Comic Vine News

97 Comments

Expect More Hulk in 'Avengers: Age of Ultron'

More smashing? Yes, please!

There's a lot of reasons to love Joss Whedon's The Avengers and the Hulk is absolutely one of them. Every time the Green Goliath appeared, some seriously cheerworthy moments happened. Hulk's scenes were a big highlight in the team-up film, so it's exciting to hear he'll have even more screen time in Avengers: Age of Ultron. While talking with Total Film, actor Mark Ruffalo said his role is "even bigger than last time, and it's more complex and it has more layers and a bit more arc." He also shared his thoughts on using motion capture. "I'm really tripping on the technology of this motion capture stuff… now I just completely embrace it and see it as this other exciting place we can go as performers."

No Caption Provided

Needless to say, we're pretty stoked to hear Hulk will have a more significant role in the sequel. Are you happy he'll receive more attention in the upcoming movie or would you rather see that focus go elsewhere?

Avengers: Age of Ultron is directed by Joss Whedon and is scheduled to open May 1, 2015.

Source: Total Film

97 Comments

Avatar image for battle_forum_junkie
Battle_Forum_Junkie

10331

Forum Posts

8401

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

Cool beans! Ruffalo's Hulk was the best cinimatic version of the character yet, IMO.

Avatar image for thewalkingdeadpool18
thewalkingdeadpool18

410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@extremis said:

@superguy1591 said:

@extremis: Rolls eyes, I responded to them. You guys would write terrible movies. You have no idea how pacing works, you can't stop a fight in the middle just to have the hero fly somewhere else to fight in a dry, dead surrounding just because you guys want to feel morally superior.

You have no idea how pacing works,

Enlighten me

you can't stop a fight in the middle just to have the hero fly somewhere else to fight in a dry, dead surrounding

....

just because you guys want to feel morally superior.

Excuse me, who are you again?

A DC fanboy he is a DC fanboy considering he's uneccesarily brining up MOS in a Avengers page and that he actually tried to compare Hulks morals to Supermans morals on killing...

Avatar image for guardiandevil83
Guardiandevil83

9481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Guardiandevil83

@tommythehitman said:

@guardiandevil83: Concept art from Avengers 2. God I hope this happens...

No Caption Provided

Hey dude sorry for such a late response. Anyway this is going to happen, and we should have seen it coming. Both Tony and Bruce during Avengers and their connection. The after credit scene in IM3. The latest Original sin fight that's got them connected and fighting. The fact that what? Like the first or second Invincible Hulk issue featured a fight. I think this film will be a Iron Man/Hulk centric film. Since Avengers one was basically Thor/Loki. Avengers 3 will probably be a Cap/Widow/Hawkeye film.

We will see Cap's last stand against Thanos from the Infinity Gem saga in the books.

Avatar image for superguy1591
Superguy1591

7539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Superguy1591

@thewalkingdeadpool18: Wrong person, I hate Snyder, what innocent people? You guys keep saying innocent people died, but I don't remember seeing any.

@squalleon: I compared Hulk rampaging and getting called cool to Superman getting blamed because Zod caused similar destruction and Superman couldn't stop him. Someone else mentioned Superman killing and I said he only killed Zod and in case someone says he shouldn't kill Zod...

Avatar image for rulerofthisuniverse
RulerOfThisUniverse

6518

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Meh. I wasn't a big fan of the Hulk in the Avengers and I'm not really excited for this movie.

Avatar image for wolverine008
Wolverine008

51027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

No Caption Provided

Avatar image for extremis
Extremis

3794

Forum Posts

145

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 55

@squalleon: And I said Snyder should've done more after the scene, but we're not arguing about that. We're arguing about killing people. Henry did the best with what he had, not his fault Snyder sucks. He tried to portray the agony Superman felt at the decision to kill Zod.

No Caption Provided

@extremis: Here's a tip, a villain is destroying Metropolis, Superman shows up and say "This ends now" and then he speed blitzes towards him...only to stop and say "Too many people around, let's move the fight elsewhere". Uh, first of all, why the F would the villain listen? Second, you put everyone at the edge of their seat with a cool line and now you want to stop half way? Horrid pacing.

And who am I? I'm the sexiest mofo on these boards.

No Caption Provided

Or the most defensive. I don't even know what point you're trying to prove, I never said anything about the movie, chap.

