Comic Vine News

312 Comments

Interview: James Robinson Reveals DC's Latest LGBT Character

SPOILER ALERT: The writer discusses the decision to make the leader of the EARTH 2 Justice Society an LGBT character and why that doesn't really matter.

Some writers, like James Robinson, are familiar with writing LGBT characters. Perhaps this is why the decision to re-introduce one of DC's oldest characters as an LGBT character in the New 52 came so easily for the man who wrote the first kiss shared between two gay characters in a comic book. We had the chance to catch up with James and talk to him about the decision, ask him why it was (and wasn't) an important decision, and what readers can expect out of his EARTH 2 series.

No Caption Provided

We also get a look at two pages from EARTH 2 #2, the upcoming issue of his ongoing DC title. Finally, due to the time constraint we were unable to ask all the questions we wanted to ask. We also know there are a lot of questions many of you might have about the decision and the series overall which is why we have invited James to join us for next Friday's podcast (Friday, June 8th 2012). Please submit your questions and comments for James to podcast@comicvine.com. If you don't mind the spoiler before the release of EARTH 2 issue #2, check out the full interview below.

== TEASER ==
*click to enlarge*
*click to enlarge*

Comic Vine: Why Alan Scott? Was this your choice? Was it an Editorial decision and how and when did the decision come about?

James Robinson: It came about 8 months ago when I was first putting the team together. One of the things that bothered me about the reboot and about the Justice Society being young again was that there were some characters that would no longer exist. One of those characters is Obsidian, Alan Scott's gay son. So from then on I started to think about it and it seemed like a logical leap to make Alan Scott gay. And the idea that the leader of the Justice Society, the most honorable, dynamic and gallant hero on Earth 2 would be a gay man just seemed like a really cool and interesting direction for the character.

So it was my idea, but to be fair Dan DiDio, when he heard about the idea, there wasn't a moment of hesitation on his part. He thought it was a great idea

CV: My next question is actually about Obsidian and Jade. Pre-New 52 Alan Scott had had a romantic relationship with Rose Canton and the two characters had twin babies, Obsidian and Jade. Now that Scott has been reintroduced into the DC Universe as a gay character, does that mean neither of these characters (Obsidian and Jade) ever existed? Does that mean Scott and Rose never had a relationship?

JR: Remember, this is a reboot. Not a relaunch. There are sweeping changes that were made in the DC Universe and one of those is that Jade and Obsidian couldn't exist because Alan Scott is just too young -- he's about 27 years old now. So, they couldn't exist in that way but because they were popular characters I have been thinking of a way that they could exist that I might try and implement in the future, but that won't be for a while yet.

CV: As a writer, is it important to make Alan Scott a gay character or is this sort of a "non issue"? How do you see it?

JR: Well, it's not like "ooh, we've got a gay character" -- that's sort of been manufactured by fans, really. I think anyway. We've had this idea running for months and months and I didn't think it was a big deal, honestly. I really didn't think it was a big deal. I mean you should have them. Just like there are LGBT people in all aspects of society, it makes sense that there would be gay characters in comic books as well. And when Dan DiDio made that announcement he wasn't being cryptic, he was just making an off-handed comment. He feels the same way honestly. It's just the reality of life and it's not a big deal. I guess it is to some people and as a result there's been this wave of interest in the subject on the internet and in the media.

No Caption Provided

CV: Alan Scott is a Golden Age character, which means he has a lot of history. Did you worry about any negative reactions from long time fans of the character? Is this something you are anticipating? Or has the feedback so far been mainly positive?

JR: Well it's been mixed. Most people have been very positive and of course there are some people that have…I mean, yes he appeared in a few pages of EARTH 2 #1, but they haven't really gotten to know the character yet. I think there is a rush to pre judge from audiences online, but something I want to stress is that what I want to do with all the EARTH 2 characters is not…I'm not trying to change them in any radical way. In fact I think I am being very faithful to the characters and their origins from the 1940's. These characters have aged…the continuity for Alan Scott, for example, if you follow it is very strange and convoluted. He was an engineer, then a news reader, then he owned the radio station, then he lost his job and became a scientist, then he somehow got back his radio station…So, there's a lot of stuff that's been lead on the character and all I am doing is stripping a lot of that away [getting back to his roots]. What was he back in the day? He was this young, gallant, dynamic take-charge, type A personality, very brave and very caring -- he wanted to protect the world. He was the big powerhouse of the Golden Age characters, in a way. All of that hasn't changed. All that's changed is that the media that he is the master of is the internet media. He's just moving with the times. And in a way he's just moving with the times again. In every way he's the same dynamic, likable Alan Scott that he was before -- all I've really changed is his sexuality; which to me is just one factor of him and it isn't that big of a deal in the first place.

