@royale_with_cheese said:
@Redberry: I haven't put words into your mouth, rather, you've taken my posts out of context (and possibly to heart). The point is that they are putting gay characters in comics for no reasons. The greatest example of this is what D.C has decided to do with Alan Scott's history.
"Now you're treating the gays as if their sexual orientation defines them"
I feel like you're making an assumption about me, and it wasn't my intention at all regarding what you said. In a context of a debate, it was just my statement to tell you to focus on the objectivity of the debate. The debate will become subjective if speakers start to talk about each other instead of the comments at hand. That is all.
I don't take things to heart. It's just a forum debate after all. I stated my opinions calmly without insulting you, so I don't know where you're getting that idea from. I have explained why I said you're putting words into my mouth, and it wasn't meant to be an attack at all.
James Robinson thinks that a reboot of Alan Scott as gay is necessary then it's his decision. Personally, I don't think he's based that decision on monetary gain or creating buzz for the series. he has gay characters a long time ago, and he lives in San Francisco. He seems like a pretty liberal guy. If he thinks making Alan gay is good for Earth-2 then I don't think there is nothing we can do about it. I guess I can see why people think it's unnecessary. You're not wrong to be upset because they change an aspect of who he is. I understand all that. I personally like the change, so I can be biased about the subject. There are two sides on this issue. I guess in the end, if you like the book then support it, if you don't, then just skip over it. I think it's a good book, so people shouldn't let it bother them so much. It's also related to something we talk about before, homosexuality doesn't define a gay person.
Log in to comment