Avatar image for extremis
Extremis

3794

Forum Posts

145

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 55

@extremis said:

@superguy1591 said:

@extremis: Rolls eyes, I responded to them. You guys would write terrible movies. You have no idea how pacing works, you can't stop a fight in the middle just to have the hero fly somewhere else to fight in a dry, dead surrounding just because you guys want to feel morally superior.

You have no idea how pacing works,

Enlighten me

you can't stop a fight in the middle just to have the hero fly somewhere else to fight in a dry, dead surrounding

....

just because you guys want to feel morally superior.

Excuse me, who are you again?

A DC fanboy he is a DC fanboy considering he's uneccesarily brining up MOS in a Avengers page and that he actually tried to compare Hulks morals to Supermans morals on killing...

Yeah, you can imagine my confusion when my own morality got called into question lol

Avatar image for amazing_webhead
amazing_webhead

10761

Forum Posts

1019

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 20

I'm guessing they watched that MAD sketch?

Avatar image for kingwillie
KingWillie

597

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By KingWillie

Obviously Hulk would be in it... he was one of the most popular parts of the Avengers. they'd be stupid not to have him. This is news, lol?

Avatar image for righteous300
righteous300

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for righteous300
righteous300

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@superguy1591: You should really stop trying to argue. haven't you heard? it's a marvel character in a Marvel movie and marvel can do no wrong. DC on the other hand...

Avatar image for cuboid
Cuboid

157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

You have no idea how pacing works

I don't care to get into this debate / argument, but just wanted to say I found this funny because I think Snyder's pacing sucks. It's one of the main problems I have with a lot of his films, including MOS. (I did like MOS, but found it had horrible pacing)

Avatar image for k4tzm4n
k4tzm4n

41857

Forum Posts

9127

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

k4tzm4n  Moderator

Obviously Hulk would be in it... he was one of the most popular parts of the Avengers. they'd be stupid not to have him. This is news, lol?

The article isn't saying, "Hey everyone! Hulk is in the movie!" Everyone knows that. The article exists to share Mark Ruffalo's latest comments on his role in this sequel -- a role which he says is "bigger and more complex." Considering he was such a great part of the first movie, it's worth letting people know we'll get even more of him the second time around.

Avatar image for GrimoireMyst
GrimoireMyst

639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Great news. Love the Hulk having more screen time.

Avatar image for tbemrmccoy
TBEMrMcCoy

1543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Why is Superman even in this thread? More Hulk in Avengers 2. Yes please.

Avatar image for fallen_crippled
Fallen_Crippled

6475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I've heard there will be a lot of Scarlet Witch, Quicksilver, and Hawkeye too. And we all know Tony will be probably getting the most screentime... just saying. A lot of screentime is expected for a lot of characters...

Avatar image for superguy1591
Superguy1591

7539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Superguy1591

@thewalkingdeadpool18: Didn't Banner tell us he can control The Hulk? I mean, Cap even gave him the order to "smash", which means the Hulk was anything but a rage filled monster with no control.

Isn't it irresponsible of Cap to unleash someone like Hulk in a populated city?

Avatar image for iamthelaw
IAmTheLaw

1076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Hulk was the best part of the first movie, so I'm pumped that we will see more of him. The banter between Stark and Banner was also quite entertaining.

I've read that we can expect more Hawkeye as well, fear not!

Avatar image for comicace3
comicace3

12438

Forum Posts

1465

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Me gusta

Avatar image for shadowswordmaster
ShadowSwordmaster

19974

Forum Posts

10454

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 13

That is good to hear.

Avatar image for mattwing87
mattwing87

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Hopefully someday we get a Hulk and Red Hulk fight!!!

Avatar image for kingwillie
KingWillie

597

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By KingWillie

@k4tzm4n said:

@kingwillie said:

Obviously Hulk would be in it... he was one of the most popular parts of the Avengers. they'd be stupid not to have him. This is news, lol?

The article isn't saying, "Hey everyone! Hulk is in the movie!" Everyone knows that. The article exists to share Mark Ruffalo's latest comments on his role in this sequel -- a role which he says is "bigger and more complex." Considering he was such a great part of the first movie, it's worth letting people know we'll get even more of him the second time around.

Still feel like that was a given. Good news regardless, Ruffalo's Hulk is awesome.

Avatar image for aliltron
Aliltron

234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 16

Meh I'd rather have more Black Widow or Hawkeye than Hulk

Avatar image for beaconofstrength
BeaconofStrength

12491

Forum Posts

75

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Now, I want to expect more Hank Pym in AoA.

