@silent_bomber: I guess I just don't like the ridiculousness of those movies and I don't equate their feats to showing any real skill.
And sure "match" wasn't the best choice of words but even against the superhuman Keaton, Joker only got ruffed up a little bit, taking several punches directly to the face and yet even after all that and falling over the edge of the building, he can still pull Batman and Vicki Vale over with him, what a cunning foe.
And wow Batman was punching Bane in the face, what a half-brained savage.
To be honest I don't scour the web for these topics, this is the first time I have seen a Keaton vs. Bale "argument" so excuse me for this being a fresh topic in my eyes, so feel free to be disgusted at us lesser beings whilst you and your superior knowledge are held over us.
What it actually comes down to is you obviously feeling that Keaton's superstrength would win this match despite him not really being all that good at fighting (in my eyes), whilst I would argue my belief that Baleman's superior fighting skill and intelligence would win out. I mean hell when Baleman realises Keaton is a superhuman and cannot be harmed by explosives, he would probably hop in The Bat and throw a few non harmful explosives round his way, which would surely be just enough to knock him unconscious. Then you would probably argue hey thats not a win cause look Keaton's not dead when I would argue that Batman is not supposed to kill and in anyway a knockout is a win in my eyes.
Guess what it might boil down to is me going I like human realistic Baleman, cause not only is he the closest representation to Batman, he is also based in a real world setting, whilst you like Keaton because he was given superpowers by Tim Burton and its all dark and gloomy.
Log in to comment