@beezlebub: Pretty much.
@dccomicsrule2011: You'll note that he insists on dismissing us as "Sidious fans", completely ignoring how that is 1. Inaccurate and 2. A poor method of debating. But you are right, it is a waste of time to indulge him. I'm only considering it now so as not to mislead other users who happen upon this thread. Unenviable dilemma to be in.
And nice Cronal Avatar by the way. I may have to steal it from you later :)
@i_like_swords said:
@shroudofsorrow: @beezlebub: @dccomicsrule2011: I know you guys all have your reasons for choosing the Jedi team, which I tend to agree with, but could you expand on how you think the fight'd go? As far as fighting styles, match ups, and how long it takes for the first person to die, goes?
Well, as has been said, Anakin can beat either of them in a 1 on 1. Him Vs. Maul would be closer, but see, Obi-Wan has already beaten Savage, and once he does that he'll help Anakin against Maul. Alternatively, Anakin will beat Savage and then help Obi-Wan against Maul. Maul has done well against Obi-Wan, but Kenobi will be able to hold his own against the Dathomiran long enough for Anakin to lend a helping hand. Anakin won't have too much trouble with Savage all things considered. His fight with Anakin and Obi-Wan does not equate to Savage being superior to either one given how they were on the defensive for pretty much the whole duel and not really making much effort to fight back. When Obi-Wan fought Savage later, he beat him. So it stands to reason he could do so again, and Anakin could also beat him on the account of being a better duelist then Obi-Wan.
So that's why I think they win. And yes, the Dathomirans do have good teamwork, but that is also Anakin and Obi-Wan's specialty. So that won't help the Sith there.
Log in to comment