The sonic gun,over heat device,subsonic emitters and sonic grenades seem more like special equipment than standard ones TBH.
Those Superman scans are from the back ups in Batman right? haven't read the book since DOTF.
Me neither.
Character » Batman appears in 23646 issues.
The sonic gun,over heat device,subsonic emitters and sonic grenades seem more like special equipment than standard ones TBH.
Those Superman scans are from the back ups in Batman right? haven't read the book since DOTF.
Me neither.
@omnicrono: nice one quoting a 4 month old post I already addressed...
So because you addressed it, that means nobody else can quote it or agree with it?
Real classy. lol
I like it, I have always preferred Justice League level Batman. The suit makes him even more of a beast.
Same. It so much better. It gets back at the bat haters that say;"It's unrealistic to have a human on the Justice League." I really have a problem with people that read comics, and then have a problems with the realism.
@lifeofvibe: Ya i dont get it ether maybe if the force of the blast knocked him off the car i could understand but he looked pretty hurt for just getting hit by a shot gun
@modernww2fare: really? name one thing that is excessive
on more gadget to add from Batman and Two-face it is kind of a bolo type weapon that fires from his gauntlet that wraps around its targets
i was also thinking about counting the guantlet device from The Dark Knight that fires a ton of mini-batarangs but it didnt seem to do anything
@modernww2fare: really? name one thing that is excessive
Everything. I still can't see how he's so much more "relateable" than Superman when he's at the very limit of human capabilities, almost becoming another ironman.
@modernww2fare: just sounds like you complaining becuase you dont like Batman
@lordofthenorth: except I do like Batman, even though he's not my favorite hero.
@modernww2fare: you dont seem like it. Evey time i have seen you comment its becuase you have something negitive to say about Batman or his fans
@modernww2fare: you dont seem like it. Evey time i have seen you comment its becuase you have something negitive to say about Batman or his fans
give me examples
@omnicrono: nice one quoting a 4 month old post I already addressed...
So because you addressed it, that means nobody else can quote it or agree with it?
Real classy. lol
I think the point was that since you didn't gave any new aspects to the post it was unnecessary because it wasn't useful.
@modernww2fare: easy i dont even have to go any where right here on this forum
"Jesus Christ! He's only one step away from being Ironman" and when i asked what was excessive you said "Everything. I still can't see how he's so much more "relateable" than Superman when he's at the very limit of human capabilities, almost becoming another ironman."
In both these comments you gave no explaintion of your stance thus coming off as a person just looking to bash batman rather than actually making a point
@omnicrono: nice one quoting a 4 month old post I already addressed...
So because you addressed it, that means nobody else can quote it or agree with it?
Real classy. lol
I think the point was that since you didn't gave any new aspects to the post it was unnecessary because it wasn't useful.
No, I don't at all think that that is what he meant. But that is beside the point. People quote, re-post, and "co-sign" comments, both old and new, all the time. What I did wasn't something new, out of the ordinary, or inappropriate.
The simple fact of the matter is that he probably just didn't like that I agreed with what was said, so he sought to discredit my post as somehow being bad form, which is nonsense.
EDIT: If you don't like it when someone re-posts an old comment, (whether you think it was a useful quotation or not), that is fine. But please do not presume to suggest that someone cannot second an opinion or look to support/reinforce one that somebody has already shared merely because it didn't offer anything "new."
@omnicrono: nice one quoting a 4 month old post I already addressed...
So because you addressed it, that means nobody else can quote it or agree with it?
Real classy. lol
I think the point was that since you didn't gave any new aspects to the post it was unnecessary because it wasn't useful.
No, I don't at all think that that is what he meant. But that is beside the point. People quote, re-post, and "co-sign" comments, both old and new, all the time. What I did wasn't something new, out of the ordinary, or inappropriate.
The simple fact of the matter is that he probably just didn't like that I agreed with what was said, so he tried to discredit my comment as somehow being bad form, which is nonsense.
quoting something that is wrong after it was already explained to be wrong in a thread that was 4 months old is pretty pointless actually
@omnicrono: nice one quoting a 4 month old post I already addressed...
So because you addressed it, that means nobody else can quote it or agree with it?
Real classy. lol
I think the point was that since you didn't gave any new aspects to the post it was unnecessary because it wasn't useful.
No, I don't at all think that that is what he meant. But that is beside the point. People quote, re-post, and "co-sign" comments, both old and new, all the time. What I did wasn't something new, out of the ordinary, or inappropriate.
The simple fact of the matter is that he probably just didn't like that I agreed with what was said, so he tried to discredit my comment as somehow being bad form, which is nonsense.
quoting something that is wrong after it was already explained to be wrong in a thread that was 4 months old is pretty pointless actually
Actually, it isn't.
First of all, this is pretty much all subjective opinion. There isn't much "right" or "wrong" about anything that is said here when discussing hypothetical scenarios about fictional characters.
Secondly, that being said, you'd have to be a pretty arrogant person to believe that your opinion is the only right opinion. Which, apparently you are that type of person?
