This is What the ‘Daredevil’ Film Could Have Looked Like

  • 93 results
  • 1
  • 2
#51 Posted by IronAngelX (179 posts) - - Show Bio

@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@TheHeat said:
@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@IronAngelX: You actually think Disney will make dark and gritty films staring the Punisher and Moon Knight?

Yes. Disney did the "No Country for Old Men" movie, which was pretty violent.
Paramount did that film, anyway how exactly would you tie something that dark in to the Avengers?

Disney owns Miramax, Miramax coproduced the movie.

But why does everything have to be dark & gritty? The current DD comic by Waid is great and it's not very dark. Heck maybe Marvel won't even make a DD movie cause it won't tie into the avengers very well. All I know is that if there will be a movie it's mostly likely going to be pg-13 and there can only be so many things you can do in a pg-13 movie. And no don't go start blaming Disney cause it's pg-13.

I thought you were upset about Disney not making a gritty Daredevil movie...I think I misread something...either way...I don't think it'll be gritty but I think it could still be very good. lol

#52 Posted by The_Tree (7246 posts) - - Show Bio

That looked pretty cool, but I'm not too upset that it's not leading to a DD movie. I'm looking forward to seeing the inclusion of Daredevil to the Marvel Cinematic Universe someday, it may be awhile, but I'm excited to see it. I think Disney'll be able to handle his darker tone, reports say Iron Man 3 is supposed to be pretty dark, so that'll define whether or not Disney can cross that boundary. Daredevil shouldn't be hugely connected to the MCU, like regular visits from Thor or Iron Man, but there should be references here and there. We should also keep in mind that Daredevil has interacted with Avengers before while keeping the dark and serious tone, see Born Again.

#53 Posted by Jonny_Anonymous (32935 posts) - - Show Bio
@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@TheHeat said:
@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@IronAngelX: You actually think Disney will make dark and gritty films staring the Punisher and Moon Knight?

Yes. Disney did the "No Country for Old Men" movie, which was pretty violent.
Paramount did that film, anyway how exactly would you tie something that dark in to the Avengers?

Disney owns Miramax, Miramax coproduced the movie.

But why does everything have to be dark & gritty? The current DD comic by Waid is great and it's not very dark. Heck maybe Marvel won't even make a DD movie cause it won't tie into the avengers very well. All I know is that if there will be a movie it's mostly likely going to be pg-13 and there can only be so many things you can do in a pg-13 movie. And no don't go start blaming Disney cause it's pg-13.

So it was produced by a subsidiary and not Disney. The current DD is generic as hell, Waid took everything that made Dardevil unique and just stripped it all away. A non dark DD film is just a pointless Spider-Man clone
#54 Posted by edge0076 (56 posts) - - Show Bio

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@TheHeat said:
@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@IronAngelX: You actually think Disney will make dark and gritty films staring the Punisher and Moon Knight?

Yes. Disney did the "No Country for Old Men" movie, which was pretty violent.
Paramount did that film, anyway how exactly would you tie something that dark in to the Avengers?

Disney owns Miramax, Miramax coproduced the movie.

But why does everything have to be dark & gritty? The current DD comic by Waid is great and it's not very dark. Heck maybe Marvel won't even make a DD movie cause it won't tie into the avengers very well. All I know is that if there will be a movie it's mostly likely going to be pg-13 and there can only be so many things you can do in a pg-13 movie. And no don't go start blaming Disney cause it's pg-13.

So it was produced by a subsidiary and not Disney. The current DD is generic as hell, Waid took everything that made Dardevil unique and just stripped it all away. A non dark DD film is just a pointless Spider-Man clone

DING! DING! DING! We have a winner!

Most accurate post on the current state of Daredevil since the run began (and I usually like Mark Waid).

#55 Posted by Bull_iod (46 posts) - - Show Bio

This looked great. If this can't be a Daredevil movie could they use this style and angle for a Moon Knight movie? I would love to see that.

