Publisher details bug?

Avatar image for mabster
mabster

27

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By mabster
Avatar image for porkbun
porkbun

61

Forum Posts

533

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#2 porkbun  Staff

@mabster: This has been fixed. You should also prefix the id with the resource type id. Support for the lookup based on just the id will be removed in the future.

Avatar image for mabster
mabster

27

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By mabster

Thanks froble.

Shame you're removing the named resource URIs. They're much more intuitive and don't require an extra lookup to generate.

Matt

Avatar image for mabster
mabster

27

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Hmm. I guess you're not actually removing the names. I still have to go to /api/publisher to find a publisher. What's the point of the resource type in the parameter when the resource type is in the path anyway?

Avatar image for porkbun
porkbun

61

Forum Posts

533

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#5 porkbun  Staff

@mabster: For internal use, also in cases where the resource name is not actually used in the code. For instance, objects are not called as such in the code. They are referred to as things to avoid conflict with constants.