Comic Vine News

108 Comments

Off My Mind: Batman Zero Year and the Red Hood Gang Leader

Is he supposed to be who we think he is?

Batman: Zero Year is underway and we're discovering what happened when Bruce Wayne returned to Gotham City after spending years away, training to become the skilled fighter/detective we know today. As we witness the birth of the legend that will become Batman, Gotham is being terrorized by the Red Hood Gang.

No Caption Provided

The Red Hood Gang has existed, to some extent, in previous comics. With more of a focus on the gang, their activity and the mysterious leader, we can't help but wonder about his identity and if he's supposed to be who we think he is?

No Caption Provided

There may be some minor spoilers below but only if you haven't been reading Zero Year for some reason.

Originally, it was the Joker who was the leader of the Red Hood Gang. Wearing a giant pill-shaped helmet and a cape, in his final robbery at the Ace Chemical Plant, the leader fell into a vat of chemicals which resulted in the birth of the Joker.

In Alan Moore's THE KILLING JOKE, we saw the man who would become the Joker was not quite the cruel and calculating man the Joker is today. Getting involved with the gang, this man was told they all took turns being the "leader" and wearing the costume to throw off the authorities should they get caught. Basically, he was a patsy.

Then his encounter with Batman and the GCPD resulted in him falling in the chemicals once again. Of course the flashback/memories of the man Joker used to be could have been false according to Joker as his memory sometimes gets muddled.

No Caption Provided

In Zero Year, the leader is just that, he is the absolute man in charge. Based on history, it seems we're supposed to assume he will become Joker. He just doesn't quite feel like he could be the same man.

Granted, we're talking the New 52. Things can change. As much as THE KILLING JOKE is praised, the idea of Joker previously being a nebbish…loser just felt wrong. Of course it could be the chemicals that twisted his mind and transformed him into the Joker. But that goes into the questioning of what is Joker's motivation and why. That's a completely other topic. Whether or not it was purely the chemicals that caused Joker to be as cruel as he is seems too easy.

No Caption Provided

That being said, perhaps there is something to the idea of Joker being the guy in control that we've been seeing. If that was the case, it leads to some other implications. The leader of the gang has mentioned recalling when Bruce's parents were killed. How much older than Bruce would he be? Has anyone ever really thought about the possible age difference between Batman and Joker? Was Joker always a resident in Gotham? Even with white skin, wouldn't there be someone that would recognize his facial features?

There's also the fact that the gang itself exists. Joker may have some henchmen from time to time but he rarely keeps so many around. The leader told Bruce he formed the gang because people were afraid of random violence like the death of Thomas and Martha Wayne.

"…at the end of the day, what people are afraid of is the nothing of it, Bruce. The randomness. The empty center. Stare into it and try to find meaning, you'll go mad. All you can do is fear, and survive."

No Caption Provided

Joker's never been one to have an actual plan or motivation for his actions to this extent. He doesn't normally give speeches quite like this, even though he did have quite a bit to say in THE KILLING JOKE. Would he have the initiative to form a gang in order to terrorize the citizens of Gotham? And for what reason? The leader has been pretty organized and structured, something Joker isn't exactly known for. Joker is more about the quick and big results. He wouldn't work with someone like Philip Kane just to get his hands on some Wayne Enterprises tech.

Another thing to note is when Bruce had an encounter with him in the blimp and was almost unmasked himself, he did manage to get a DNA sample of the leader.

No Caption Provided

We would imagine Batman's managed to get a sample from the Joker during their fights over the years. Even if there wasn't any records to who the DNA belonged to, he would be able to match the DNA of the Red Hood Gang Leader to Joker's.

Is Joker the leader of the Red Hood Gang? History suggests we should believe this is the case. Scott Snyder has earned our trust when it comes to Batman and the other characters. This question just has us guessing. We're used to expecting the unexpected, especially with some of the liberties creators have been allowed in the New 52. Snyder seems more rooted with tradition in regards to the characters. Something just feels a little off. Could it just be a matter of the inevitable chemical bath that changes the Red Hood Gang Leader's personality and M.O.?

There's still plenty more left to Zero Year. We shouldn't try to predict what Snyder will throw at us but something smells a little fishy with the leader.

No Caption Provided

108 Comments

Avatar image for wishiwassuperman
WIshIWasSuperman

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@ghinzdra: the thing is though, you dammed Snyder from the beginning with Zero Year.

I'm assuming you've read the final issue, I which case I wonder where you stand (I can't spoiler block anything, I'm on my phone) since he kind of didn't do either option you provided, and also did, depending on how you read it.

The fact is under N52, stories are being retold and the Red Hood gang was part of that. He was tasked with it and personally I think he did a damn fine job re-imagining that story and the characters involved. It's unfair to say he's bad if he does option 1 and worse if he dies option 2, especially when the options pretty much cover every possible outcome. It becomes a self supporting argument, relying solely on people agreeing with your personal opinion, but you present it in a way which seems matter of fact and then use this to damn the author in question.

Here's the thing, I don't like everything every writer does either. I don't even like everything Snyder has done with the character (such as Death of the Family) BUT I couldn't do better and I certainly aren't good enough to get paid money to do it.

Your real gripe if anything is that you thought Killing joke was perfect and didn't want that re told. Well, too bad, it's a new universe and a lot of the stories are being re told. If you don't like it, don't buy it. But don't criticise Snyder (or any author) in a no-win situation based purely on your opinion. You've panned him in almost every regard, even criticising the fact that he hasn't changed the characters - forgetting that if he did, every Batgod fanboy would want his head. Personally I think he's done a great job so far in a limited amount if time with particular stories and representations of characters I enjoy.

