Comic Vine News

82 Comments

The Amazing Spider-Man 3: What We Want to See

The wall-crawler's latest movie is now on Blu-ray, so it's time to think about Parker's future on the big screen!

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is available on Blu-ray today and whether you loved it, thought it's okay or even loathed it, there's just no denying the script had some noticeable problems. We love the web-slinger and want nothing but the best for his cinematic future, so we're going to share some reasonable ideas on what they can do to get Spider-Man's new movie mythos back on track! Once you're done reading our suggestions, please be sure to chime in with what you want to see in Spidey's future on the big screen.

Don't let buildup and backstory overshadow the present

No Caption Provided

A common complaint about The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is it spent so much time worldbuilding and promoting its future movies (most notably Sinister Six) that it was unable to tell a compelling story of its own and abruptly brought in one of the character's most emotional moments. By the time The Amazing Spider-Man 3 comes out, Sinister Six and Venom/Carnage will have most likely been released. If Guardians of the Galaxy can do a thoroughly satisfying job making the world fall in love with five characters they've likely never heard of before, there's no good reason why those two films can't at least do a serviceable job develop the characters within their own movies and give them an organic role in the third Peter Parker movie. Once they find a way to make everyone matter or at least have a fair role and depth, the third film will hopefully tell its own engrossing story while also giving us little bits and pieces to tease what's next. A movie shouldn't feel like totally separate story arcs are randomly brought together in the end and unfortunately, that's how many people felt about this sequel.

We get it's important to establish the fact this is an evergrowing cinematic universe and we love a good Easter Egg, but it shouldn't overshadow the standalone story. That's exactly what happened here, unfortunately. Max Dillon's shift in personality was swift and Harry Osborn's villainous role felt very rushed. His big scene came off like "you beat the first boss, Spider-Man, and now here's the second one!" A character shouldn't feel like they're placed on the fast track just to make them ready for the next movie because that means we can't establish a proper connection to them.

As for the backstory, it's safe to say they've established the fact that Peter's dad is good and Oscorp is bad, right? Parker now has his base and his dad's research, Harry has a reason to hate Peter (and vice versa), and Parker has, for the most part, moved on from ASM 2's tragedy. Well, he'll never get over that, of course, but they made it clear that he's able to move forward. Part of what worked so well is Andrew Garfield's dynamic with Emma Stone, so now it's time to see if they can capture that magic with a potential new Mary Jane Watson.

Oh, and we can't hold this against the movie itself, but if you're going to have a villain in the story for less than 10 minutes, please don't slap the character on posters and tease them in trailers. Even though Marc Webb stated in interviews that Rhino has a minimal role, all of the promotions gave a totally different message.

More Aunt May

No Caption Provided

A big part of Peter Paker's story is the importance of family, so let's see more of that with the very talented Sally Field! They've spent plenty of time looking back, so now it's time to focus on the family Peter Parker has right now. The dynamic between the two has so much potential for laughs and a whole lot of heart. They've had fun with comedic beats between the two and we've seen May's financial struggle (which will hopefully lead to Parker having more scenes involving J. Jonah Jameson since he needs cash), but it would be great to see the focus shift back to Peter trying to hide who he is and doing his best to protect her. The "will she find out" element is one that'll have us wondering when -- if at all -- she discovers the truth and where it'll go from there. If so, they should strongly consider taking notes from AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #479. But before they do that, it would enhance the interaction if they have Peter catch uncle Ben's murderer and finally put that plot point to rest. Field's an Oscar-winning actress and her role has unlimited possibilities when it comes to bringing us more laughter and emotional moments, so they should really give her more time to shine.