CV: Romantic relationships, will we be seeing any?

JR: At first I'm setting up the team and dealing with threats to the world and everything, but there will be breather moments where we do see what people get up to outside of being a superhero. So yes, you will see romantic relationships.

CV: Are you excited?

JR: I've grown more excited as people have grown excited and interested in it. I was more concerned with other aspects of EARTH 2, Alan Scott's sexuality was just a small part of it but the fact that people have responded so mostly favorably, I am very happy that this have been given the reception that it has been given.

No Caption Provided

CV: Now, this isn't the first time you've written a gay character in comics, you've actually written a gay character in the past, right?

JR: I actually believe I wrote the first gay kiss -- male gay kiss -- in a comic book back in STARMAN #45. So, I've been doing this sort of thing for a while and it isn't that I have any kind of agenda or anything, it's just that when it suits the story and when it makes sense for that character it's just a realistic depiction of present day society.

CV: In your eyes do you feel it's important to have the leader of the EARTH 2 Justice Society be a gay male?

JR: Well, is it important? Not necessarily. But I think it's cool and it makes a change. I mean one of the things that can happen with gay characters is that when they are on a team they sometimes get pushed aside and their whole identity is wrapped up in this "oh that's the gay character." But when you meet Alan Scott you will find that there are so many [other things that define who he is] different aspects to his life, who he is as a person. I mean, I live in San Francisco, I have plenty of gay friends and their sexuality is just a part of who they are. Obviously there's a whole lot more to all of them and Alan Scott is the same way. By making him the team leader there really is no way that I can't show that aspect of a gay person through him being so at the forefront of the team, and that has to be a good thing. This character is going to be very likable, very brave and he will be someone that a lot of people like. I mean, if there are teenage kids and they like Alan Scott and he is kid is going though his or her own feelings about being LGBT…if it helps him or her in any little way, or if a kid reads Alan Scott and he really likes the character and that makes him think twice about bullying a kid, you know, that's a fantastic plus to the character being the leader of the team.

CV: What can we expect in issue #2 of EARTH 2?

JR: The book -- based on the cover -- is sort of apparent. It really focuses a lot on the origin of Jay Garrick and how he becomes the Flash and his origin as the Flash and why he becomes the Flash. What you will also see is the first appearance of Mr. Terrific from his own comic, and you will meet a major villain in the EARTH 2 universe that Mr. Terrific will encounter. That will be a huge part of the second arc. You will also see more of Alan Scott, who he is and what kind of a person he is and some of his origin will be played out in issue #2 and that will be picked up in issue #3 and by issue #3 he will be the Green Lantern.

Issue #2 of EARTH 2 hits stores on June 6th, 2012. We were lucky enough to have the chance to ask James all these questions about EARTH 2, Alan Scott and what we can anticipate in his ongoing series -- but we also want to give you a chance to ask James questions as well. Mr. Robinson will be joining us on our podcast next Friday, June 8th 2012 to discuss the release of issue #2 and anything else you want to talk to him about. Email your questions and comments to podcast@comicvine.com. You can also follow James on Twitter @JamesdRobinson. What do you think of the news?

312 Comments

Avatar image for sohanlon07
sohanlon07

54

Forum Posts

158

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By sohanlon07

After listening to your podcast last week I picked up the first few issues of Earth 2 and it is one of the best of the New 52. Absolutely love it. Such depth of character and great to see new heroes taking centre stage. I can't wait until the next issue. Robinson is a great writer.

Avatar image for kidsupreme
KidSupreme

854

Forum Posts

227

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By KidSupreme

This was a good issue!

Avatar image for gravitypress
gravitypress

2102

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By gravitypress

@cbadalucco said:

This is f****ng lame! Alan was such a cool character and now they killed him!

How does this kill him?