Avatar image for christianrapper
christianrapper

8540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

you guys are funny. arguing over d.c. vs marvel. who cares. the writers go back and forth anyway. you guys act like the hulk and superman are your cousins or something like that. i think most people like both books anyway. i hope they let the hulk speak this time. he talks in the comics and cartoons. he does say more than 'hulk smash'.

as for the 'mos'. superman had to cause the little destruction that he did. what was he supposed to do? they had a machine that was destroying the world. if he would have flown away, the villains would have just finished destroying the planet. the question for me is why would they even want to terra-form the earth? they were developing god like powers anyway. zod's motivation for killing man kind was my problem.

i would love to see a planet hulk film. that would be great. the animated film was awesome.

Avatar image for guardiandevil83
Guardiandevil83

9481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

you guys are funny. arguing over d.c. vs marvel. who cares. the writers go back and forth anyway. you guys act like the hulk and superman are your cousins or something like that. i think most people like both books anyway. i hope they let the hulk speak this time. he talks in the comics and cartoons. he does say more than 'hulk smash'.

as for the 'mos'. superman had to cause the little destruction that he did. what was he supposed to do? they had a machine that was destroying the world. if he would have flown away, the villains would have just finished destroying the planet. the question for me is why would they even want to terra-form the earth? they were developing god like powers anyway. zod's motivation for killing man kind was my problem.

i would love to see a planet hulk film. that would be great. the animated film was awesome.

Now that I think about it.....what?!? lol

Avatar image for cosmicoldguy
CosmicOldGuy

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@thewalkingdeadpool18 Well said!!!

Avatar image for bezza
Bezza

5019

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By Bezza

..Man, how did this thread get hijacked by a bunch of Superman fans arguing over Superman killing Zod, I mean FFS !!!!!!

This is a thread about Hulk getting more airtime in the Avengers movie. Please go and debate Superman v Zod in the Superman forum, In fact don't because its been done to death over there too.....

Rant over....

PS, Planet Hulk= yes please, but it will never happen.

Avatar image for christianrapper
christianrapper

8540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@bezza said:

..Man, how did this thread get hijacked by a bunch of Superman fans arguing over Superman killing Zod, I mean FFS !!!!!!

This is a thread about Hulk getting more airtime in the Avengers movie. Please go and debate Superman v Zod in the Superman forum, In fact don't because its been done to death over there too.....

Rant over....

PS, Planet Hulk= yes please, but it will never happen.

the people at marvel did say that planet hulk might not happen because it was hulk's story. bruce banner wouldn't get any screen time. i hope they make a hulk movie with an intelligent hulk. i am sick of him being some kind of rampaging monster. the first 2 movies covered that.

Avatar image for wubadubtub
Wubadubtub

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Sick! HULK SMASH!!

Avatar image for Feartheliving
FearTheLiving

8837

Forum Posts

125466

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@frozenedge said:

Was hoping we'd get more Hawkeye in this movie, considering he's the only Avengers who hasn't done much of anything. Hell Stark cracked more jokes then he did and Clint is supposed to be the smart mouthed asshole of the team

Thank you! This is something that's been bothering me the whole time about Hawkeye. I want Clint cracking jokes and where the heck are his names for everyone? It's cool that Hulk will get some love but poor Hawkeye has had no time developing as a member of the team other than being yanked into the big fight at the end. They need to show some of his growth as a member.

More Clint character development is a must especially if they aren't going to either A) Make him get his own movie or B) Team him up with other heroes (aka Black Widow). I will say one thing they did for Clint in Avengers was make him out to be a bad ass. Now all they have to do is keep that up and show some of his personality in the sequel. I really hope they don't turn him into a super serious character because of Iron Man. (Who seems to have gotten the best sarcastic lines.

Avatar image for thewalkingdeadpool18
thewalkingdeadpool18

410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@thewalkingdeadpool18: MoS was garbage? What's your definition of a good movie?

hmmmmm i would probbably say a good movie....is a good movie. MOS had complete utter trash writing. Terrible script,terrible characterizations of awesome comic book characters, wooden acting, all the acting and character were wooden they had no personality and apparently none of these talented actor decided to try and ACT in the movie. The only people who like MOS are DC fanboys and people who like MOS for the bayfest second half of the movie with Zod and Superman.

