Comic Vine News

62 Comments

Off My Mind: Should Superheroes Ever Quit?

Fighting evil is a never-ending battle but how long can heroes keep it up?

Heroes by nature, give it their all. They are driven by their unselfish desire to do their best. Their number one goal is to make the world a better place and to make it safe for the innocent. Heroes spend their time training to meet take on incredible obstacles and always manage to beat the odds.

No Caption Provided

Because fighting evil is a never-ending battle, how long can they truly keep it up? As heroes, are they expected to constantly continue to fight every single day, knowing their job will never come to an end? They are not in it for the fame or glory but how long can they keep taking the punches to try to do what they believe in?

== TEASER ==

Again, by the nature and essence of a superhero, there is no giving up. They strongly and absolutely believe in what they are doing. As good as they may be, they may often find themselves alone in the fight. There may be new heroes popping up each day but for every new hero or problem, a half dozen new ones show up as well.

No Caption Provided

Heroes rarely get a moment's rest. They can't afford the luxury of going on vacation. Some might say they are obsessive compulsive but they know a lot is riding on what they do. Sure they aren't the only ones capable of doing the job but there never seems to be enough help when it comes down to it. When they're good at what they do and when they truly believe in it, it's hard for them to hold back. Regardless what a hero might be doing in their spare time, if the call goes out, if they are needed, they will drop what they are doing in order to be a hero.

But what happens to their personal life? Many superheroes have had to constantly make sacrifices. They've lost family and loved ones in the process. That might serve to make them work harder as a hero. If they fail at personal relationships or civilian jobs, they may adopt the view that being a superhero is the only thing they're really good at. That is great for the countless innocent civilians that often fall prey to the villains and people get a kick out of seeing their heroes in action, but being on duty all the time isn't healthy. What happens if the hero gets frustrated or tired of all the hassles and responsibilities while they don't necessarily get any thanks?

No Caption Provided

Heroes shouldn't have to do it all by themselves. There should be others that could fight by their side or take over to allow them to take a vacation to a tropical island. That just never really seems to happen. Something always pulls the hero back in. If some tragedy should occur while the hero was away, the blame would fall on their shoulder.

If heroes don't ever get time away, they become disillusioned. They may lose the desire to continue what they do. The essence of a hero says they can never call it quits. But there may come a time when enough is enough. Should that ever happen, hopefully there will be someone around to take their place. Otherwise that would mean the villains win.

(Note: I intentionally left out the typical "___ No More" images. You're welcome.)

62 Comments

Avatar image for bluelantern1995
BlueLantern1995

3237

Forum Posts

7086

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 26

Edited By BlueLantern1995

Depending on the scenario. The hero must feel right about retiring. Things like Old age, paralyzation, amputation, personal loss( the ones with critical damage like loss of a spouse), loosing powers/gadgets/tech, no more secret identity or other such similar thing. One other is if... well let's use Batman as a example. He retires due to old age in Batman Beyond. He then gives mantle to Terry. I think that is one other way to do it... retiring and giving mantle.

Avatar image for jonesdeini
JonesDeini

3874

Forum Posts

224

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 212

User Lists: 9

Edited By JonesDeini

Sure they can, part of being a hero is knowing how/when to walk away. If you don't you end up like well...The Red Thunder in Animal Man, Frank Castle, or every crazy/lonely interpretation of future Batman.

Avatar image for jonesdeini
JonesDeini

3874

Forum Posts

224

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 212

User Lists: 9

Edited By JonesDeini

@cbishop said:

In a world where characters don't age, there's no reason for them to quit. In a world with continuity that includes aging, generational characters, then they should absolutely quit at some point. They'd have to. This would naturally be bittersweet for readers, to see their favorite character(s) come to the end of their run, but I think a story with an ending is always better than the never-ending soap opera.

Well said, but yeah...profit margin dictates that most heroes will never quit. DC's built on legacy characters, well it was before the latest reboot at least. But their most recognizable characters will NEVER be allowed to age beyond a certain point so they'll never have to face that natural retirement/passing on of the legacy aspect. They'v always tried to have it both ways with some characters aging/retiring/marrying and some staying static and it really doesn't work trying to do it both ways. Marvel's guilty of that too. Franklin Richards is a PERFECT example. The Power kids he used to adventure with have truly aged, I mean Alex is 19 in Hickman's run, but Franklin's at most 10?