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90107

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

Edited By vance_astro  Moderator
@cbadalucco said:

This is fucking lame! Alan was such a cool character and now they killed him!

Please do not use profanity on these forums. Thank You.
Avatar image for CBad
CBad

3

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By CBad

This is fucking lame! Alan was such a cool character and now they killed him!

Avatar image for DP812
DP812

100

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By DP812

@gravitypress said:

Does a characters sexuality really matter? I applaud that DC is getting more diverse but it feels like they want praise for doing this. With the whole Northstar marriage thing you have a sense of progression to the next step (controversial or not). My real stance though is keep comics comics don't try to turn them into romantic novellas with pictures.

I doubt Robinson did this for praise. He's just trying to add more diversity in his cast. It seems to be that it's the media making more of an issue about this than DC.

Avatar image for askanison295
AskaniSon295

453

Forum Posts

65

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By AskaniSon295

Aren't all comicbook characters alternate reality characters. I mean if your primary exposure to Superman was the Smallville t.v. show would not new52 superman be an alternative reality character. Everyone has there own Earth-Prime or simply put the earth/univerese in which they currently enjoy the most, Right Now mines ImageComics90'sEarth/Universe Tommorrow it will Be Earth-1 of the Dc Universe.

Avatar image for theblaquebasterd
THEBlaqueBasterd

386

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By THEBlaqueBasterd

I think the reason this "scares" some ppl (shitty choice of word..disgusts is more accurate if a little offensive).. is the commonality.. when we read comics we like to relate.. now as it happens the vast majority of comic readers are heterosexual 20 -25 yr old men with varying degrees of ignorance intelligence &tolerance.. who wether theyll admit it or not will have varying opinions on homosexuality ignorant or otherwise.. being forced fed a certain characters sexuality is bound to have an adverse effect if they then realise theyre nolonger comfortable imagining themselves in their heroes shoes... so to speak..

Avatar image for theblaquebasterd
THEBlaqueBasterd

386

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By THEBlaqueBasterd

@DP812: bawwwwhahahahah..... this!!

-_-

Avatar image for gravitypress
gravitypress

2102

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By gravitypress

Does a characters sexuality really matter? I applaud that DC is getting more diverse but it feels like they want praise for doing this. With the whole Northstar marriage thing you have a sense of progression to the next step (controversial or not). My real stance though is keep comics comics don't try to turn them into romantic novellas with pictures.

Avatar image for DP812
DP812

100

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By DP812

@GrandHarrier said:

@DP812: To be fair, DC claimed the new 52 was a relaunch, not a reboot. Which, we all know, was a pile of lies. But for many people they accepted this company line, so to suddenly have a character take a literal 180 from who and what he is, can be extremely disconcerting. I, personally, think its a stupid move. Rather than introduce a new character and make us like him (like Bunker, I've grown to enjoy him in Teen Titans), Mr. Robinson fundamentally changes an iconic character.

Would people be OK if DC suddenly changed Batwoman to be straight (again, like she was originally). Would it be accepted and celebrated, or decried? If people would take offense to it, why are we unable to take offense to this change?

You're arguing semantics in regards to the relaunch/reboot. Fact of the matter is, the majority of DC's characters HAVE been completely rebooted.

Is Alan Scott still a powerful guy? Yes.

Is he still a Green Lantern? Yes.

Is he still a great hero? Yes.

Is he still a leader the rest of the JSA looks up to? Yes.

Way I see it, the fact that he now sleeps with men instead of women is hardly a literal 180 from who and what he is. His sexuality is not nor has it ever been a defining character trait.

If Alan had been turned into a gay stereotype who spoke with a lisp and made bad jokes like, "I'm the biggest FLAMER around!" then you'd be justified in making the literal 180 shift claim. That's not what's happened, so your complaint seems to be based more on your own personal homophobia than anything else.

Avatar image for DP812
DP812

100

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By DP812

@mrmisanthrope said:

@DP812:

Did you seriously just assert that anyone who doesn't like this change "should not breed" as if opinions are passed on genetically?

The irony of every stupid word you just posted is hilarious.

