#1 Posted by blackhawk000111 (666 posts) - - Show Bio

What dou think about it???

#2 Posted by Jayc1324 (12226 posts) - - Show Bio

Well in the dark knight the big gun was collapsible and fit on the back of his belt under his cape. It wasn't actually inside the utility belt. And I must say that picture at the end is a little disturbing haha

#3 Posted by War Killer (20206 posts) - - Show Bio

In The Dark Knight you actually see him building the gun-thing he used during his trip to China. Similarly in Batman: Arkham City it shows Batman's combining different gadgets together to make new ones. Though some of those things are still too big to all fit in his belt, I'm assuming the idea is that his gadgets are broken down into smaller pieces, making them easier to store in his belt, and he uses only the pieces he needs to build whatever gadget is required at that moment.

On another note, one could also argue that Batman only uses certain gadgets for certain situations. Having only his standard gear, such as his grapple gun, Batarangs, smoke pellets, etc. on him at all time. It should also be noted that, despite how it appears in medias such as the Arkham game series, Batman doesn't have a universal stash of weapons in his belt. He doesn't have an infinite number of Batarangs, but more likely has only a select number.

#4 Posted by Jokerpoker (2963 posts) - - Show Bio

I never see him taking any candy bars out of it, disappointing.

#5 Posted by Hoplite91 (78 posts) - - Show Bio

"batarangs, batclaws . . . batSNACKS?"
Props if you know that reference.

#6 Edited by Alexander505 (2144 posts) - - Show Bio

"batarangs, batclaws . . . batSNACKS?"

Props if you know that reference.

You're quoting Arkham Asylum, don't you?

#7 Posted by PapiNacho (2408 posts) - - Show Bio

It's part of Batman's super powers dude, same reason he cracks trees with his feet. Character isn't meant to be real.

#8 Edited by Alexander505 (2144 posts) - - Show Bio

This story about the bat utility belt, is somehow, the weirder side of Batman