Better interactions between Peter and Harry Osborn

No Caption Provided

Harry's transformation felt rushed and we get where they were going with that conflict, but the lack of elaboration between Norman Osborn's son and Peter really hurt the dynamic. When the two finally came face to face, it felt like the big moment wasn't really earned. Awesomely presented, yes, but the key scene seemed like it could have been held off a little longer. Still, it's understandable why it happened. The conflict between Spider-Man and Green Goblin wasn't all that interesting, but what happened with Gwen Stacy brings the conflict to a whole new level. We may have not seen it yet, but Peter has every reason in the world to loathe Harry and we understand why Harry wants to see him suffer. Now that a legitimate reason has been provided for these two to clash, their relationship should be loaded with intensity. They've clearly wanted to turn him into the big bad and now it's time to prove he's worthy of that title. We all know we'll see more of Harry in Sinister Six -- he is organizing the team, after all -- but assuming the character is still in action when ASM 3 comes around, they should be more than able to fill their rivalry with a ton of heated exchanges and give us the big Green Goblin and Spider-Man fight we've been waiting for.

More fun with Spider-Man

No Caption Provided

The movie's tone jumps around a wee bit, but overall, it seems like the new movie was aiming for more popcorn entertainment and something that feels like a classic Spider-Man comic brought to the big screen. Stuff like Paul Giamatti embracing the ridiculousness of his character was hysterical, but the scientist at Ravencroft was too over the top and jarring. However, one thing that lovers and haters of this movie seem to like the most (aside from the charming interactions between Peter and Gwen) is Spider-Man simply being Spider-Man. The early scene of him web-slinging throughout the city is a joy and using slow motion to show how he solves dilemmas (thanks to his trusty spider-sense) is good fun. Garfield does a great job bringing Spider-Man's personality to life and the action scenes -- be it Spidey stopping bullies, goons or big villains -- are a blast. So, it's safe to say we'd all love to see more of that, right?

What do you want to see in Spider-Man's cinematic future? Don't be shy, tell the world in the comments below!

82 Comments

Avatar image for bezza
Bezza

5019

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

..What do I want to see? Maybe one decent villain in the entire film, less crying and soap opera, more action and more gags please. Andrew Garfield carries off the cheeky one shot gag routine really well.

Avatar image for mufc
MUFC

489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

i want to see Venom and Goblin pounding Spiderman's ass to the ground.

Avatar image for vincent_valjean
Vincent_Valjean

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@dagmar_merrill: Hell no!!!Mysterio is the most boring villain ever!!How about Vermin,Morlun,Scorpion,Black Tarantula,Man-Wolf,Morbius?

Avatar image for amazing_webhead
amazing_webhead

10761

Forum Posts

1019

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 20

Edited By amazing_webhead

Norman Osborn back in all his magnificent bastardry!

Avatar image for bystander
Bystander

2406

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Bystander

@zaied said:

Continue developing Flash Thompson into Venom.

What that guy said. Really. We didn't see ANY Flash at all, the TASM 2

Avatar image for kuyamu
Kuyamu

81

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Kuyamu
Avatar image for baddog1994
baddog1994

23

Forum Posts

150

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I want them to get rid of shitty emo-pop music they have Peter listening to. It's clear Peter is a classic rock fan since his alarm was set to classic rock in ASM back when he was poor & sharing an apartment with some chick. The films should also show this.

Avatar image for thegrandsage23
TheGrandSage23

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@dimitridkatsis:

1) I don't see how being a nerd has to do with a persons looks

2) he was a total geek in the first film unless you're going to shower me with examples of Tobet being more of a nerd instead of him being a dude in glasses being picked on.. Totally different

On topic:

We don't need an overstuffed plot

Avatar image for kaine_17
kaine_17

165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

You people make me sick, it was a great movie, very dramatic, which what spider man us about, hero meets soap opera. You guys complain the building up to the others movies over shadowed this plot, any every thinks that thats just the plot. The movie can only be so long, i feel harry and max's change in character went at a good pace, and what was the goblin supposed to do, call peter saying "get ready, im going to take my revenge now" then swoop in. Would that be enough time between electro and goblin? And from what i read in ultimate spider man ( which is what the movie is mostly based on) rhino had a mechanical suit that ran hydraulics. Aaaaaaand the only reason sony should sell spidey back yo marvel so there can be cross overs and spider man (hopefully not actor new ) can join the avengers

Avatar image for shadowsnake89
Shadowsnake89

510

Forum Posts

2675

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

@i_dont_like_comics: Of course it was parodied before. Robot Chicken , Family Guy and about a thousand others, duh. I'm saying that Disney is saturating it with all the ones they are doing in one big heap. To top that off they don't look appealing in the slightest.Then there were the game cancellations with 1313 being one of LucasArts' more daring games getting scraped along with the Battlefront series. It seems to me that Disney doesn't really know how to handle the properties they buy they just get them so they can corner the market on kids entertainment.

