@supermanwithatan01 said:
@juiceboks:
1) that's because he only has 1 feat. I would argue that Amon overpowering a potent bloodbender is more impressive than overpowering an unsuspecting courtroom. You're argument implies that Amon wouldn't have been able to do the exact same thing, without evidence.
2) Yes, it matters that he was a prodigy and impressed his father by becoming a master at 14.
3) actually Amon is hinted to be more powerful than his father plenty of times.
You're saying because Amon didn't overtly do the exact thing his father did, he can't be as powerful which is a ridiculous argument.
Amon didn't want anyone to know he was a bender.
Amon showed superior speed feats, and was able to overpower a master firebender and the Avatar easily AND THEY KNEW HE WAS COMING. Unlike the courtroom feat.
We never saw Yakone resist bloodbending so I guess he just couldn't do it right?
We saw Amon clearly overpower his brother who froze a room full of master benders and escaped the way his father did.
Amon wins because he can resist the 1 trick pony and has more skill, abilities and speed than Yakone plain and simple.
1) It really isn't, not when that bloodbender is weaker than Yakone. Amon was able to do that to his brother because he's a better bloodbender, so Yakone should be able to replicate that for the same reason. I'm saying Amon can't replicate Yakone's feat because he hasn't done anything remotely comparable. That's not faulty reasoning at all in this case, and you haven't proved otherwise.
2) We don't know enough about Yakone's childhood to compare with that and Amon didn't showcase any power above Yakone's at that age, so no it really doesn't matter.
3) Name one.
It really isn't. You're trying to appeal to ignorance without any evidence, which is a ridiculous argument.
Even when he was found out he didn't showcase anything better than what he was capable of while holding back.
A battle between two bloodbenders isn't at all dependent on speed. That much is obvious. Yakone has also never been in a fight, so we can only guess how fast he can bend..again not that it matters. For the record though he did subdue Toph and Aang in their prime before they could bend at him.
Now you're trying to flip my argument you originally scrutinized, while at the same time grasping at straws. To resist bloodbending you have to be a bloodbender, the more powerful bender you are the easier it is to overpower your opponent. Amon has objectively inferior feats to Yakone, so why exactly should he be unable to defend himself from a much weaker bender?
Tarrlok subduing 9 people is in no way comparable to Yakone freezing the 50+ people in the courtroom that day. Come on now, I really shouldn't have to point that out.
One trick pony? What are you talking about? This is obviously going to come to their mastery of bloodbending, anything else they can do is completely irrelevant. Yakone has displayed a mastery of bloodbending Amon simply hasn't. It's that simple.
Hell I could make the argument that Amon was unable to fully subdue Korra by the end of Book 1, as opposed to Yakone forcing a more realized Avatar into the Avatar State to overcome his control. That alone shows the disparity in their power.
Log in to comment