Avatar image for darthshap
DarthShap

880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By DarthShap

@BlueLantern1995 said:

Depending on the scenario. The hero must feel right about retiring. Things like Old age, paralyzation, amputation, personal loss( the ones with critical damage like loss of a spouse), loosing powers/gadgets/tech, no more secret identity or other such similar thing. One other is if... well let's use Batman as a example. He retires due to old age in Batman Beyond. He then gives mantle to Terry. I think that is one other way to do it... retiring and giving mantle.

Not really due to old age, due to the trauma of having to defend himself with a gun.

Avatar image for cbishop
cbishop

21178

Forum Posts

393973

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 1268

Edited By cbishop

@JonesDeini said:

Well said, but yeah...profit margin dictates that most heroes will never quit. DC's built on legacy characters, well it was before the latest reboot at least. But their most recognizable characters will NEVER be allowed to age beyond a certain point so they'll never have to face that natural retirement/passing on of the legacy aspect. They'v always tried to have it both ways with some characters aging/retiring/marrying and some staying static and it really doesn't work trying to do it both ways. Marvel's guilty of that too. Franklin Richards is a PERFECT example. The Power kids he used to adventure with have truly aged, I mean Alex is 19 in Hickman's run, but Franklin's at most 10?

Superman has been written in the past as potentially being immortal, and the Generations Elseworlds floated the idea of Batman using Lazarus Pits to stay around. All of that's okay, but I like the idea of generational characters better. DC keeps rebooting, to keep their characters current, but keeps trying to give them the same backstories. They've missed numerous oportunities to rework some characters, and tie their histories together, upping sales potential for characters like the Marvel Family, Firestorm, Blue Beetle (Ted Kord) and Starman. Those are different rants though.

With Marvel... I have to admit, I am way out of the loop with them. Overall though, they've laid the foundations for generational characters, but don't really want to let the previous generations of characters go.

I'm sorry, when you write a Death of Suerpman, or Death of Spider-Man, Batman RIP, or promote the sidekick to the mantle of the hero, you don't do that as a gimmick, and then undo it. Those should be final, they should be epic, and the world should talk about those stories forever. But they should move on, with new stories about the next generation of characters.

Avatar image for sylentecho
SylentEcho

78

Forum Posts

445

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 7

Edited By SylentEcho

Superheroes never quit. Once you save people, you just have to carry on doing so even if you're overshadowed by someone else in the same city. Just look at Guardian for instance.

Avatar image for jhazzroucher
jhazzroucher

25150

Forum Posts

395

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Edited By jhazzroucher

I don't want Ororo Munroe to quit being a superhero

Avatar image for mewarmo990
mewarmo990

10

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By mewarmo990

Yes. It would be more strange if they didn't.

The fact that they don't quit is more likely driven by marketing than any perpetual desire to bring justice to the world.

As a business, you want to stick with familiar characters (brands) because that's what audiences want. But realistically, it doesn't make a lot of sense unless the character has some psychological motivation that drives him/her to keep fighting no matter what.

Avatar image for tragicmagic
Tragicmagic

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Tragicmagic

I actually believe superheroes should retire if age and physical health harm their performance as a superhero

Let me refer to Batman Beyond for this reference. In the show, Bruce was old, his heart was failing him, and he had to resort to using a handgun to fight off common thugs. That lead to Bruce looking for a new apprentice to become the new Batman.

Its reasons like that which should superheroes should retire after a certain point in their lives, especially if they have apprentices and proteges already or if they have the means to have some

Avatar image for time_phantom
Time_Phantom

834

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Time_Phantom

Is it me or does that last scan of super man look like the cover of a certain spider-man issue that gets redone often?

Avatar image for deactivated-5d1828448d5f0
deactivated-5d1828448d5f0

6064

Forum Posts

398

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 21

@Danial79 said:

I think it's their right to quit, but how guilty would Batman feel if he quit and then heard that the Joker had committed some heinous crime.

this.

Avatar image for enigma_2099
enigma_2099

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By enigma_2099

Depends...

... is there a point to them wanting to quit? Are they pushed to that decision? Are they needed anymore? Is it more than a f******* plot point?

Answer my questions, and I'll take a crack at yours...

  • 62 results
  • 1
  • 2