Once again - real classy.
The more I read the less I start to like Batman
LOL, I know that feeling.
The more I read the less I start to like Batman
LOL, I know that feeling.
Despite you don't read Batman,right? How can someone have opinion of something that doesn't know a thing about it?
@matchesmalone21: I'm just joking.
@wolverine08: Sorry.....
@dmreyn: I'm pretty sure his suit would most likely be impossible to make, due to issues of members of his company discovering embezzlement of funds for such a complicated piece of technology(It's no longer even classified as a costume, as it's piratically just an over-sized gadget. And honestly, who can wear something like that, and be able to perform back flips and move as easily as he does?
@slayerofevil: It's a light eazy material (confirmed in John Layman's Detective comics)and most of this thing Batman already have in pre-flashpoint stories. Have people pay attention to pre-flashpoint stories? As pre-flashpoint stories Bruce builded with his own money.
So explain how Moon Knight does the same stuff with adamantium based suit...?
@matchesmalone21: I've seen you use the information on this page multiple times, to get your point across. Keep up the good work man.
@matchesmalone21: Light fabric with circuits in it? How the hell does that all even work? Can you even imagine how expensive that shit must be, on top of all his other suits? Why hasn't anyone caught him for embezzlement?
@slayerofevil: 1. Bruce is from one of the oldest and richest families in the world we are talking billions of dollers here so inculding the money he gains from his company he has plenty of cash.
2. Bruce is a genious so he builds most of his tech so he dosnt have to pay an wages so his costs are only material goods and time. as well he dosnt have to conform to any safety standards besides his own. So all togather his costs are minamal
@slayerofevil: Do you have read about nanotechnology? is a real world technology that is about microcircuits,nanobots,nanocameras...
@slayerofevil: im young so ahem whats embezzlement?
@tupiaz: @johnni_kun: @jonny_anonymous: @wolverine08: @attatje: @patrat18: @lordofthenorth: @lifeofvibe: More gadgets!!
Micro flashbangs
I might be in the minority here, but I think it's a little excessive. Even though batman almost always wins, I've always liked knowing in the back of min that he's still vulnerable, that he can always lose if he messes up even by a bit. Now he's got so many damn gadgets in his suit it makes you wonder whether he needs to use the bat cave for anything. He's the bat form of R2D2. Hell, add some laser blaster and he might as well be iron man. I'm just now getting into new52 with the most recent detective comics plus zero year, but hearing this makes me a little disappointed. I've always liked batman because he was batMAN, not batROBOT.
I prefer a much, err, less advanced Batsuit. I prefer the Batsuit to be able to do the following:
Gadgets
I prefer a much, err, less advanced Batsuit. I prefer the Batsuit to be able to do the following:
Gadgets
Nice.
I just noticed now that New 52 Bats and Supes look a hell lot like the Titans of Tomorrow:
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/scale_super/6/62058/1265896-teen_titans___titans_of_tomorrow.jpg
Not just the belts and underwear-less-ness, but even the seams are kinda the same on Batman when Tomorrow Batman is drawn in detail. Kinda weird since the Titans of Tomorrow are evil.
Ban guys could still shoot him in his Bat mouth
As Batman never dodge close range bullets before...LOL
Ban guys could still shoot him in his Bat mouth
As Batman never dodge close range bullets before...LOL
He did, normal bullets, and sniper bullets as well..actually i think his Reaction Time might be on pair with Cassandra's, or possibly even higher, but Cassie is overall faster.
With this new suit, Batman should be nearly un-touchable, for non-superpowered characters...but his fight with Lady Shiva on Nightwing #0 when Shiva managed to severely damage the suit, with some shurikens, and really hurt him, kinda of makes me wonder, if the suit's durabillity changes from writter, to writter...or it's really the new status quo.
With this new suit, Batman should be nearly un-touchable, for non-superpowered characters...but his fight with Lady Shiva on Nightwing #0 when Shiva managed to severely damage the suit, with some shurikens, and really hurt him, kinda of makes me wonder, if the suit's durabillity changes from writter, to writter...or it's really the new status quo.
We don't know from which material Lady Shiva's shuriken is made...so obviously some materials are capable to pierce the suit.
With this new suit, Batman should be nearly un-touchable, for non-superpowered characters...but his fight with Lady Shiva on Nightwing #0 when Shiva managed to severely damage the suit, with some shurikens, and really hurt him, kinda of makes me wonder, if the suit's durabillity changes from writter, to writter...or it's really the new status quo.
We don't know from which material Lady Shiva's shuriken is made...so obviously some materials are capable to pierce the suit.
Yeah, i guess.
@bat_girl_cc: The suit's capabilities probably weren't established that well yet. His suit could just not be able to take incredibly sharp weapons. Plus it was in Nightwing after all. I find it strange that you'd say Batman's reaction time is better than Cass's...even though I think that might be due to his experience dodging them. He has been doing it longer.
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Comic Vine for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Comic Vine users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment