What's wrong with an older Batman?

#1 Posted by soduh2 (958 posts) - - Show Bio

Part of the reason for the reboot was that the previous timeline made Batman kind of old. Factor in Bruce's time with each Robin, his solo years, recovering from Bane breaking his back, dying in after final crisis, and the amount of training he had in the beginning; Bruce would be at least in his late 30s in the "current" timeline. The Reboot puts him in his early 30s. My question is, however, what's wrong with an old(er) Batman? It makes more sense that an older bats would have a part in the trinity along side Wondy and Supes, because his experience makes up for what he lacks in power. They could have kept the seven year timeline and left Bruce (and the Batman series) alone. What do you all think? Does Batman need to be younger?

#2 Posted by davelecave (1123 posts) - - Show Bio

Absolutely nothing.

#3 Posted by Suprman (458 posts) - - Show Bio

Again, Nothing wrong with an older batman.

#4 Posted by TheCrowbar (4397 posts) - - Show Bio

DC Editorial. They should just let Scott Synder do w/e he wants. Especially after Court of Owls.

#5 Posted by theTimeStreamer (2845 posts) - - Show Bio

@TheCrowbar: not after that piss-poor ending

#6 Posted by FatihBATMAN (1395 posts) - - Show Bio

Hmm..for me a young Bruce is the best..

An older Bruce would be kind of a bad psychological thing for me...in my head I would think he wouldnt be as fit etc.

#7 Posted by TheCrowbar (4397 posts) - - Show Bio

@theTimeStreamer: You didn't like the reveal or was there an epilogue issue I missed? I loved it. I loved not knowing if it's true or not.

#8 Posted by danhimself (21258 posts) - - Show Bio

I always thought of Bruce being in his early to mid 30's in the pre 52 anyway

#9 Posted by theTimeStreamer (2845 posts) - - Show Bio

@TheCrowbar: the reveal was meh. the battle between them thats what pissed me off. i know batman has PIS coming out of every oriffice but he should have died or not been able to do 80% of the things he did in the issue. too much.

#10 Posted by Rumble Man (11198 posts) - - Show Bio

@TheCrowbar said:

DC Editorial.

They are cancerous, and for some reason they hate cass & steph

#11 Posted by SupBatz (2022 posts) - - Show Bio

I like it when they don't really focus on the ages of the characters. It makes it easier on characters whose stories have been going on for 70+ years to never give specific time frames (such as rather than having an issue flashback say "6 years ago..." just say "Years ago...").

I always imagine Batman to be early 30's-ish when it comes to physique but I don't really try to account for the timeline so long as the stories are good.

#12 Posted by Hazlenaut (2096 posts) - - Show Bio

With amount of things he has done and has been through allot so 40 or more sounds more possible.

#13 Posted by Crash_Recovery (855 posts) - - Show Bio

@davelecave said:

Absolutely nothing.


Dark Knight Returns is considered one of the best Batman stories, and it stars an older Batman.

Batman Beyond and The Dark Knight rises both also feature a Bruce Wayne towards the end of his career. Batman is one of the most versatile concepts in comics, and can "work" in so many ways.

#14 Posted by DarKnightNoir (45 posts) - - Show Bio

What's appealing about a younger Batman is that he can make mistakes. Sometimes he fumbles through things a little. He hasn't reached that "Bat-God" level of badass that we see in Batman R.I.P., or even Court of Cowls. Interestingly enough, I think the same thing made Dick Grayson an interesting Batman. The guy just isn't a Bruce Wayne. One thing that bums me about the reboot is that we don't get to see Grayson in that role anything. I think there was a lot of juice left in that.

#15 Posted by ThanosIsMad (2260 posts) - - Show Bio

@danhimself said:

I always thought of Bruce being in his early to mid 30's in the pre 52 anyway

By the time it was all said and done, he was probably pushing 40 since you have to factor in the year/year and a half he was dead. Even as an early 30 year old, you could squeeze in the huge beats of his adventures. Have him graduate school early and wander around the world at 16, have come come back at 19 or 20, and have him be Batman for 10-13 years and you can squeeze in every single sidekick and his son with them having a decent period for training and actual adventures.

#16 Posted by Saucedo17 (137 posts) - - Show Bio

So long the story are good I don't care.

#17 Posted by mrdecepticonleader (19276 posts) - - Show Bio

Nothing is wrong with an older Batman.

His age isn't really that important unless you want to get a grasp of how long he has been Batman.

I know in year one he started out as Batman at the age of 25 so I like to think he has been going for at least ten years making him at least 35, that's around the standard age for Batman too.

This edit will also create new pages on Comic Vine for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Comic Vine users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.