#56 Posted by GR2Blackout (2564 posts) - - Show Bio

I would have TOTALLY watched that movie.

#57 Posted by Chaos Burn (1777 posts) - - Show Bio

looks liek something tarantino would do

#58 Posted by Shamelesslysupportinaznballers (553 posts) - - Show Bio

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

So it was produced by a subsidiary and not Disney. The current DD is generic as hell, Waid took everything that made Dardevil unique and just stripped it all away. A non dark DD film is just a pointless Spider-Man clone

And Marvel is a subsidiary of Disney....

#59 Posted by DougCL (38 posts) - - Show Bio

you know, if marvel really has the movies planned out for the next 5 years, they should just get carnahan to do this same movie for them, outside of the avengers movie continuity. i dont know if fox owns carnahans script or whatever, but marvel should definitely think about starting to do some stand-alone films and this version of daredevil would have been an awesome place to start.

#60 Posted by Jonny_Anonymous (32935 posts) - - Show Bio
@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

So it was produced by a subsidiary and not Disney. The current DD is generic as hell, Waid took everything that made Dardevil unique and just stripped it all away. A non dark DD film is just a pointless Spider-Man clone

And Marvel is a subsidiary of Disney....

Yes and Marvel makes Disney style films 
#61 Posted by Shamelesslysupportinaznballers (553 posts) - - Show Bio

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

So it was produced by a subsidiary and not Disney. The current DD is generic as hell, Waid took everything that made Dardevil unique and just stripped it all away. A non dark DD film is just a pointless Spider-Man clone

And Marvel is a subsidiary of Disney....

Yes and Marvel makes Disney style films

You're right, I do remember watching Snow White and seeing all of New York blown up and one of the Dwarves getting stabbed in the heart and dying.

#62 Posted by Jonny_Anonymous (32935 posts) - - Show Bio
@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

So it was produced by a subsidiary and not Disney. The current DD is generic as hell, Waid took everything that made Dardevil unique and just stripped it all away. A non dark DD film is just a pointless Spider-Man clone

And Marvel is a subsidiary of Disney....

Yes and Marvel makes Disney style films

You're right, I do remember watching Snow White and seeing all of New York blown up and one of the Dwarves getting stabbed in the heart and dying.

I didn't even mention the cartoons, your sarcasm is weak and immature 
#63 Posted by The Sadhu (853 posts) - - Show Bio

I would have watched this for sure!

#64 Posted by Shamelesslysupportinaznballers (553 posts) - - Show Bio

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

So it was produced by a subsidiary and not Disney. The current DD is generic as hell, Waid took everything that made Dardevil unique and just stripped it all away. A non dark DD film is just a pointless Spider-Man clone

And Marvel is a subsidiary of Disney....

Yes and Marvel makes Disney style films

You're right, I do remember watching Snow White and seeing all of New York blown up and one of the Dwarves getting stabbed in the heart and dying.

I didn't even mention the cartoons, your sarcasm is weak and immature

so is your ignorance

#65 Posted by Jonny_Anonymous (32935 posts) - - Show Bio
@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

So it was produced by a subsidiary and not Disney. The current DD is generic as hell, Waid took everything that made Dardevil unique and just stripped it all away. A non dark DD film is just a pointless Spider-Man clone

And Marvel is a subsidiary of Disney....

Yes and Marvel makes Disney style films

You're right, I do remember watching Snow White and seeing all of New York blown up and one of the Dwarves getting stabbed in the heart and dying.

I didn't even mention the cartoons, your sarcasm is weak and immature

so is your ignorance

And what ignorance would that be exactly?
#66 Posted by Shamelesslysupportinaznballers (553 posts) - - Show Bio

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

So it was produced by a subsidiary and not Disney. The current DD is generic as hell, Waid took everything that made Dardevil unique and just stripped it all away. A non dark DD film is just a pointless Spider-Man clone

And Marvel is a subsidiary of Disney....

