@FadeToBlackBolt said:
I hate threads where the answer is as simple as;
READ THE DAMN COMIC
Woah easy Tiger.
You're not wrong however as all 3 points have pretty much been answered in the comics, but it's fun to hammer these things out anyway and less work than going through backissues.
Anyway back to the topic.
Now I'm going to contradict what I just said... OP I urge you to read (the DAMN COMIC! , j/k :P) the conversation Bruce has with Jezebel about being rich and philanthropy etc, it's brief but gets the point across. It's in Batman & Son (I think it's B&S... Ninja Manbats show up if that helps any)
Also you need to understand that Bruce and Wayne Enterprises are a single entity economically, look at real world examples of philanthropic rich dudes who own mulitnational corporations, Branson and Virgin for example, it's far more complex an issue than you are painting it.
Why doesn't Tony Stark do the same?
Hell, why doesn't superman just crush piles of coal into diamonds and make everybody on the planet a millionaire? (once again I direct you to Bruce and Jezebel at the art show).
On the armor question, fair enough, you understand the suit and it's various functions... But I think you don't quite understand the man wearing it.
The answer is nothing to do with the practicalities of crimefighting and everything to do with the psychology of the man himself.
Bruce and the city, Batman and the myth he has created.
You should reread act one of Year one.
He has created this icon, this creature... Most street level thugs don't even think he's human, they think he's a monster, a shade, a demon.
He could wear armor and hover in the air on jetboots and zap all the bad guys with stun rays or rapid fire batarangs shooting out of his gauntlets ( where have we seen that before?).
But then he's just a man in an armored suit... No longer a myth, no longer seemingly doing the impossible, no longer more than a man (I know it seems like a self contradicting statement, Batman in powered armor becomes more human and ergo more vulnerable in his enemies eyes but think about it).
Not only that but you have to understand the violence inherent in Wayne's personality... He likes to get down in the dirt, he likes to use his hands, to feel the battle up close.
He likes to use the skills he has, he likes to push himself to the limit, he likes to take the hard path, that's a basic Batman trait.
In short, I suspect Bruce would feel that the use of such an augmented suit as standard practice would make him soft.
He has augmented armors aplenty and if needed he has no issues using them (as we've seen many times) it's just that 99% of the time... He simply doesn't need it.
On to the final point, Bruce recruiting and equipping adult allies with power armor.
First of all (and this goes back to my first point about sidekicks in my earlier post) Bruce has never ever asked for help, in fact (and please correct me if I'm wrong) up until Batman INC, Bruce has never directly sought to recruit anyone, except Jason Todd. (at this point I give you a meaningful look -.-)
The Batman effect people often cite as the cause of super-villains in Gotham also applies to heroes imo.
But that aside, he already has a large network of adult allies both in Gotham and on call to help Gotham.
Huntress, Ragman, that bald assassin chick, Babs, Dick etc, plenty more I can't think of right off the bat (pun!) I'm sure.
Remember the 'network' that came together to defend Gotham after Final Crisis?
Anyway, I suspect if Bruce approached them with suits of power armor they'd politely decline (Imagine Dick wearing power armor? He could barely tolerate a cape!), they have their own styles and abilities.
(Although to be fair, I never understood why Babs didn't wear exoskeleton support on her legs at least).
Also you said instead of training them for 7 years or whatever he could just give them the armor...
Are you crazy? They'd be dead on their first night out.
Training for that kind of lifestyle is not just about causing destruction or beating people down... There is just as much mental preparation and discipline required to survive that kind of life, arguably far more than the physical requirements... Just look at poor old Jason.
btw, is the correct spelling "armour" or "armor"? Because I always spell it "armour" but google spellcheck is busting me over it.
Anyway... your turn OP. :)
Log in to comment