when do fox lose their rights on daredevil?
i think if marvel should make a new film it would be about his origins and his training it should also be cool if it featured the hand but maybe iy will look to much like batman begins then.

Why shouldn't they? Daredevil may not be as popular as the X-Men, but films have been made based on far more obscure sources and have proven to be successful and that's saying nothing about films that are completely original. With enough effort, and a decent cast and crew, they could probably make a successful film about the Skrull Kill Krew, if they really wanted to. I'd obviously prefer if it went to another studio, though. They've had like 6-10 decent films in the last decade or so, and really only a couple that were anywhere near great

Both Daredevil and Elektra movies need to be remade. Yeah, Ben Affleck did a good job to play Daredevil, but with him getting old and uninterested in playing superhero roles now, a reboot is the best COA. The same goes for Elektra.

" when do fox lose their rights on daredevil? i think if marvel should make a new film it would be about his origins and his training it should also be cool if it featured the hand but maybe iy will look to much like batman begins then. "

" @Loki9876 said:

" when do fox lose their rights on daredevil? i think if marvel should make a new film it would be about his origins and his training it should also be cool if it featured the hand but maybe iy will look to much like batman begins then. "

Fox renews the contract for 10 years as long as they make a movie within those said 10 years. So basically that can have them indefinitely.  This contract is the same for the Fantastic Four and X-men franchises. Which is why we will be seeing a Fantastic Four Reboot in due time.   This is just like the contract Sony has for Spider-man and Ghost Rider (Ghost Rider and Spider-man film coming out soon thus renewing the contract). But the sad thing is they don't need to actually make a good movie. When Fox was about to lose the rights they made the 1994 Fantastic Four which was made on a 4 million dollar budget and they had no plans of making it a theatrical release (which the actors and director did not have knowledge of). The movie bizz is cut-throat.  Also funny trivia is that Fox owns Kingpin so you won't see him in a Spider-man film, and  Marvel owns Electro and Chameleon so don't expect to see them in a Spider-man movie anytime soon. Electro and Chameleon were sold as character for Captain America for whatever reason to the previous owners of the rights that made the 1990 film.  "

Apparently, David Slade is set to direct the new daredevil.  
 
 http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=31328

" movie yes, comic series, no "

You should watch Daredevil: Director's Cut. The movie was fine. But Elektra was the worst.

"You should watch Daredevil: Director's Cut. The movie was fine. But Elektra was the worst. "

" @The Impersonator said:

"You should watch Daredevil: Director's Cut. The movie was fine. But Elektra was the worst. "

It was better then the original "

" @daredevil21134 said:

" @The Impersonator said:

"You should watch Daredevil: Director's Cut. The movie was fine. But Elektra was the worst. "

It was better then the original "

But not good enough that we don't need a reboot! "