Yes and Marvel makes Disney style films

You're right, I do remember watching Snow White and seeing all of New York blown up and one of the Dwarves getting stabbed in the heart and dying.

I didn't even mention the cartoons, your sarcasm is weak and immature

so is your ignorance

And what ignorance would that be exactly?

I'd explain it but i'm too immature to do so.

#67 Posted by inferiorego (21261 posts) - - Show Bio

I want that film to be made

Staff
#68 Posted by Miss_Garrick (1757 posts) - - Show Bio

Well, I loved hearing 70s music, and I do like having a comic book movie take place in an earlier decade (60s to 80s), but I'm not feeling any real interest.

I'm probably the only person to want this, but if I was doing a Daredevil film, I would have it roughly based when Stan Lee wrote the guy as being so upbeat and practically the only Marvel character in the early 60s to not have any ANGST in his life. Y'know, the way Daredevil was before Frank Miller got his claws on him.I would totally have Gladiator and Stil-Man make appearances. Again, just my opinion.

#69 Posted by Jonny_Anonymous (32935 posts) - - Show Bio
@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@Shamelesslysupportinaznballers said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

So it was produced by a subsidiary and not Disney. The current DD is generic as hell, Waid took everything that made Dardevil unique and just stripped it all away. A non dark DD film is just a pointless Spider-Man clone

And Marvel is a subsidiary of Disney....

Yes and Marvel makes Disney style films

You're right, I do remember watching Snow White and seeing all of New York blown up and one of the Dwarves getting stabbed in the heart and dying.

I didn't even mention the cartoons, your sarcasm is weak and immature

so is your ignorance

And what ignorance would that be exactly?

I'd explain it but i'm too immature to do so.

yes, yes you are
#70 Posted by erik_norris (191 posts) - - Show Bio

@Miss_Garrick said:

Well, I loved hearing 70s music, and I do like having a comic book movie take place in an earlier decade (60s to 80s), but I'm not feeling any real interest.

I'm probably the only person to want this, but if I was doing a Daredevil film, I would have it roughly based when Stan Lee wrote the guy as being so upbeat and practically the only Marvel character in the early 60s to not have any ANGST in his life. Y'know, the way Daredevil was before Frank Miller got his claws on him.I would totally have Gladiator and Stil-Man make appearances. Again, just my opinion.

I don't think you're alone. Why do you think so many people, myself included, love Mark Waid's current Daredevil series? It's fun, upbeat and stars an actual hero being heroic. I love me some dark DD (the Bendis run is my all-time favorite on the character), but the lighter tone version of the character currently running definitely works too.

Staff
#71 Edited by daredevil21134 (10965 posts) - - Show Bio

@erik_norris said:

@Miss_Garrick said:

Well, I loved hearing 70s music, and I do like having a comic book movie take place in an earlier decade (60s to 80s), but I'm not feeling any real interest.

I'm probably the only person to want this, but if I was doing a Daredevil film, I would have it roughly based when Stan Lee wrote the guy as being so upbeat and practically the only Marvel character in the early 60s to not have any ANGST in his life. Y'know, the way Daredevil was before Frank Miller got his claws on him.I would totally have Gladiator and Stil-Man make appearances. Again, just my opinion.

I don't think you're alone. Why do you think so many people, myself included, love Mark Waid's current Daredevil series? It's fun, upbeat and stars an actual hero being heroic. I love me some dark DD (the Bendis run is my all-time favorite on the character), but the lighter tone version of the character currently running definitely works too.

I couldn't watch a DD film based off of Mark Waid's DD run.I might as well just watch Spider-Man instead

#72 Posted by RedheadedAtrocitus (6885 posts) - - Show Bio

If anything, this little compilation more or less seems a tribute to Frank Miller's run on DD way back when just from the imagery we've seen here. Its awesome!

#73 Posted by Noctis (1396 posts) - - Show Bio

I'm glad the Daredevil is going back to Marvel.

