Comic Vine News

280 Comments

Why Can't Wonder Woman Have a New Costume?

Neither Superman nor Batman's "classic" costumes are their originals, but any attempt to alter Wonder Woman's even slightly is met with widespread outcry. Why?

Take a good look at Superman or Batman's original, 1930s costumes. They're completely different from either their current incarnation or even what most consider their "classic" looks. Now look at Wonder Woman's. In sixty years, not one stitch is different.

Batman and Superman both have established costumes that are considered their "classics," for Supes it is, more or less, his Silver Age costume. The darker blue, the larger symbol, the red and gold are all completely iconic, much moreso than his original look. For Batman it gets a little more complex as his Neal Adams incarnation is usually the go-to for the look, even if the color palette and bat-symbol have changed.

And there was some backlash for these, and especially for the most recent, changes. But nothing compared to the vitriolic, frothing rage that accompanied a short jacket and pants for Wonder Woman's out-dated look. So much so that DC actually rolled back to it and kept it through the New-52 relaunch. But why her? Why is it SO important for Wonder Woman to keep that look? Well the sad truth may be: it's all she's got.

If it weren't for the coloration and style, could you even tell when this was drawn?
If it weren't for the coloration and style, could you even tell when this was drawn?
== TEASER ==
Pictured: Not even a good idea at the time
Pictured: Not even a good idea at the time

Quick! Name the most influential Batman story ever written! Not necessarily the best, but the one that defines who Bats is in the modern world. Did you say Long Halloween? Maybe Hush? Dark Knight Returns? Maybe Death in the Family if you've forgotten Joker becoming the ambassador to Iran?

How about Supes? It gets a little tougher because, in my opinion, Superman is just about toughest character to write for in all of comics. But you've still got Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?, Superman For All Seasons, or Birthright.

Now quick: name the one arc that totally defines the character of Wonder Woman. I'm so into comics that I've opened a store AND write about them for a living, and I can't answer that question. The current New-52 incarnation is actually one of the best, most solid pieces of character-defining writing the character has ever received and while Straczynski had an epic run, I would say that as a character nothing really happened to Wonder Woman herself. It seems to be the same reason we can't get a WW movie, despite he being one of the "Big 3" of DC. I also just this second realized that she doesn't have a proper nickname like "Bats" and "Supes." Or "The Dark Knight" and "The Blue Boyscout." Or "The Bat" and "The Man of Steel."

To go off on a slight, but related, tangent: Red Letter Media recently completed a masterful deconstruction of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. In it, the salient point was made that, despite the great movies and fond memories: Jones isn't in any way an interesting character. This was driven home by the host's hypothetical situation that if Jones' trademark fedora, leather jacket and whip were removed, what would set the character apart from the myriad other pulp adventurers? As much fun as those movies are, and I personally enjoy the first three very much, it's very true: Indiana Jones is defined more by his appearance than by his personality. And the same could be said of Wonder Woman. She's never had a writer with a steady enough hand to really nail down what makes her HER. One arc has her as a tough-as-nails warrior who has no time for petty concerns and others have her as a more nurturing, motherly figure trying to protect everyone she can.

Pictured: A reasonable evolution.
Pictured: A reasonable evolution.

Putting aside her BDSM-laden origin, (ah, phrases you only hear in comics) which was also titanically sexist, what defines Wonder Woman that doesn't define a myriad of other heroes? Determination? Easily the most generic personality trait to ascribe to a superhero. Caring? Is she? She's often portrayed much more as a militaristic-minded, hardened fighter.

I'm sure the comment section of this very article will provide many traits that could accurately describe Wonder Woman, but I wonder how many will be contradictory and from storylines that are relatively close together.

We've seen Diana get an update with the latest issue of her title, but this feels much more like a temporary thing, though personally I think it could stand to stick around for awhile. With Carol Danvers getting an amazing, modern redesign, isn't it about time to retire the 1930s-style one-piece swimsuit for female superheroes? Isn't it time for Wonder Woman's costume to evolve along with her character?

280 Comments

Avatar image for netshyster
Netshyster

271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@netshyster: Id see a eye doctor cause on those images she's not wearing bikini bottoms..