Avatar image for i_dont_like_comics
i_dont_like_comics

776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

@shadowsnake89: oh, i'm sorry. it's not like star wars was parodied everywhere. wait they have been. as what they're doing with sw, they're bringing it back.

Avatar image for shadowsnake89
Shadowsnake89

510

Forum Posts

2675

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

@i_dont_like_comics: Disney owns Marvel which gives them leeway into what can and can't be in the films if they got the rights back from Sony. Just look at what they're doing with Starwars with the Disney crossovers, parodies and retcons. If Sony loses the rights I don't have much faith in what they'll do with it.

Avatar image for child_karl
Child_Karl

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I want them to perhaps just not make another spider man movie for like 15 years or so that'd be nice

Avatar image for hassun
Hassun

142

Forum Posts

62

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Hassun

I know Sony wants to keep making these for easy money and to retain the rights but I have not been impressed with their films so far at all.

It seems like they have been made completely by a marketing bureau, way more than the Marvel Studios films which seem to have some people behind them who actually care about comics, characters and stories.

This is insane to me as well because Disney, one of the masters of marketing crap is actually the boss of Marvel Studios.

I don't see these films getting any better unless there is a massive change of the people behind the scenes. Sinister Six or no Sinister Six.

Avatar image for the_impersonator
The Impersonator

10223

Forum Posts

23956

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 50

Edited By The Impersonator

I don't understand why people are still arguing about the Rhino appearance in ASM2. If you think about it, the Rhino armor is created from Oscorp similar as the other ones, the Goblin, the Octopus and the Vulture. Does anyone really expect that the Rhino should be given a flashy costume just like in the comics and the animated series? This is a movie, after all.

Avatar image for dimitridkatsis
dimitridkatsis

3019

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I don't get why people dig Garfield. Parker is a nerd not a pretty boy, sure he grows out of it but not in his origin story.

Avatar image for z3ro180
z3ro180

8778

Forum Posts

171

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I liked both movies but they both seemed rushed a lot of the time and very well thought out. Though one thing that is brillant about both film is Garfield as spiderman.

Avatar image for jwalser3
jwalser3

6131

Forum Posts

2559

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for i_dont_like_comics
i_dont_like_comics

776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

@jwalser3: oh sorry. didn't see you were talking about the quality of the movies. thought you were questioning who would make the movies.

Avatar image for jwalser3
jwalser3

6131

Forum Posts

2559

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

are you kidding me? marvel studios would make it, not disney. and everything made since disney acquired marvel was great. troll somewhere else.

Opinions.

Avatar image for copete
copete

2960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I want to see this series end in misery so Marvel can take him back!

Avatar image for novemberx2
Novemberx2

506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I just don't want to see the amazing spider man 3 at all!

the first two are bad. They belong in bargin bin with Fantastic Four, Batman & Robin and Iron man 3

Avatar image for rubear
Rubear

4819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

No more bloody tears. This what i want to see.

Avatar image for i_dont_like_comics
i_dont_like_comics

776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

@madeinbangladesh said:

I don't want to see ASM 3 because ASM 2 SUCKED!!!!!!!

Sony, give Spidey back to MARVEL!!!

So Disney can get their greasy mits on it? They've already shown they can't make a decent cartoon.

But I definitely want Mysterio. Would be funny if thy got Michael Bay, the king of special effects to play him or at least an assistant in a scene. Also maybe Shocker. He's been in most of the Spider-man games.

are you kidding me? marvel studios would make it, not disney. and everything made since disney acquired marvel was great. troll somewhere else.

Avatar image for captainmarvel4ever
CaptainMarvel4Ever

9999

Forum Posts

1337

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

To be perfectly honest, this is what I want to see:

No Caption Provided

Avatar image for shadowsnake89
Shadowsnake89

510

Forum Posts

2675

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

I don't want to see ASM 3 because ASM 2 SUCKED!!!!!!!