The assertion that this is just completely normal, and every comic should have gay characters is completely illogical too. Homosexuals represent 2-4% of the population, yet in a cheap attempt to draw in the lowest, most base audience -not homosexuals themselves as again, only 2-4% of the population, but the female neckbeard autists who populate the social justice circlejerk communities on Tumblr posting two-frame gifs of Mass Effect, Doctor Who and actor interviews with the male cast of Avengers.

Congratulations, you''ve just managed to perfectly express irony.

Avatar image for broo1232
broo1232

1664

Forum Posts

3848

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 180

User Lists: 45

Edited By broo1232

Can't wait.

Avatar image for Trodorne
Trodorne

2773

Forum Posts

6416

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 58

User Lists: 15

Edited By Trodorne

Gay characters have no shock value to me anymore. just tell a good story and his orientation should not matter at all. If he is still a power house like he was back in the old continuity. this will be good. and i can't wait to read about Jay Garrick

Avatar image for static_shock
Static Shock

53302

Forum Posts

12480

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Static Shock

@leejunfan83 said:

Is he going to make giant dildos for himself?

Please don't say things like that.

Avatar image for redberry
Redberry

818

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redberry

@GrandHarrier said:

@DP812: To be fair, DC claimed the new 52 was a relaunch, not a reboot. Which, we all know, was a pile of lies. But for many people they accepted this company line, so to suddenly have a character take a literal 180 from who and what he is, can be extremely disconcerting. I, personally, think its a stupid move. Rather than introduce a new character and make us like him (like Bunker, I've grown to enjoy him in Teen Titans), Mr. Robinson fundamentally changes an iconic character.

Would people be OK if DC suddenly changed Batwoman to be straight (again, like she was originally). Would it be accepted and celebrated, or decried? If people would take offense to it, why are we unable to take offense to this change?

Partly because there are barely any gay characters in comparison to the straight.

Avatar image for grandharrier
GrandHarrier

130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By GrandHarrier

@DP812: To be fair, DC claimed the new 52 was a relaunch, not a reboot. Which, we all know, was a pile of lies. But for many people they accepted this company line, so to suddenly have a character take a literal 180 from who and what he is, can be extremely disconcerting. I, personally, think its a stupid move. Rather than introduce a new character and make us like him (like Bunker, I've grown to enjoy him in Teen Titans), Mr. Robinson fundamentally changes an iconic character.

Would people be OK if DC suddenly changed Batwoman to be straight (again, like she was originally). Would it be accepted and celebrated, or decried? If people would take offense to it, why are we unable to take offense to this change?

Avatar image for leejunfan83
leejunfan83

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By leejunfan83

The visual is kinda funny though

Avatar image for redberry
Redberry

818

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redberry

@leejunfan83 said:

Is he going to make giant dildos for himself?

That is a bit uncalled for...

Avatar image for leejunfan83
leejunfan83

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By leejunfan83

Is he going to make giant dildos for himself?

Avatar image for smart_dork_dude
Smart_Dork_Dude

3366

Forum Posts

95

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By Smart_Dork_Dude

@Redberry said:

He's still a fearless leader who everyone looks up to. :)

That fact alone is the reason I'm still reading the book. Personally I love the idea of taking the Golden Age characters and giving them origins in modern times, it's fresh and interesting to see. I love the JSA, so seeing a modern take on them is very interesting.

Avatar image for redberry
Redberry

818

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redberry

@Smart_Dork_Dude said:

@Redberry: Alan Scott will always be one of my favorite DC characters, and character in general, so I'm still going to read the book. However, it'll be a long time before I'm okay with this. Also, they did get rid of Deadpool's scars.

I know, that is why I'm using it as an example. I don't like the changes if you check the thread with that topic. This is not the first time DC reboots their franchise, and it may happen again in the future. I know that people are not used to changes, so I do understand the disappointment. Look on the bright side, everything else about him would still remains the same. He's still a fearless leader who everyone looks up to. :)

Avatar image for redberry
Redberry

818

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redberry

@mrmisanthrope said:

@Redberry said:

I'm not saying you are homophobic, but plenty of racist people have friends of different races, just saying.

I find this funny because the writer being interviewed in this article pulls the exact same thing by stating he lives in San Francisco and has gay friends, but you didn't take any issue with him making the justification.

