300: Spartans vs Klingons

Avatar image for willpayton
willpayton

22502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By willpayton
No Caption Provided

VS

No Caption Provided

300 Spartans (movie versions) vs 300 Klingons (TNG, DS9 versions)

Klingons using standard outfits and batleths , no advanced weapons (obviously).

Random encounter, battle in wide open field. Who wins?

Avatar image for willpayton
willpayton

22502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By willpayton

bump

Avatar image for spartan101
Spartan101

5703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Spartan101

us. *biased*

Avatar image for typhion
Typhion

660

Forum Posts

372

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#4  Edited By Typhion

In a wide open field I'd give it to the Klingons. Spartan strength was based on holding formation. If the Klingons can cause them to break formation, I think Klingons have better innate physicals and at least equivalent combat skills for 1vs1.

Avatar image for picard1701
Picard

1142

Forum Posts

19

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#5  Edited By Picard

Quite interesting topic. :) Klingons have physical advantage - for example: when Worf was only thirteen he accidentally killed human boy during a soccer match, their heads had collided when they went up for the ball, Worf didn't even feel the impact, but he broke boy's neck. Klingons also have extra organs, this allowed them to survive severe injuries in battle and give them greater stamina on the battlefield. They had twenty-three ribs, two livers, an eight chambered heart, three lungs, and even redundant neural function and multiple stomachs. Klingons also have exoskeleton that protects vital organs. Standard bat'leth is made from metal called Baakonite - there's very little info about this metal, but considering the fact that Baakonite is used by advanced, space civilization I would say that it is far more resilient than weapons made from bronze. On the other hand Spartans have shields and that give them proper protection when Klingons are exposed. Also Spartans have range advantage - the hoplite spear was 9 feet long, when traditional bat'leth was typically approximately 116 centimeters long. We can't also forget about phalanx formation - this formation give Lacedaemonians great protection. In the end it all comes down to tactics - can Klingons break trough a phalanx formations? Sadly, I don't think so. Taking into account range advantage and better protection I would give the small majority to Spartans, however considering that Klingons probably have better weapons and they are definitely both stronger and more resilient, I would say that Spartans can only win six out of ten encounters.

Avatar image for imthedamnbatman
ImTheDamnBatman

3973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By ImTheDamnBatman

Klingons.

Avatar image for willpayton
willpayton

22502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm gonna go with the Spartansbecause of greater range and the shields. Klingons in the TV series never seemed that impressive IMO.

Avatar image for deactivated-579ecfa921bb2
deactivated-579ecfa921bb2

4347

Forum Posts

40

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Klingons

Avatar image for shavo
Shavo

2200

Forum Posts

389

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Shavo

spartans

Avatar image for cyborgzod
cyborgzod

1112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Spartans

Avatar image for petey_is_spidey
Petey_is_Spidey

11855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11