Sony, give Spidey back to MARVEL!!!

So Disney can get their greasy mits on it? They've already shown they can't make a decent cartoon.

But I definitely want Mysterio. Would be funny if thy got Michael Bay, the king of special effects to play him or at least an assistant in a scene. Also maybe Shocker. He's been in most of the Spider-man games.

Avatar image for ravenvice01
RavenVice01

5528

Forum Posts

90401

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 86

We may have to wait and see what is left for Spidey to contend with after the Sinister Six, the Venom spin off and Spider-Woman spin off. I suppose the Spider-Woman spin off can be loosely based on the Clone Saga since Miles Warren aka the Jackal did have a hand in the creation of Spider-Woman.

Avatar image for leokearon
leokearon

1970

Forum Posts

5595

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 2

Emma Stone to return, which is very easy to do.

Avatar image for rustyroy
RustyRoy

16610

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By RustyRoy

No more Richard Parker.

Avatar image for dreamfall31
dreamfall31

611

Forum Posts

13

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

If they have multiple villains, they need more of them working together against Spidey. The few moments Electro and Harry teamed up was awesome, but it literally was like 3 minutes.

Also a focus on less plots would make it a better movie. ASM2 had to deal with...

- Peter and Gwen's relationship (which itself includes the on-again off-again parts, Gwen leaving for London, Peter deciding to stay with her wherever she goes)

- Electro's origin

- Goblin's origin

- Peter searching for answers about his parents

- Peter and Aunt May coming to terms with Uncle Ben's death

- Harry and Peter reconnecting

- Harry looking to cure himself

- Aftermath of Gwen's death

- Pointless Rhino introduction

Way too much was going on. If ASM2 focused on Peter and Gwen's relationship, Peter and Harry Reconnecting (laying foundation for Goblin for the 3rd movie), and this all intertwined with a worthwhile foe. Electro was just such a waste and had ZERO impact on the plot. It was just a guy that Spidey had to take care of. I can understand a plot like that in a comic, but this is a big budget entry in a movie series, he should have been much more than just a throwaway villain. Also Jamie Foxx was supremely miscast.

Avatar image for superior_prime_maybe
superior_prime_maybe

1360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@devinwifi: There is nothing wrong with the director. The original movie was quite simple and good. And had nothing that everyone is complaining about. It was the producers that wanted to tweek around and push around the story. That is why marc webb wont be doing the next one. (or at least he said he has no interest in that).
The movie was originally,

  1. not going to have norman die.
  2. build up on the osborns.
  3. not have gwen die. (that was to happen in next)
  4. introduce Mary jane.
  5. Rhino was to be the second important villain after electro. Goblin was to come in the next one.
  6. OsCorp was spying on peter.
Avatar image for moogman13
IDontLikeBirds

873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'd prefer there to just not be anymore Spider-man movies. I like the character, but as others have said, there is over saturation, and I'm getting fatigue from all his movies. It feels like the same stuff again and again, plus I'll continually be comparing the Spider-man movies to each other, which is reasonable as they are not that old. It's not like comparing Nolan's Batman movies to the others, where there was quite a bit of time between them (enough time that some people, teens, didn't know there were other Batman movies). Also, I would prefer they stop having Spider-man do all his movies at night. It feels weird thinking of Spider-man as this hero who fights mainly at night now like he's Batman, gives a darker feel. I like that he jokes around more as he should, but he should be doing things during the day as well and actually be the friendly neighborhood Spider-man. I couldn't keep my attention with ASM2, and kept losing interest. There were parts here and there that I liked (especially the end with The Rhino), but more of it that I zoned out during. Harry felt forced and so did Electro's shift in character. If the rights did go back to Marvel sometime soon somehow, I don't think I'd want to see the movie, just because it feels like its been done so much.

Avatar image for shikatema88
shikatema88

13

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I see a lot of go back to Marvel, which could be cool but that would almost certainly be our 3rd Spidey origin story that gets old.

