@Black_Claw: If the film does well (which it probably will)

@batshrine said:

Wolverine is overexposed, Batman can't be exposed enough :-P. But seriously though if anyone is overexposed its the Joker...

<3

What a rubbish thread.

@John Valentine: care to explain?

Do we think he might might become overexposed? I think we've already passed this point. Don't get me wrong, I'd be happy for an infinite number of Batman comics as long as they were quality, but I'm afraid DC isn't quite doing great with all the titles. Also, there are actually six Batman solo comics counting Legends of the Dark Knight.

@John Valentine said:

What a rubbish thread.

Not at all. Why do you say that?

Batman is the best, why de-comission him though

Batman has been in the superhero top 3 since 1940!!! No way Wolverine could ever be as overexposed as Batman already has been.

@turoksonofstone: and he has been the top superhero since 1960's (in sales and popularity, I mean there is a reason why Diamond compares comic sales to Batman.

@DeathpooltheT1000 said:

Ar you kidding me, Wolverine outside of comics has been in 4 X Men movies an 2 of his own.

Had been like in 5 tv shows and other things.

Noy even Batman can beat Omnipresent Wolverine, he is everywhere.

Yes he can, he's been in 8 Movies, a Live Action TV series, and several Animated series, as well as Animated films, so I'd say he's been used more in media than Wolverine.

Also I don't care if the companies milk them, I'll just not get anything if I think it's crap

@johnkmccubbin91 said:

@DeathpooltheT1000 said:

Ar you kidding me, Wolverine outside of comics has been in 4 X Men movies an 2 of his own.

Had been like in 5 tv shows and other things.

Noy even Batman can beat Omnipresent Wolverine, he is everywhere.

Yes he can, he's been in 8 Movies, a Live Action TV series, and several Animated series, as well as Animated films, so I'd say he's been used more in media than Wolverine.

Also I don't care if the companies milk them, I'll just not get anything if I think it's crap

Batman is older that Wolverine, so he is obviously going to have more tv shows and movies, still you have to notice that in less time Wolverine has been part of 6 movies and like 5 tv shows.

If the numbers dont fail me if Wolverine and Batman were equally old, Wolverine would had been in like 18 movies and 15 tv shows.

@jobbernos said:

@moywar700 said:

he has already have been more exposed than wolverine.

No because Batman has a supporting cast that rivals his own appeal, Wolverine is just Wolverine.

@King of the Vines said:

No because Batman has a supporting cast that rivals his own appeal, Wolverine is just Wolverine.

mmm

In Movies Batman is overused because that it seems that Hollywood only knows how to use Batman in DC. Superman is the second the others it just plane roulette. They are close to getting Catwoman but as I said it long way to go. Holly wood need to know they should not have closure to everything some things do happen for no reason.

Marvel still needs work as well. It took three Captain America movies to get his character right. They nearly blew it in the third Spiderman movie and the fourth they did horridly.

In live action TV series. They fail to get powers accurate or fail what the character is suppose to represent. We need to make easy guide for them. Did anyone make forum of that?

@DeathpooltheT1000 said:

@johnkmccubbin91 said:

@DeathpooltheT1000 said:

Ar you kidding me, Wolverine outside of comics has been in 4 X Men movies an 2 of his own.

Had been like in 5 tv shows and other things.

Noy even Batman can beat Omnipresent Wolverine, he is everywhere.

Yes he can, he's been in 8 Movies, a Live Action TV series, and several Animated series, as well as Animated films, so I'd say he's been used more in media than Wolverine.

Also I don't care if the companies milk them, I'll just not get anything if I think it's crap

Batman is older that Wolverine, so he is obviously going to have more tv shows and movies, still you have to notice that in less time Wolverine has been part of 6 movies and like 5 tv shows.

If the numbers dont fail me if Wolverine and Batman were equally old, Wolverine would had been in like 18 movies and 15 tv shows.

No he wouldn't have because Marvel didn't start making films till 2000 anyway, but I get what you mean

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

If it wasn't for the hundreds of Bat books think of all the characters that could get ongoings

None.

@entropy_aegis said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

If it wasn't for the hundreds of Bat books think of all the characters that could get ongoings

None.

actually yes.

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@entropy_aegis said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

If it wasn't for the hundreds of Bat books think of all the characters that could get ongoings

None.

actually yes.

Actually no,there are not hundreds of Batbooks first and foremost,Batman himself has always starred in 2 books(Batman and Tec) and he's also had atleast 2 others from the 80's and onwards.Right now he stars in 5 books,in 2 of those Damian is a co-star.

Not counting JL.

DC has given lots of characters a chance with the New-52,it's not Batman's fault that Mr Terrific or Firestorm didn't do well.

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@entropy_aegis said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

If it wasn't for the hundreds of Bat books think of all the characters that could get ongoings

None.

actually yes.

Actually no,there are not hundreds of Batbooks first and foremost,Batman himself has always starred in 2 books(Batman and Tec) and he's also had atleast 2 others from the 80's and onwards.Right now he stars in 5 books,in 2 of those Damian is a co-star.

Not counting JL.

DC has given lots of characters a chance with the New-52,it's not Batman's fault that Mr Terrific or Firestorm didn't do well.

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@entropy_aegis said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

@entropy_aegis said:

@Jonny_Anonymous said:

If it wasn't for the hundreds of Bat books think of all the characters that could get ongoings

None.

actually yes.

Actually no,there are not hundreds of Batbooks first and foremost,Batman himself has always starred in 2 books(Batman and Tec) and he's also had atleast 2 others from the 80's and onwards.Right now he stars in 5 books,in 2 of those Damian is a co-star.

Not counting JL.

DC has given lots of characters a chance with the New-52,it's not Batman's fault that Mr Terrific or Firestorm didn't do well.

clearly exaggeration is lost on you

Maybe it is,but Batman is not responsible for the rest of DC.Your argument may hold some weight when it comes to adaptations but in the comics less Batman doesn't mean more something else.

As much as I try to keep Bat-wank to a minimum when I'm around, I don't think Batman can be overexposed. Batman is part of yhe face of DC, has been for decades. Wolverine is just the cash cow of yhe X-Men franchise, not all of Marvel.

@moywar700 said:

he has already have been more exposed than wolverine.

what he said