#74 Posted by KamenRider00 (28 posts) - - Show Bio

At first I was sad that Marvel was getting the rights back, but now I'm sad that Joe Carnahan won't get to make his version of Daredevil. It looked great! A 70s Marvel shared universe would be pretty amazing though...

#75 Posted by SavageDragon (2248 posts) - - Show Bio

The Marvel cinematic universe is cool...This would be better.

#76 Posted by Xanni15 (6758 posts) - - Show Bio

I am actually looking forward to it going back to Marvel, I think they might have a slightly lighter DD for his first movie back but anything subsequent will be more mature and darker. I just look at Iron Man compared to the sequel, as well as Thor's portrayal in The Avengers compared to his own movie. The trailer wasn't bad but it wouldn't make it a must see in theaters, in my opinion.

#77 Posted by haydenclaireheroes (8905 posts) - - Show Bio

This could of been really interesting. It seemed like we could of actually seen a good betrayal of Daredevil

#78 Posted by daredevil21134 (10965 posts) - - Show Bio

@haydenclaireheroes said:

This could of been really interesting. It seemed like we could of actually seen a good betrayal of Daredevil

I agree

#79 Posted by Mega_spidey01 (3078 posts) - - Show Bio

@daredevil21134 said:

@haydenclaireheroes said:

This could of been really interesting. It seemed like we could of actually seen a good betrayal of Daredevil

I agree

it might make me interested in the character.

#80 Posted by kfhrfdu_89_76k (3720 posts) - - Show Bio

Hey! It`s Harvey Bullocks voice actor, Robert Costanzo, as the kingpin, apparently!

Well, would`ve been.

Cool.

#81 Posted by nrgb2814 (114 posts) - - Show Bio

That was flippin' sweet! I would see the crap out of that movie! But I am kind of glad Marvel is getting the rights back to one of their own characters.

#82 Posted by WaveMotionCannon (5199 posts) - - Show Bio
@Gambler

@G-Man said:

Man oh man, I would've totally watched that.

I was thinking the same thing.

Thos
#83 Posted by thespideyguy (2645 posts) - - Show Bio

I would've watched this twice in the movie theatres.

#84 Posted by CrimsonAvenger (1162 posts) - - Show Bio

Why did you only embed the PG-13 version?

#85 Posted by traecoffey (12 posts) - - Show Bio

bad song. it dont look like what marvel is doing now . it dose look like what wb is doing shit comic movies

#86 Posted by BiteMe-Fanboy (7601 posts) - - Show Bio

Meh...

#87 Posted by zombietag (1492 posts) - - Show Bio

1970s daredevil is a RAD idea

#88 Posted by RedOwl_1 (1664 posts) - - Show Bio

I hope Disney/Marvel come up with something better than this (not saying this is bad)

#89 Posted by ka385385 (1285 posts) - - Show Bio

That trailer looks...suck actully ,what's that weird music?

#90 Posted by Druid (104 posts) - - Show Bio

This Daredevil story would stand on it's own I think, like the Punisher movies. It's hard to determine how good it would turn out based solely on this video, but I think it has potential. I suppose Carnahan could also just make this movie and turn the daredevil character into some other super powered or in some other way significant protagonist. With Daredevil and Murdock's focus on enforcing the law and stopping criminals in the comic books, a film with the general feel of this trailer could definitely fit.

#91 Posted by SpideyIvyDaredevilFan26 (5923 posts) - - Show Bio

I loved the original, but I gotta say...I would pay 50$ to see that movie.

#92 Posted by Uncanny_XFactor (10 posts) - - Show Bio

Ugh, if only. Sure this wouldn't get as much bad publicity as Affleck's version, I'd pay good money to see this.

#93 Posted by daredevil21134 (10965 posts) - - Show Bio

It will get it's justice now

This edit will also create new pages on Comic Vine for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Comic Vine users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.