//rant

Avatar image for weenman1
weenman1

160

Forum Posts

640

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Edited By weenman1

@dud317: http://www.ssynth.co.uk/~gay/anagram.html I found nothing

Avatar image for bransonhuggins
BransonHuggins

101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By BransonHuggins

It's Hurt. The Hole in the things, the empty center, the emptiness. No, I kid, this isn't Morrison, though that would totally fit that quote the Leader of the Red Hood(s) gives. Is it the Joker, probably not honestly. But I don't know who it could be. I think the Joker would be to obvious, and Snyder already did a big Joker story with Death of the Family, this would be a bit to soon in my opinion to go back and do another Joker story, even if it was an origin of sorts.

Avatar image for glfmntn
glfmntn

11

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I am pretty sure the Red Hood leader is The Joker based on the visual clues. In issue 17 there is a picture of The Joker with no make-up, and if you compare that with the images of RH leader when he takes his helmet it off you see the same green eyes and big nose along with the scene in issue 13 at ACE chemical dressed as the RH. Also some people complaining about him now having an origin story, I don't quite get. If RH is now The Joker, all we know is that he fell into some chemicals, but we still no zero about who that man was or why he truly became the RH other than some possible BS he told Bruce. I am really enjoying Zero Year, and I hope that during this story he can craft an iconic story for The Riddler.

Avatar image for sigersonltd
SigersonLTD

154

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

As we know, Joker has 'multiple' origins. It follows that RH may actually be The Joker, or one of the RH's is he in waiting.

If this doesn't make sense, I'll explain further, however, I'm thinking this is going to be what's going on when all will be revealed.

Avatar image for ghinzdra
ghinzdra

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ghinzdra

@wishiwassuperman:

He set himself up for failure. As for the rh leader, Yes it s a no win situation but only because he choosed to sell the rh leader so strongly as the joker before. He either follow the most famous joker origin very closely (not original) or he betrays the story he strongly setup (because the organic conclusion to his setup can only be for the rh leader to be the joker. If he goes against with a weird ass twist it will be like the debacle xorn magneto debacle in x man all over again. Xorn had to be magneto and marvel prefered to screw morrison story)

Just one exemple - He could have chosen to setup the rh leader a brilliant and somehow anarchic gangster - Reminding us the joker . The leader would have a young small fry clearly identified as a distinct character that admires him and copy him, a teenager whose origins are unclear but clearly without the advantage of bruce, this young guy see through his bs and realize je's another mayerialistic gamgster. Then the young batman too reckless at this point and bent on catching the leader, make a mistake that jokerize the small fry and isn't even aware of this mistake and of the very existence of the guy. Now this joker is a complete fabrication - part ersatz of a powerful faker , part nothing to lose- lost in this world guy, part mistake of batman. It makes him pathetic and Dangerous at the same time. that's just one exemple. But the point is there were plenty of fresh way to introduce the joker. There even wasn't a need to reuse the rh Snyder just rehashed with half asses answers.

As for the end of the batgod, it took place well before him. Same thing here : plenty of fresh way to question the character - for exemple with all the city stuff those last year - I d like a writer to explore how batman is clearly a patriarch idea - how batman is exactly the kind of thing you would expect from the heir to one of the 5 great family of Gotham (BTW Another great family kane is also a vigilante - and another is a villain - olgivy) - how he behaves as a lord of the city, with few respect for the law except his, and how he might be actually fighting for an ideal Gotham but a Gotham ideal for a patriarch. And the jerkass attitude, the always condescending behavior makes all the more sense in such a mindset.

Snyder doesn't bring anything new. He does fancy with his heavy symbolism, he does smart with his intricate plots but he doesn't do challenging. He's a very good story of the week writer but he's not a great batman writer.

Avatar image for wishiwassuperman
WIshIWasSuperman

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By WIshIWasSuperman

@ghinzdra: Agree to disagree I guess. The thing is, Zero Year is NOT a Joker origin story - it's a Batman origin story first. Is the Red Hood the Joker? Based on Death of the Family I'd say yes he is supposed to be - but I personally have no problem with this. I don't see why the Joker wouldn't be originally a cold and calculating, somewhat mastermind criminal - in fact that's exactly what he should be to me. For me it makes no sense to have him as someone who is weak and feeble and basically has no history as a criminal even to link him to becoming the Joker. Zero Year pays more homage to the original Red Hood/Joker origin - Killing Joke was a re-imagining itself and still had a dodgy ending with the " Sometimes I remember it one way, sometimes another..." business. Is it a good story? Sure, but it's not a definitive origin story (IMO) and I personally don't see why its heralded as such, considering the cop out ending which means the entire thing is not worth squat as a history for the character. It works perfectly for the Joker, and there's easily more to it that may be revealed later. Have you listened to example the Fatman on Batman podcast with Snyder and Capullo? If not, check it out as you might find it changes some of your ideas and perspectives.

Avatar image for ghinzdra
ghinzdra

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ghinzdra

@wishiwassuperman: you seem pretty hung up on killing joke. I think it s a great story but completely ok with changing it. What really bugs me with zero year is precisely how he desperately classic he stayed. He should have ignored the rh stuff altogether. I think he s aware of how classic his story ultimately is hence this epilogue with alternate scenarios (some of them barely make sense) : the way it's presented it s a cop out.

"I know my story isn't really mind boggling so let's make s... Up and create a fake mystery , let's pretend that it a lot deeper than what it actually is." That s weak storytelling

Snyder has been guilty of weak storytelling a lot lately in various forms : dotf was almost an insult to our intelligence in how it tried ver hard to LOOK deep and edgy but had nothing to backup this claim