I'm just saying people shouldn't use that statement as an argument because it's false. I don't think the writer is using that logic. He's simply stating that he has gay friends, and he finds that being gay is just a part of who they are. He didn't use this "I can't be ______ because I have ______ friend". logic. I don't see the kind of statement from the writer. It's two different statements to me.

Avatar image for randomatom
RandomAtom

48

Forum Posts

28

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By RandomAtom

Hey, guess what, this is useless/stupid/out of touch and why I hate DC now. Don't make good old things bad, make new good things. For me the new 52 is a bad dream, a nightmare, even. A nightmare I am no longer willing to support.

Avatar image for smart_dork_dude
Smart_Dork_Dude

3366

Forum Posts

95

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By Smart_Dork_Dude

@Redberry: Alan Scott will always be one of my favorite DC characters, and character in general, so I'm still going to read the book. However, it'll be a long time before I'm okay with this. Also, they did get rid of Deadpool's scars.

Avatar image for cytorrak
Cytorrak

114

Forum Posts

615

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Cytorrak

@Redberry said:

I'm not saying you are homophobic, but plenty of racist people have friends of different races, just saying.

I find this funny because the writer being interviewed in this article pulls the exact same thing by stating he lives in San Francisco and has gay friends, but you didn't take any issue with him making the justification.

Avatar image for redberry
Redberry

818

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redberry

@Smart_Dork_Dude said:

@Redberry: Fair enough. But what if DC decided to make one of your favorite characters, a character that you instantly liked the moment you saw and loved his history and story, and out of nowhere totally changed his character? I'll still read the book, I'm just dealing with the fact that they're messing with a character that not only I love, but plenty of other people do as well. Alan Scott has been around for 72 years, and has managed to maintain a fanbase of both young who might have discovered by going through their grandparents old comics(Me) and old that was growing up when those old comics where new. It's a hard thing to deal with for me. I'm not gay, I don't understand it, but I don't hate gay people or believe every stereotype I've heard about them.

Like I said, I'm not saying you're homophobic, I'm just saying that wasn't a valid argument. I do understand why you're upset. You invested in the character, so when they change something about them so drastically, it's not going to be easy for you to accept. I think one of my top favorites is Deadpool, so if they take away his scars, I would be angry, too, because I feel like the scars are one of his defining characteristics. I would eventually accept it though. You have the right to be angry, I understand that. I would still read the book with the character in it because even though something about them changed, I'd still support the character, no matter what. It's a reboot, so things changed. Superman's origin has been changed several things. I just look at this as one of the changes that I would have to accept.

Avatar image for smart_dork_dude
Smart_Dork_Dude

3366

Forum Posts

95

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By Smart_Dork_Dude

@Redberry: Fair enough. But what if DC decided to make one of your favorite characters, a character that you instantly liked the moment you saw and loved his history and story, and out of nowhere totally changed his character? I'll still read the book, I'm just dealing with the fact that they're messing with a character that not only I love, but plenty of other people do as well. Alan Scott has been around for 72 years, and has managed to maintain a fanbase of both young who might have discovered by going through their grandparents old comics(Me) and old that was growing up when those old comics where new. It's a hard thing to deal with for me. I'm not gay, I don't understand it, but I don't hate gay people or believe every stereotype I've heard about them.

Avatar image for redberry
Redberry

818

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redberry

@Smart_Dork_Dude said:

Now before anyone rips into me for this, let me explain my point of few on this. Alan Scott is my absolute favorite Green Lantern of all time, and ranks pretty high on my "All time Favorites" list. This is a Golden Age character that has been around since 1940 and without him we wouldn't even have the Green Lantern Corps at all. Now I don't mind change, but not change for the sake of change! Updating a characters costume to fit with modern times? Sure, if it looks totally ridiculous. If they were just changing his costume then I'd be fine(Even I can admit, that his costume needed a little more green. At least an all green cape). But anyway, this just too much of a change to the character. If they were going to do this, then it should have been with Starman. One of the Starman's was gay anyway so I wouldn't exactly care. This is a purposeless change and is just a shameless publicity stunt to get people to read the book. Before anyone says I'm a homophobe, I have a cousin that's a lesbian and we're very close so don't go that route with me

I'm not saying you are homophobic, but plenty of racist people have friends of different races, just saying.