That's what I said isn't it?

"The exact same outfit with a skirt instead"

I just don't understand what makes you think having her wear a skirt is any better than the "bikini bottoms" as you put it.

Avatar image for the_stegman
the_stegman

41911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

the_stegman  Moderator

@the_stegman said:

I just want her to have a Greek battle skirt or something, it would look better than the bikini shorts.

There's nothing wrong with her costume. I don't see why folks are complaining.

People are complaining because they don't have the exact same taste as you perhaps? Didn't say her current outfit is bad, said I'd like the skirt more.

Avatar image for netshyster
Netshyster

271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@justthatkid: I hear what you're saying but I think it's a mistake to start clothing her in Greek battle attire because it's just going to kill her distinct visual style. Greek skirt here, body armour there and a shiny golden helmet to top it off and what are you going to be left with other than a generic Greek foot soldier in gaudy armour; Where's Wonder Woman gone?


Avatar image for scorpio_cassadine
SCORPIO_CASSADINE

2139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@justthatkid said:

@netshyster:

No disrespect but I don't see why a warrior connect to Greek mythology would not have more of a warrior presence I just think the battle skirt adds more of a iconic feel to her original appearance which had a skirt also the battle skirt is just more of a modified look.

The Battle skirt also serves as a representation to her origin it makes her look more like a warrior in my opinion the bikini bottoms doesn't do that in my opinion.

I have to problem with the Top my beef is her bottoms, which I think most characters shouldn't use especially Wonder Woman, Superman and Batman lost their briefs why give Wonder Woman a pair.

You're not giving her anything, that's what she wears. It's what she's worn for 50 years. Her swimsuit is iconic. How many other super-heroines wear one?

Avatar image for xaos
Xaos

1126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

One of the problem is that she's too notorious to change without raising ragers. She would need an awesome story arc of really massive implication to introduce a new costume.

Otherwise, the change is doomed to failed because people will saw this as a fake event.

Avatar image for rubear
Rubear

4819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Rubear

Because she don't need one.
Dixi.
By the way the whole whimper about sexism is exactly it - whimper.

Avatar image for netshyster
Netshyster

271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rubear: "Because she don't need one"

100% in agreement with you there and if they did change it, what would they change it too? If the best they can do is to put her in Greek battle armour then I say leave well enough alone because that's a pointless change.

Avatar image for rustyroy
RustyRoy

16610

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By RustyRoy
This looks like good redesign
This looks like good redesign

Avatar image for csg_cl
CSG_CL

3234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@netshyster: WW's had appearance where she is in a battle skirt giving her could fit in with her in comic blue bottom and star spangled attire it's nothing like adding a unnecessary battle helmet for a casual appearance.

@scorpio_cassadine: Her first appearance has her in a skirt...

Superman's panties were iconic but in necessity they modernized his suit and he has no underwear and I think it would be more iconic for him to keep it rather then WW. Same with Batman.

that's a bit of a misleading statement ... since when her first appearance happened that skirt was a much more scandalous outfit than even her tightest and tiniest bikini drawings have been in the modern age. Her uniform has changed and modernized over time ... but like SM and BM there are iconic pieces that need to remain IMO. To me the skirt look is fine, but it almost always signifies times when Diana is truly arming herself for a BIG battle. It's an indication to the readers that she's preparing for either something ceremonial or an epic fight. I've never seen the issue with the bikini.

Avatar image for csg_cl
CSG_CL

3234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@csg_cl: What's misleading about that statement it's true isn't it?

To me her battle armour signifies that she is preparing for war.

I'm not expecting the battle skirt to be added just prefer could live whether she has it or not.

It's misleading because it implies that the skirt was in some way less sexualized than the bikini ... not true when taken into context of the times in which she wore the outfits. I prefer the battle skirt ONLY when she's prepping for war ... it's a nice visual cue for the reader that tells us "something major is happening"

Avatar image for csg_cl
CSG_CL

3234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@csg_cl: I don't see that as misleading its the truth her first appearance had her in a skirt. I doubt it had any sexual inferiority statement to it but I wouldn't be disinclined to believe it didn't.