Avatar image for thewalkingdeadpool18
thewalkingdeadpool18

410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@superguy1591:

Do you know anything about Hulk? No Bruce can't control Hulk he's learned how to pretty much control when he releases Hulk but if you get Bruce mad enough he can release Hulk when he doesn't want to release Hulk. But he can also make himself angry to release the Hulk. But when he's the Hulk he can't control The Hulk you just got to aim Hulk at the bad guys the aliens were shooting at Hulk not the Avengers so Hulk knew to attack the aliens but Hulk also didn't care if he killed innocent people while he fought the aliens. Superman does care if he kills innocent people and Superman killed innocent people there are scenes in MOS where is Sups punched with the other hand he wouldn't have smashed Zod into a populated building....so he punches Zod with the arm that will send him into a populated building.

If you don't like MOS why are you going out of your way to try and defend the destruction in Man of Steel?

Avatar image for superguy1591
Superguy1591

7539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@thewalkingdeadpool18: Again, if Hulk is this walking killing machine, why did Captain America set him loose? You would think as responsible a hero as Cap is, he would use better judgement and NOT allow Banner to turn into Hulk and even less likely to tell him to "smash".

Avatar image for thewalkingdeadpool18
thewalkingdeadpool18

410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@superguy1591:

I could repeat why they let Hulk help them against the aliens but sine you're obviously a DC fanboy just from the pure fact you uneccessarly brought up MOS but lets pretend there isn't reasoning behind Cap letting Hulk help them fight the aliens....it's still not the equivilant of fighting without any regard for the safety of other straight up smashing the alien through buildings killing innocent people when you could've easily missed the building and not kill innocents.

Avatar image for son_of_simba
Son_of_simba

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@guardiandevil83: thor doesnt need iron mans help mate he would just get in the way and stop thor from going all out

Avatar image for righteous300
righteous300

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By righteous300

@mrtummytumms said:

@thewalkingdeadpool18: MoS was garbage? What's your definition of a good movie?

hmmmmm i would probbably say a good movie....is a good movie. MOS had complete utter trash writing. Terrible script,terrible characterizations of awesome comic book characters, wooden acting, all the acting and character were wooden they had no personality and apparently none of these talented actor decided to try and ACT in the movie. The only people who like MOS are DC fanboys and people who like MOS for the bayfest second half of the movie with Zod and Superman.

Ehh that's your opinion.

Avatar image for super_buck
Super_Buck

1664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for kounurasaka
KouNurasaka

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I was never ever a Hulk fan before Avengers, but I think I see why people like him. I don't think I will ever feel the urge to pick up a Hulk comic or trade, but I certainly don't mind seeing more of him in Avengers.

Also, Ruffalo is excellent.

Avatar image for freddy_17
Freddy_17

4

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

CGI should have been used for the rhino in spider man 2....that mechanical rhino sucked!!!!

Avatar image for dum529001
dum529001

3991

Forum Posts

141

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By dum529001

@mrtummytumms said:
@thewalkingdeadpool18 said:

@mrtummytumms said:

@thewalkingdeadpool18: MoS was garbage? What's your definition of a good movie?

hmmmmm i would probbably say a good movie....is a good movie. MOS had complete utter trash writing. Terrible script,terrible characterizations of awesome comic book characters, wooden acting, all the acting and character were wooden they had no personality and apparently none of these talented actor decided to try and ACT in the movie. The only people who like MOS are DC fanboys and people who like MOS for the bayfest second half of the movie with Zod and Superman.

Ehh that's your opinion.

1. Have a bunch of speeches about being a savior of the earth

And then..........

Have superman act all mopey and not show the reason why he does what he does and why its worth it. The motive of the hero is what makes a superhero movie. Also, Clark's adopted dad has illogical morals. Does Superman end up inheriting this?

Even Zod has no real motives in this movie. Why would living as being with power superior to everyone else be difficult? "Oh no, my herculean-level powers will be the death of me!" said no one EVER.

2. And then have the movie be dimly lit to make it look even more depressing. When did a Superman movie become a Batman movie? Even Batman movies don't look this dark and depressing.

And why is the camera shaking on certain scenes?!

And then they try to make Superman seem down to earth like Batman but he can't be,never has been and never will be. He's a superpowered alien. immagrant that grew up as native, not a man in suit with some great toys on a tool-belt.

3. Then have CG that looks as real as the graphics of an outdated game console.

Also, not only does the CG looks fake when not moving, it also looks fake while in motion. The scenes attempting to display superhuman speed just look like they pressed the fast forward button. Punches and fighting motions did not have any gradual acceleration, where top speed is reached in a fraction of a second but not instantly.

If half the movie is fighting then at least make it look somewhat believable. I've seen CG from the 2000 or 2003, that's looks better than this movie that came out in 2013. If CG from a decade or more ago is better than something that's from current times, then the CG being used in the specified movie is garbage.