Avatar image for redberry
Redberry

818

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redberry

@sunhawk said:

why not Power Girl? she is one of the minor kryptonian heroes, then you could reintroduce Atlee and there would be much rejoicing.

Because James doesn't write that series. He writes Earth-2.

Avatar image for sunhawk
sunhawk

650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By sunhawk

why not Power Girl? she is one of the minor kryptonian heroes, then you could reintroduce Atlee and there would be much rejoicing.

Avatar image for smart_dork_dude
Smart_Dork_Dude

3366

Forum Posts

95

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By Smart_Dork_Dude

Now before anyone rips into me for this, let me explain my point of few on this. Alan Scott is my absolute favorite Green Lantern of all time, and ranks pretty high on my "All time Favorites" list. This is a Golden Age character that has been around since 1940 and without him we wouldn't even have the Green Lantern Corps at all. Now I don't mind change, but not change for the sake of change! Updating a characters costume to fit with modern times? Sure, if it looks totally ridiculous. If they were just changing his costume then I'd be fine(Even I can admit, that his costume needed a little more green. At least an all green cape). But anyway, this just too much of a change to the character. If they were going to do this, then it should have been with Starman. One of the Starman's was gay anyway so I wouldn't exactly care. This is a purposeless change and is just a shameless publicity stunt to get people to read the book. Before anyone says I'm a homophobe, I have a cousin that's a lesbian and we're very close so don't go that route with me

Avatar image for cytorrak
Cytorrak

114

Forum Posts

615

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Cytorrak

@DP812:

Did you seriously just assert that anyone who doesn't like this change "should not breed" as if opinions are passed on genetically?

The irony of every stupid word you just posted is hilarious.

Avatar image for cytorrak
Cytorrak

114

Forum Posts

615

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Cytorrak

This is pretty asinine for a number of reasons. I think the most annoying aspect about this is that in this article it's stated that it's simultaneously very important, and not important at all. They want to both say it's groundbreaking and new, and completely ordinary and nothing special. It's one or the other.

The assertion that this is just completely normal, and every comic should have gay characters is completely illogical too. Homosexuals represent 2-4% of the population, yet in a cheap attempt to draw in the lowest, most base audience -not homosexuals themselves as again, only 2-4% of the population, but the female neckbeard autists who populate the social justice circlejerk communities on Tumblr posting two-frame gifs of Mass Effect, Doctor Who and actor interviews with the male cast of Avengers.

How does 2-4% in real life translate to 20% in comics?

It's also completely and utterly asinine for him to claim this is new and groundbreaking as if no one's heard of Apollo and Midnighter? It's just as disingenuous for Marvel to claim they're having the first gay wedding in comics given that again, those two characters did it years ago, and there have been others as well.

But then, I've hated pretty much all of the changes made in the New 52. I think damn near all of their decisions have been mind-bogglingly stupid. I'm not the target audience of mouthbreathers, and dejected reviewers mindlessly applauding any decision made by a dying industry continually alienating as much of their audience as possible by being unable to think beyond the mindset of someone from California or New York.

Avatar image for jorgeareizaga
jorgeareizaga

483

Forum Posts

21

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jorgeareizaga

THIS IS FANTASTIC, I ALWAYS FELT ALAN SCOTT WAS GAY

GREAT DECISION DC!!!!!!!!!!!!

Avatar image for DP812
DP812

100

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By DP812

For all the comics they've consumed preaching about tolerance and acceptance, there are some really narrow-minded comic readers out there.

Robinson decided to make the character gay on his own. It was his idea, that's it. It's been picked up by the media because gay rights is a big issue at this time. So enough with the "this is just a cheap shock tactic!" If DC had introduced a new gay character, like some self-professed "open-minded" people are saying they should have done, those exact same people would be on here complaining that introducing new gay characters is a cheap shock tactic. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

And no, DC is not "flushing away decades of continuity" with this move -- they already did that. That's the entire point of the New 52 -- it's a REBOOT! And it's a reboot that happened about eight months ago, have you still not figured this out yet?

Also, anyone who decides they're not going to read Earth-2 because Alan Scott now likes dudes -- sorry, but despite all your claims to the contrary, yes, you are a homophobe. Accept it, move on, and please do not breed.

