I dont know If you guys care or not, but I threw this together real quick

Cool.

Not bad at all, amigo :) I like how the logos are interconnected.

Though I would think that Cavil should get top-star billing, as it is MOS 2 and not a Bat-film

@sinestro_gl: Everyone says that haha, I should have thought that threw but I was tired.

..."World's Finest" imo. Simple. Iconic. Powerful.

@fallschirmjager: Agreed. Batman vs. Superman just sounds kind of dumb, especially since they'll probably fight like one time, and then just spend the entire movie suspicious of each other until the end when they become friends.

I am the only person that hates Superman next movie is going to be with Batman.

I mean, why cant this movie be his own thing?

You know, out of the Man of Steel Trilogy.

Also, if Batman movies were called The Dark Knight and Superman Man of Steel, what is with the terrible VS name.

It sound like Marvel Vs Capcom, if Marvel vs Capcom sound dumb and dumber every second.

Also they are called World Finest.

I mean is MOS 3 going to be Superman vs Batman vs Wonder Woman.

Or better JL to be called Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, Flash and Aquaman Vs some villain or villains.

Better than the logo at comic-con

If only it said "Man of Steel: World's Finest"

Lol, very awesome logo brah

The movie is not going to be called MoS 2, its a Batman/Superman movie.

if anyone cares I have the logo without text.

@dylanofearth2: Great. Get rid of the man of steel 2 part and make it as Worlds Finest

The logo is great, just that its not a Superman movie anymore, its a Batman/Superman movie.

Explain that to Zach Snyed and David S Goyer, also the WB studios.

Why should I explain it to them, they already know this.

@rustyroy: Actually they are calling this a MOS sequel and Mos 2, its part of the MOS trilogy.

So i dont think they know.

@deathpoolthet1000: No, David Goyer said that it will probably be called Batman vs. Superman, maybe they will change it later but it will certainly would not be called MoS 2 and of course it will be a part of MoS just like the MCU is interconnected, I don't remember someone calling the Avengers Iron Man and friends.

If it were me, I wold also call it worlds finest, but the title batman vs superman attracts more people to the theater.

I do remember people calling it that and calling it Ironman 3.

No is not, Avengers is his own trilogy this is seen like part of the MOS franchise, not as part of a cinematic universe.

DC dont dare to dream bigger.

Maybe a few people called it back then but no one calls them tat now.

This will become a cinematic universe, that's why the inclusion of Batman and we'll also get a JL movie.

Why shouldn't they?

I just don't like the idea that superman might have to share his archenemy with batman. If lex is the villain then the movie should focus more on superman.

The villain hasn't been announced yet, I think it should be a team up of a Batvillain and a supervillain, like Lex and Ra's.

Because Batman had his own trilogy and is tim eto sombody else get the chance to get movies from, dont get me wrong i want Batman with Superman, but since TDK Trilogy was a bigger hit that MOS, Batman could look bigger that Superman and look like he is trying to save his friend franchise and making him live in the BatShadow.

I hate Dick, Jason and Tim live in there and i would hate even more if Clark had to live there too.

You're making it sound like Superman won't get a solo movie after this, if anything Superman's next solo movie will do much better after BvS, look at how IM 3 did after Avengers, it did more than the first 2 movies combined, and you're also making it sound like a drama movie, WB just wanted an answer for Avengers 2, that's why batman is there, he's not there to make Superman live in the Batshadow.

Not bad

@deathpoolthet1000 said:

Here here

Ill be pissed if they count this as a Superman sequel, the only way way I would count this as a sequel is if Goyer and Zack stick to their guns and make Superman beat Batman, I dont care if Batman saves Superman at the end but I want Superman to win first. But I would like to have my cake and eat too so I would like both a separate trilogy and a batman beat down,

@rustyroy: MOS wasnt the huge hit they belive it was going to be, it had mixed review and people reaction was also mixed.

It looks weird no one talked about this movie when MOS was going to came out, they talked about the sequel or JL, they even talked of MOS 2 before making the xover with other characters.

Besides WB talked they didnt wanted to reboot Batman too fast and talked of Beyond so they didnt had to reboot Bruce, now they take out this plan and decide to reboot.

All after Superman wasnt the huge hit everybody belive it was going to be, suddenly they forget all they said and decide to reboot Batman realy, really fast.

Also that they care what Marvel is doing make things worst.

@deathpoolthet1000:

MOS wasnt the huge hit they belive it was going to be, it had mixed review and people reaction was also mixed.

This is one of the reason Batman is in the movie, he's addition will help both the movie and Superman's next solo outing. Look at how well IM 3 did after the Avengers came out, if IM 3 came out directly after IM 2 then it would've made less than both IM 1 and IM 2.

Also that they care what Marvel is doing make things worst.

There care about the competition, there's a reason WB is one of the biggest if not the biggest Hollywood Studio.