And if it was a real fight them Superman and Zod should have shown more signs of exertion ,damage or fatigue. These guys didn't look like they were putting any effort at all. There was zero feeling of intensity coming from the two combatants.

And the fighting had zero finesse. Superman, Zod and the rest fought like babies. It looked like a game of patty cake rather than a fight. They were either trying to be polite and wait for the other to throw their shots or they were running into each others punches as if they were blind.

By the way, crashing through buildings and stuff is not what makes a superpowered fight scene cool.

4. And why is Lois Lane showing up everywhere just for easy ways to move the plot along? Nothing but cheap Plot Convenience. Also, how Pa Kent, Superman adopted father died was just a plot convenience. Pa Kent died for a dog andtold Superman not to save him even though Superman could have doenfaster than anyone could see him and claim some believable lie as to why his father survived.

5. Superman wrecks some guys car just because he got insulted. Why would Superman abuse his power like that?

This movie was a total disgrace to Superman. The worst Superman movie to date.

.

Avatar image for righteous300
righteous300

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By righteous300

@mrtummytumms said:
@thewalkingdeadpool18 said:

@mrtummytumms said:

@thewalkingdeadpool18: MoS was garbage? What's your definition of a good movie?

hmmmmm i would probbably say a good movie....is a good movie. MOS had complete utter trash writing. Terrible script,terrible characterizations of awesome comic book characters, wooden acting, all the acting and character were wooden they had no personality and apparently none of these talented actor decided to try and ACT in the movie. The only people who like MOS are DC fanboys and people who like MOS for the bayfest second half of the movie with Zod and Superman.

Ehh that's your opinion.

1. Have a bunch of speeches about being a savior of the earth

And then..........

Have superman act all mopey and not show the reason why he does what he does and why its worth it. The motive of the hero is what makes a superhero movie. Also, Clark's adopted dad has illogical morals. Does Superman end up inheriting this?

2. And then have the movie be dimly lit to make it look even more depressing. When did a Superman movie become a Batman movie? Even Batman movies don't look this dark and depressing.

And why is the camera shaking on certain scenes?!

And then they try to make Superman seem down to earth like Batman but he can't be,never has been and never will be. He's a superpowered alien immagrant that grew up as native, not a man in suit with some great toys on a tool-belt.

3. Then have CG that looks as real as the graphics of an outdated game console.

Also, not only does the CG looks fake when not moving, it also looks fake while in motion. The scenes attempting to display superhuman speed just look like they pressed the fast forward button. Punches and fighting motions did not have any gradual acceleration, where top speed is reached in a fraction of a second but not instantly.

If half the movie is fighting then at least make it look somewhat believable. I've seen CG from the 2000 or 2003, that's looks better than this movie that came out in 2013. If CG from a decade or more ago is better than something that's from current times, then the CG being used in the specified movie is garbage.

4. And why is Lois Lane showing up everywhere just for easy ways to move the plot along? Nothing but cheap Plot Convenience. Also, how Pa Kent, Superman adopted father died was just a plot convenience.

5. Superman wrecks some guys car just because he got insulted. Why would Superman abuse his power like that?

This movie was a total disgrace to Superman. The worst Superman movie to date.

That's just your opinion.

Avatar image for dum529001
dum529001

3991

Forum Posts

141

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@dum529001 said:

@mrtummytumms said:
@thewalkingdeadpool18 said:

@mrtummytumms said:

@thewalkingdeadpool18: MoS was garbage? What's your definition of a good movie?

hmmmmm i would probbably say a good movie....is a good movie. MOS had complete utter trash writing. Terrible script,terrible characterizations of awesome comic book characters, wooden acting, all the acting and character were wooden they had no personality and apparently none of these talented actor decided to try and ACT in the movie. The only people who like MOS are DC fanboys and people who like MOS for the bayfest second half of the movie with Zod and Superman.

Ehh that's your opinion.

1. Have a bunch of speeches about being a savior of the earth

And then..........

Have superman act all mopey and not show the reason why he does what he does and why its worth it. The motive of the hero is what makes a superhero movie. Also, Clark's adopted dad has illogical morals. Does Superman end up inheriting this?

2. And then have the movie be dimly lit to make it look even more depressing. When did a Superman movie become a Batman movie? Even Batman movies don't look this dark and depressing.

And why is the camera shaking on certain scenes?!