Avatar image for redberry
Redberry

818

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redberry

@SylentEcho said:

I don't mind that Alan's gay, it's just that in panels where he's romancing his partner or whatever is a little weird for me coz I'm not used to seeing two dudes make out in a comic or in real life for that matter. Sorry if I offend, I'm just trying to be honest and not sugar-coat this. Apart from that it's all cool

I just hope there aren't any sexual scenes between two gay people (at least for now) because that would confuse the hell out of little kids that don't know the difference between straight and gay.

Plus for everyone who thinks this is a cop-out, it's not. Alan Scott is a major DC character and this is the only version of him that will exist. It's not like the normal continuity will have an Alan Scott as well.

People giving straight kisses all the time in comic. I feel like kids are smarter than that. We're a product of our environment. People are not comfortable often because they're not used to seeing something growing up. I know people who are uncomfortable around black folks simply because there aren't any while they're growing up. Those who grow up watching all things straight could still be gay. IMO, sexual orientation is something you was born with. You're uncomfortable because you don't find guys to be attractive. It's just the same for gays and lesbians in which they don't find the opposite sex to be attractive. I don't think you're being offensive. We all have our opinion. If you're straight, you're not gonna find gay stuffs appealing, so it's understandable. :)

Avatar image for sylentecho
SylentEcho

78

Forum Posts

445

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 7

Edited By SylentEcho

I don't mind that Alan's gay, it's just that in panels where he's romancing his partner or whatever is a little weird for me coz I'm not used to seeing two dudes make out in a comic or in real life for that matter. Sorry if I offend, I'm just trying to be honest and not sugar-coat this. Apart from that it's all cool

I just hope there aren't any sexual scenes between two gay people (at least for now) because that would confuse the hell out of little kids that don't know the difference between straight and gay.

Plus for everyone who thinks this is a cop-out, it's not. Alan Scott is a major DC character and this is the only version of him that will exist. It's not like the normal continuity will have an Alan Scott as well.

Avatar image for kimi74
kimi74

95

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 3

Edited By kimi74

I haven't read the issue but with what I've read here I'm wishing it was done with a bit more subtlety.. This suggests a lack of creativity to me. Quite disappointing. Build it up. Slowly. Develop the character. Then bring it up. Love the idea of Alan being gay, just not how it was introduced. I loved the JSA history prior to the New 52. I was relatively new to it (only 2-3 years into it) but happily exploring the stories that made the JSA. Now, with these changes, I'll read it but with a significant amount of caution. I'll drop it quickly if there isn't some sort of nod to the roots that made the team. Jade & Obsidian.. I have always liked Obsidian. I first read about him when he was in Justice League of America with Nuklon, Fire, Ice (and Icemaiden), Power Girl, etc... His development since these times is significant. And Jade... While I don't know a lot about her I have always sought out issues where I know she is featured. (It was because of Jade I got into The Outsiders)... If and when she is introduced I hope it appeals to me as much as what her character always has... And if I don't like the story I just won't buy it anymore. Fastest way to make a point to any publisher.

Avatar image for mysteryman38
MysteryMan38

22

Forum Posts

1176

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By MysteryMan38

I agree with the comments about the JSA being suddenly revamped and younger, thereby throwing away 71 years of history. I am only 19, but I've been a fan of DC comics since I was 8, heck of comics in general. When I first started reading, I also started digging into the history of comics, especially during the Golden Age. The JSA has always been one of my favorite super-teams, reading collected volumes of their original adventures, and the new pre-Flashpoint stuff, when the team consisted mainly of second and third generation heroes taking up the reigns of their original predecessors. And leading that new team, or at least acting in leadership capacity, were Flash, Green Lantern and Wildcat, teaching these new young heroes what it means to be a hero. But with this new 52 thing of DC's, throwing away so much history, but at the same time bringing in such new and riveting stories, well I'm torn. I actually nearly started to get weepy while reading Earth 2 #1, but realized that for Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman to die on this world, it meant that a revamped JSA wouldn't have to be in the shadow of the Big Three, and therefore march forward with big strides, saving the day, righting wrongs like they used to, back when comics were a dime, there was a war on and comics were just starting out as a new medium to capture the hearts and minds of its readers the way the pulp novels did during the 30's. And as for Alan being gay now, I've got no problem with gays or lesbians, heck my aunt, my mother's little sister is lesbian. She married, and she and her partner have two wonderful little boys now. But to make the original Green Lantern, a hero so strong in his convictions, his sense of right and wrong and never had to question a situation before because he always knew that so long as he kept his wits and had the ring charged (and there was no wood around to break through his constructs) he could do his job and make the world a safer place, to make him gay, well that threw me off at first, made me mad and puzzled as to why DC would make this to change to one of their oldest characters (fighting the good fight for 71 years). So long as they don't make his sexuality the defining point of his character, so long as they continue to have him be a good, moral man, who knows what needs to be done and gets the job done, then I'm ok with it. Come the 6th, I'm getting my copy of issue #2, and I hope other people will as well, and thrill as the JSA comes back young, and fighting the good fight just like always.