The underwear was given to characters originally represent the fact that they were strong "men" to mimic the circus people who wore underwear on the outside.

Nope, her creator deliberately put her in a provocative outfit as WW ... for the exact opposite reasons than showing "sexual inferiority". The point was to show that a beautiful, sexual, independent woman was in fact more powerful than a dominate male. Her uniform evolved under later artists and writers into the bikini format ... Diana Prince was just as deliberately shown as mousy to showcase that a woman who held to current societal norms wasn't always the preference, Steve Trevor had little use for Diana, but was in love with WW. WW's characterization flew in the face of traditional female characters of the time who were always shown as either "good girl" or "femme fatale" with the latter always being villainous until WW popped onto the scene. There was also blatant sexual subtext and massive amounts of bondage imagery in the GA comic because the author believed submission to a loving authority was the source of female strength. Often times he would show bondage under men as a cruel punishment, and bondage under women as liberating.

Avatar image for csg_cl
CSG_CL

3234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@csg_cl: Isn't the "More powerful woman more powerful then the dominant man" a good thing. Symbolizing Woman empowerment.

Personally my original point is that it's her first appearance, and that I see a battle skirt more intune that she's a female warrior whose connected with Greek myths.

It is a good thing ... Moulton was a feminist through and through!

My point is that the skirt she wore in her first appearance is functionally far closer to the bikini than to a warrior's skirt. I'm not even 100% sure it was an actual skirt so much as culottes which basically got shorter and tighter as women's more risque fashions evolved over the next 20 years eventually becoming a bikini bottom.

Avatar image for csg_cl
CSG_CL

3234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@csg_cl: See what you mean I'm not saying the skirt and battle skirt is the same thing I'm just saying I'd see it fitting better as a modern day translation to the original suit.

I see what you are getting at ... I guess I just don't think the bikini needs to go. It's such an iconic look I'm not sure a non-fan would actually recognize an image of her as WW without it. I also think removing the bikini look vaguely implies that there is some shame in bare legs for a woman. Not saying that is what you are claiming in anyway!!

Avatar image for csg_cl
CSG_CL

3234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@csg_cl: Have no complaint about the look I think more of Greek and Myth when I think of Wonder Woman even though I know she has some of her own myth incorporated in her background and I have no interest to seeing a major change in WW like Amazonians running around with one boob or something just to be historically correct, just think its cool to use some modern day input same with my opinion on Superman suit should look more Alien, or Atlanteans should have a scaley skin texture.

I pretty indeifferent on WW's suit no major hate of it could care less, but I respect all yur points.

back at ya with the respect :)

Avatar image for captainmarvel4ever
CaptainMarvel4Ever

9999

Forum Posts

1337

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@undeadpool Wait, this article makes no sense, this was written after the New 52 launched and she got a new costume just like everyone else

Avatar image for saint_sophie
Saint_Sophie

7263

Forum Posts

1019

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Her current costumes not that bad. Though I prefer her with either the battle skirt or pants.

Avatar image for outside_85
Outside_85

23518

Forum Posts

18735

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 1

To answer the headline:

  • Because DC will get someone like David Finch to do the redesign, and it will be wretched
Avatar image for deactivated-5d3f071d30d9f
deactivated-5d3f071d30d9f

5172

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

I would loose the american flag motive and make it more Amazon Armor.

@nightfang:

There is evolution but you can say that in comics there equality to everyone.

Avatar image for arthurkerr
arthurkerr

2232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Who says that hero has to wear a suit all the time , can she not wear a dress or jeans or what ever in some of the story do they always have to stay in uniform or is there some uniform police keeping track of them?

Avatar image for theblondegod
TheBlondeGod

2845

Forum Posts

4868

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Costume talks again... lol

Avatar image for saint_sophie
Saint_Sophie

7263

Forum Posts

1019

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

And after about 3 years since this article was made, she got one.

Avatar image for makhai
makhai

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

The same reason why people raged over Superman losing his underpants. Change is impossible to accept until after it happens for comic book fans.