And then they try to make Superman seem down to earth like Batman but he can't be,never has been and never will be. He's a superpowered alien immagrant that grew up as native, not a man in suit with some great toys on a tool-belt.

3. Then have CG that looks as real as the graphics of an outdated game console.

Also, not only does the CG looks fake when not moving, it also looks fake while in motion. The scenes attempting to display superhuman speed just look like they pressed the fast forward button. Punches and fighting motions did not have any gradual acceleration, where top speed is reached in a fraction of a second but not instantly.

If half the movie is fighting then at least make it look somewhat believable. I've seen CG from the 2000 or 2003, that's looks better than this movie that came out in 2013. If CG from a decade or more ago is better than something that's from current times, then the CG being used in the specified movie is garbage.

4. And why is Lois Lane showing up everywhere just for easy ways to move the plot along? Nothing but cheap Plot Convenience. Also, how Pa Kent, Superman adopted father died was just a plot convenience.

5. Superman wrecks some guys car just because he got insulted. Why would Superman abuse his power like that?

This movie was a total disgrace to Superman. The worst Superman movie to date.

That's just your opinion.

The movie made no sense.

Even Zod has no real motives in this movie. Why would living as being with power superior to everyone else be difficult? "Oh no, my herculean-level powers will be the death of me!" said no one EVER.

By the way, I added two more paragraphs to my original post about the movie.

Avatar image for righteous300
righteous300

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mrtummytumms said:

@dum529001 said:

@mrtummytumms said:
@thewalkingdeadpool18 said:

@mrtummytumms said:

@thewalkingdeadpool18: MoS was garbage? What's your definition of a good movie?

hmmmmm i would probbably say a good movie....is a good movie. MOS had complete utter trash writing. Terrible script,terrible characterizations of awesome comic book characters, wooden acting, all the acting and character were wooden they had no personality and apparently none of these talented actor decided to try and ACT in the movie. The only people who like MOS are DC fanboys and people who like MOS for the bayfest second half of the movie with Zod and Superman.

Ehh that's your opinion.

1. Have a bunch of speeches about being a savior of the earth

And then..........

Have superman act all mopey and not show the reason why he does what he does and why its worth it. The motive of the hero is what makes a superhero movie. Also, Clark's adopted dad has illogical morals. Does Superman end up inheriting this?

2. And then have the movie be dimly lit to make it look even more depressing. When did a Superman movie become a Batman movie? Even Batman movies don't look this dark and depressing.

And why is the camera shaking on certain scenes?!

And then they try to make Superman seem down to earth like Batman but he can't be,never has been and never will be. He's a superpowered alien immagrant that grew up as native, not a man in suit with some great toys on a tool-belt.

3. Then have CG that looks as real as the graphics of an outdated game console.

Also, not only does the CG looks fake when not moving, it also looks fake while in motion. The scenes attempting to display superhuman speed just look like they pressed the fast forward button. Punches and fighting motions did not have any gradual acceleration, where top speed is reached in a fraction of a second but not instantly.

If half the movie is fighting then at least make it look somewhat believable. I've seen CG from the 2000 or 2003, that's looks better than this movie that came out in 2013. If CG from a decade or more ago is better than something that's from current times, then the CG being used in the specified movie is garbage.

4. And why is Lois Lane showing up everywhere just for easy ways to move the plot along? Nothing but cheap Plot Convenience. Also, how Pa Kent, Superman adopted father died was just a plot convenience.

5. Superman wrecks some guys car just because he got insulted. Why would Superman abuse his power like that?

This movie was a total disgrace to Superman. The worst Superman movie to date.

That's just your opinion.

The movie made no sense.

Even Zod has no real motives in this movie. Why would living as being with power superior to everyone else be difficult? "Oh no, my herculean-level powers will be the death of me!" said no one EVER.

By the way, I added two more paragraphs to my original post about the movie.

He had no real motives? He was trying to turn Earth into Krypton, so it could be a new home for his race. Superman asked Zod why can't they all just live in peace with humans. Zods was born to be a warrior, easier to adapt to those kinds of situations. Other people not so much. He was trying to do what he thought was best for the people of Krypton. Why make them go through what Clark had to go through as a kid, when he can just turn the planet into New Krypton and it be perfect for them.

Best Superman movie to me.

Avatar image for sophisticated_ignorance
Sophisticated_Ignorance

2715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Fuck that give us a more powerful Thor, Avengers 1 was basically Hulk 2.

Avatar image for raynorj
RaynorJ

1503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

  • 97 results
  • 1
  • 2