Avatar image for madeinbangladesh
MadeinBangladesh

12494

Forum Posts

53

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 172

Edited By MadeinBangladesh

It's nice that DC and Marvel sees everyone equally. Those million stupid hating moms that are against it needs a miion slaps.

Avatar image for colonyofcells
colonyofcells

2038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By colonyofcells

I also live near san francisco and I do have lots of gay co workers and gay friends. I am ok with rebooting or improving old characters to keep up with the times. All old characters will need changes about every 5-10 years.

Avatar image for csl316
csl316

170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By csl316

"I mean, I live in San Francisco, I have plenty of gay friends and their sexuality is just a part of who they are. Obviously there's a whole lot more to all of them and Alan Scott is the same way."

^ These are pretty much my thoughts, except for the San Francisco thing.

Avatar image for laserlambert
LaserLambert

641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By LaserLambert

Alan Scott's gay? that explains his old costume *rimshot*

Also I'm sure the wood joke has been beat into the ground by now.

Avatar image for redberry
Redberry

818

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redberry

@MlSTERFANTASTlC said:

Alan Scott's boyfriend looks like a dweeb. Alan can do so much better.

He looks 5 feet 5... Alan has really low standard for a rich and good-looking guy.

Avatar image for mlsterfantastlc
MlSTERFANTASTlC

15

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MlSTERFANTASTlC

Alan Scott's boyfriend looks like a dweeb. Alan can do so much better.

Avatar image for redheadedatrocitus
RedheadedAtrocitus

6958

Forum Posts

8982

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 3

I'm fie with it as long as they find a way of bringing Obsidian and Jade into the picture somewhere down the line.

Avatar image for deawoncdelaney
DeawonCDelaney

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By DeawonCDelaney

I promise you they were probably looking to turn Hal, Kyle, John Stewart or Guy homosexual but said no lets go with the least recognizable because we would loos fans. I bet when everyone went to Yahoo or MSn, or whatever web browser you use when you seen Green Lantern Gay in top news you almost lost it.

Avatar image for redberry
Redberry

818

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redberry

@spiderbat87 said:

@Redberry said:

@spiderbat87 said:

@Redberry said:

I just notice how tiny his boyfriend is. It's like every gay couple in comics have to had a muscle guy and a small guy like: Wiccan and Hulkling, Colossus and Northstar, Alan Scott and his boyfriend, arguably Apollo and Midnighter as well, :p

What?

Colossus is gay in Ultimate. They were caught in bed together, and at some points, Colossus hugged and cried over a dying Northstar. You didn't know?

I knew he was gay in Ultimate but I didn't know that Northstar had even been introduced

His storyline is very tragic in comparison with the 616 counterpart though since he becomes paralyzed after an event. I find it kinda strange to pair Colossus with same gay character of the 616 universe. It would be more interesting if it was someone less predictable.

Avatar image for jonny_anonymous
Jonny_Anonymous

45773

Forum Posts

11109

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 32

Edited By Jonny_Anonymous
@Redberry said:

@spiderbat87 said:

@Redberry said:

I just notice how tiny his boyfriend is. It's like every gay couple in comics have to had a muscle guy and a small guy like: Wiccan and Hulkling, Colossus and Northstar, Alan Scott and his boyfriend, arguably Apollo and Midnighter as well, :p

What?

Colossus is gay in Ultimate. They were caught in bed together, and at some points, Colossus hugged and cried over a dying Northstar. You didn't know?

I knew he was gay in Ultimate but I didn't know that Northstar had even been introduced