@nickthedevil said:
Grow up.
ehm yea? Apoc sent thor crashing through the building.... just cause you dont remember doesnt mean its not true soo... and he withstood those hits, and resisted...not exactly what i call "getting his tail kicked" he was holding thors hammer back... i mean, if THAT horsemen is able to hold down thor, and apoc is superior to his creation...
i was not into the whole cannon thing. i was arguing the point about why it was valid. an object/energy of that size, being shot with the speed, if not faster than a bullet, gives it more than enough strength to actually be taken seriously.
but suddenly i dont really care anymore. we can agree to disagree here. the point of a debate, is to sway the opinion of another... seeing as how i cant sway yours, and you wont change mine.
so as i said we agree to disagree... correct?
Learn to debate, try reading some comics
You don't know who threw Thor through that building and it doesn't matter anyway because one Thor started fighting he started kicking their asses, it doesn't matter if Apocalypse was able to resist the hits or not, he couldn't get a single hit in AND he needed to his horseman to save him. That Horseman tried to interfere and Thor one shotted him.
You're going to be hard pressed to find anyone that will take you seriously if you actually think Apocalypse is anywhere near Thor's level, because Avengers #3 is proof that Thor is world's above Apoc.
No, I'm not going to agree to disagree, you're flat out wrong, I'd only agree to disagree if you had a legitimate and well thought out argument.
On top of that you're credibility is in serious question, first you said you read everything with Atrocitus then you said you read the Red Lantern books, all 5 of them [if you include Rage of the Red Lanterns]
Log in to comment