he can beat God.   TOAA - no feats God in Supernatural - no feats God in just about any movie involving demonic possession - feats (believing him is enough to defeat demons and Satan.) God in the Prophecy - no feats God (The Chairman) in the Adjustment Bureau - no feats the one fact remains - God = all powerful.  

@LordOfAllHumans: Yes "God" is powerful in any sense of the word but in these battles on the Vine, feats are required and necessary to establish a battle. Therefore with Aslan having no feats, he has no chance of winning.

You can't simply state, "Oh he's "God', automatic win." With that logic, I could state Thor is a god too so it evens the odds. Just because Aslan is the god of his universe, it doesn't make him any more powerful compared to the Marvel universe.

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Deranged Midget said:

@LordOfAllHumans: Exactly my point. People claim Aslan can do all sorts of things, but he has yet to do anything. I haven't seen him do anything physical besides roar and jump on top of the Witch.

Thor on the other hand, has feats, which in turn show that from what we've seen from both characters, Aslan get's smacked around.

Which is exactly my point about beings are that are supposed to be God, most of them rarely do anything in fiction, some do even less then what Aslan did, so because Thor has feats we are to assume he can beat God.   TOAA - no feats God in Supernatural - no feats God in just about any movie involving demonic possession - feats (believing him is enough to defeat demons and Satan.) God in the Prophecy - no feats God (The Chairman) in the Adjustment Bureau - no feats the one fact remains - God = all powerful.  

 Pretty much what I was thinking. 

@OmegaDynasty said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Deranged Midget said:

@LordOfAllHumans: Exactly my point. People claim Aslan can do all sorts of things, but he has yet to do anything. I haven't seen him do anything physical besides roar and jump on top of the Witch.

Thor on the other hand, has feats, which in turn show that from what we've seen from both characters, Aslan get's smacked around.

Which is exactly my point about beings are that are supposed to be God, most of them rarely do anything in fiction, some do even less then what Aslan did, so because Thor has feats we are to assume he can beat God.   TOAA - no feats God in Supernatural - no feats God in just about any movie involving demonic possession - feats (believing him is enough to defeat demons and Satan.) God in the Prophecy - no feats God (The Chairman) in the Adjustment Bureau - no feats the one fact remains - God = all powerful.  

 Pretty much what I was thinking. 

thank you somebody get's it.

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Lvenger said:

@LordOfAllHumans: Sorry I should have rephrased my last comment. Writers come into play in the sense that they provide the feats for which we base our arguments on but aren't involved in the battle. That's what I meant. And just because Aslan is said to be a representation of an all powerful deity doesn't mean he is. It's like saying if the bricks in the wall are small, the wall will be small which may not be the case if lots of small bricks are used. It's flawed logic that doesn't have any supporting evidence to back it up.

If he is said to be the representation of an all powerful deity by the person that created him, then it does mean that. The logic that you are using to disprove it is flawed.

What I mean is that it shouldn't mean that. Aslan is supposed to be omnipontent as that is one of the qualities of the God of classical theism i.e christianity which Aslan is supposed to represent. Yet nowhere in the Chronicles of Narnia does he show that omnipotence. Just the breath of life, summoning a river spirit etc. Those are abilities a superhuman at some point in comic book history has possessed. Not the exact same thing but resurrection of the dead and control over water are definitely powers that have cropped up. Anyway there are no feats to support the claim that Aslan is omnipotent whereas there is evidence that Thor is capable of smashing Aslan in, even if the movie version is used.

@LordOfAllHumans: Yes "God" is powerful in any sense of the word but in these battles on the Vine, feats are required and necessary to establish a battle. Therefore with Aslan having no feats, he has no chance of winning.

You can't simply state, "Oh he's "God', automatic win." With that logic, I could state Thor is a god too so it evens the odds. Just because Aslan is the god of his universe, it doesn't make any more powerful compared to the Marvel universe.

@OmegaDynasty: Valid point, but in bringing up the power scale, how do we know that Aslan is indeed that powerful, especially compared to the Marvel Universe. Thor is a god himself, and from what we've seen, he has yet to show his true potential.

@LordOfAllHumans: Not entirely true, every battle on the Vine requires some degree of feats and experience. Logic get's you no where except a dead end and a repetitive opinion in which you are currently repeating.

Again, simply because he is stated to be "God' in the universe of Narnia only establishes several things. He's stated to be immortal, re-incarnate to a degree, etc but from what we saw, he is still vulnerable to physical harm, in which allowing Thor the ability to beat him. I'm not saying Thor can kill him, but he has a definite chance of defeating him in a physical battle.

But I'll agree to disagree.

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@The_Mayhem_Theory said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

So you are saying that a being that God with a capital G, is not on Thor's level of power? You're right, a being like that would be above his power.

You're throwing it out of context.

how so?

God is a general term for any power (entity or otherwise) above normal human conditioning. Assuming that Aslan is "The God" of Narnia, and Jadis, the White Witch, being a magical being; the only one capable of defeating her was Aslan, which consequently, would put her on "Thor's level of power;" by that logic, wouldn't she be a "Goddess?" My argument is that Aslan hasn't shown any feats of impressiveness that tops Thor, giving Thor the victory.

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@Lvenger said:

@LordOfAllHumans: Sorry I should have rephrased my last comment. Writers come into play in the sense that they provide the feats for which we base our arguments on but aren't involved in the battle. That's what I meant. And just because Aslan is said to be a representation of an all powerful deity doesn't mean he is. It's like saying if the bricks in the wall are small, the wall will be small which may not be the case if lots of small bricks are used. It's flawed logic that doesn't have any supporting evidence to back it up.

If he is said to be the representation of an all powerful deity by the person that created him, then it does mean that. The logic that you are using to disprove it is flawed.

What I mean is that it shouldn't mean that. Aslan is supposed to be omnipontent as that is one of the qualities of the God of classical theism i.e christianity which Aslan is supposed to represent. Yet nowhere in the Chronicles of Narnia does he show that omnipotence. Just the breath of life, summoning a river spirit etc. Those are abilities a superhuman at some point in comic book history has possessed. Not the exact same thing but resurrection of the dead and control over water are definitely powers that have cropped up. Anyway there are no feats to support the claim that Aslan is omnipotent whereas there is evidence that Thor is capable of smashing Aslan in, even if the movie version is used.

@LordOfAllHumans: Not entirely true, every battle on the Vine requires some degree of feats and experience. Logic get's you no where except a dead end and a repetitive opinion in which you are currently repeating.

Again, simply because he is stated to be "God' in the universe of Narnia only establishes several things. He's stated to be immortal, re-incarnate to a degree, etc but from what we saw, he is still vulnerable to physical harm, in which allowing Thor the ability to beat him. I'm not saying Thor can kill him, but he has a definite chance of defeating him in a physical battle.

But I'll agree to disagree.

@LordOfAllHumans said:

@The_Mayhem_Theory said:

@LordOfAllHumans said:

So you are saying that a being that God with a capital G, is not on Thor's level of power? You're right, a being like that would be above his power.

You're throwing it out of context.

how so?

God is a general term for any power (entity or otherwise) above normal human conditioning. Assuming that Aslan is "The God" of Narnia, and Jadis, the White Witch, being a magical being; the only one capable of defeating her was Aslan, which consequently, would put her on "Thor's level of power;" by that logic, wouldn't she be a "Goddess?" My argument is that Aslan hasn't shown any feats of impressiveness that tops Thor, giving Thor the victory.