Avatar image for scouts1998
scouts1998

646

Forum Posts

31739

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 2

Spider-man 4 with Raimi and Maguire back and to see their vulture

Avatar image for cobramorph
COBRAMORPH

1884

Forum Posts

650

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I want Gwen to come back to life as a Pink Goblin. Marvel should fire Scarlett Johanson, kill off her BW, & put Gwen & Pepper in costumes, they are the only two female characters Marvel has that are not horrible. I kinda liked Agent13 from Cap2, but she was over shadowed by that awful Widow.

What I do NOT want is that piece of shit Rhino.

Avatar image for allstarsuperman
AllStarSuperman

51220

Forum Posts

148

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Avatar image for teerack
Teerack

10703

Forum Posts

1614

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 64

Considering they already have ASM 4 confirmed I don't think the sinister six will be in 3.

Avatar image for granitesoldier
GraniteSoldier

12746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

@k4tzm4n: They do seem to really want MJ, which isn't exactly a shame but like I said will lessen Gwen's death to the casual Spidey-viewer. Hell, it could even make Peter look bad like he just goes from one girl to the next without much else thought. I heard she was cut from the last film as well, so hopefully they introduce her and establish her as an important part of Peter's future, but don't dive into their relationship right away.

Thank you for the praise as well. As a life-long Spidey fan I'm desperate for that "perfect" Spider-film haha.

Avatar image for k4tzm4n
k4tzm4n

41857

Forum Posts

9127

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

Edited By k4tzm4n  Moderator

@granitesoldier: Great post and I agree with all of your points. There's so much room with the Sinister Six, and even if they get their own movie first -- which is the currrent plan -- there's still plenty of story and character potential with them. However, I feel like they really want to include MJ (seems like she was cut to make this one less cluttered and they'd just find a way to work her in down the road).

@vegandiet said:

I wanna see Spider-man lifting the collapsed machinery off his back ala ASM #33.

We saw his greatest failure last film. I'd like to see his greatest triumph in this one.

Would love to see this!

Avatar image for juke
Juke

855

Forum Posts

66

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

This movie is on the verge of not happening, actually. Amazing Spider-Man 2 didn't do too well and Sony is getting jittery. I've heard they're going to can it and try to jump to a Sinister Six film instead.

Avatar image for norrinboltagonprime21
NorrinBoltagonPrime21

6868

Forum Posts

782

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Avatar image for devbob98
Devbob98

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for phalcon05
Phalcon05

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Phalcon05

The rights to to MCU and do a spiderman origin that shows a high school kid in New York City who gets superpowers after the battle of New York around Norman Osborne as his big bad and introduces the symbiote. Norman and Peter cross over with the avengers. Agent Venom crosses over with GOTG. MCU post shield fall is tailor made for Norman Osborne's character

Avatar image for thejester
TheJester

211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By TheJester

I just want Mysterio.

Avatar image for t_aesir
T_Aesir

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By T_Aesir

@dimitridkatsis: You are totally right, but Hollywood is a business and if the start losing money in movies, you will see if they don t sell the rights back to marvel or other studio (if that s even possible)...

Remember that TASM2 cost around $330,000,000 to make, (with the publicity), and from the $708,294,944 that the movie made worldwide 1/3 goes to theaters so the movie barely made money for the studio.

The critical response wasn t good to TASM2, and their next movie is something that no one did before a villains movie, i could be wrong but i see Sony lose money in 2016 Sinister Six.

Avatar image for themantisshrimp
TheMantisShrimp

453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Please no death in this one. I get that Peter often has bad luck but I didn't see the need to kill Captain Stacy and Gwen in the first two. Let the next one end on a happy note, I enjoy both Amazing Spider-Man movies but don't like how either ended.

Avatar image for dimitridkatsis
dimitridkatsis

3019

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@t_aesir first of all thank you for the time you took to provide all that information that make me even more optimistic than before, I just think there's the contract problem which says Sony gets to keep the movie rights for the character if it makes a film every __ (insert number of years) but if it's more danaging than profiting maybe they'll drop it and we'll get to see him interact with other superheroes of marvel.

Avatar image for deathpoolthet1000
DeathpooltheT1000

18984

Forum Posts

11

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Go into Marvel Studios Faile so hard it destroy Marvel Cinematic universe and it cost Joe Quesada job.

  • 82 results
  • 1
  • 2