Check Out Mike Allred's FF Covers

...This is in no way better than the other FF team.

...this looks weird.

Thats stupid and ugly.

I really want the set so I can frame it. (super surprised at how many negative comments against Allred's art)

I thought the current FF was pretty food with franklin and the other kids.. Why the change? =(

Love Allred. This could be a lot of fun

Truly awful art

@torzone said:

This is stupid.

I agree that this is stupid only to the fact that they are renumbering it. just leave it as is and tell the god damn story.

the art is awesome, ( YES AWESOME, not ugly or terrible!!) but the team is not thrilling me as much. Not what I had in mind when I thought She Hulk would return to the FF. She should have been in a FF white and black suit

Ms Thing...?really??

This title is going to tank....

Not getting this.

@sora_thekey: Scott Lang is going to plan revenge against Dr. Doom for killing Cassie Lang. That's all I need!

Honestly, I think you all should at least try the book before dissing it. I'm extremely excited about it after hearing the premise!

Its Mike Allred, of course I'll like it, even if this may not be one of the Marvel NOW titles I'll be getting when the time comes...

Miss Thing...? Looks like she stole the Thing's skin and decided to live in it.

I just love Mike Allred's art! :D

Did they ever say which antman that is?

They're pretty plain :/
BB

Really cool

What team is this? Fantastic Four right? yeah the costumes suck & miss thing looks stupid

This is the only Marvel NOW book I'm remotely interested in...

I am looking forward to this ! Unlike LordRequiem i enjoy the art. I am really tired of the same looking stuff all the time.

That looks so ridiculous. Can someone who is excited about this explain the appeal? Genuinely curious.

I can't believe all of the negative comments; it's something different and fun. I'm excited about this book more than any other. I wonder if people had these knee jerk reactions when Allred's X-Force run was revealed? That turned out pretty great, right? I think some reader's need to expand their art style tastes and learn to appreciate the artistic achievement's of someone like Allred. It's not "poor" or "terrible", it's a different style of drawing, it's okay not to like it, but you can't argue that it isn't really well done. Some of the best coloring of Allred's work I've seen.

Love love love Allred's style. I think his She Hulk is especially awesome. I'm really looking forward to this book, his X-Force/X-Statix stuff is some of my favorite off beat marvel stuff ever. Fraction's not too shabby either usually...

I really love the talent behind this book, but I have almost zero interest due to the characters. She-Hulk is ok. Ant Man, maybe (too bad it's not Pym). As for Medusa and Girl Thing....NO. I won't be picking this book up!

@PsychoKnights: The main plot is Scott Lang wanted to end Doom for ending his daughter. I'm very excited.

And the art isn't BAD! It's a nostalgic 60's style! What's wrong with you people?

I like how She-Hulk is drawn. It looks a little silly tho albeit Mike Fraction's interview concerning it on Comic Book Resources was great.

Miss Thiing's not been in a single issue yet. You're all saying she's awful and the worst thing ever basing your opinon entirely on your own shallowness which is hypocritical because most you nerds would complain about girls doing that exact thing to you in real life...just sayin'.

@Cafeterialoca said:

@sora_thekey: Scott Lang is going to plan revenge against Dr. Doom for killing Cassie Lang. That's all I need!

That does sound interesting... I think you've convinced me!

@Cafeterialoca said:

@PsychoKnights: The main plot is Scott Lang wanted to end Doom for ending his daughter. I'm very excited.

And the art isn't BAD! It's a nostalgic 60's style! What's wrong with you people?

Sixties art was bad. We have come a long way since then. Why would we want to go back?

@PsychoKnights: With Deodato tracing his characters with 3D poser programs and Greg Land outright tracing characters, I don't see why we can't experiment around. Art isn't always stable. Art constantly changes. One of my biggest pet peeves about art in comics now a days is that a lot of it tries to be this ultra realism with maximum shading and too much browns and blues. Give me this 60's style any day!

@PsychoKnights said:

@Cafeterialoca said:

Sixties art was bad. We have come a long way since then. Why would we want to go back?

Are you serious? There's some excellent work from that age. Now, I'd give you that the coloring techniques of that age and writing are lacking by today's standards, but there's some terrific art.

@Crash_Recovery: I would even argue that art is lazier now, since coloring is done on computers.

@Cafeterialoca said:

@PsychoKnights: With Deodato tracing his characters with 3D poser programs and Greg Land outright tracing characters, I don't see why we can't experiment around. Art isn't always stable. Art constantly changes. One of my biggest pet peeves about art in comics now a days is that a lot of it tries to be this ultra realism with maximum shading and too much browns and blues. Give me this 60's style any day!

To each their own. I much prefer modern style. I hope the comic industry does experiment, but I will not be picking up those sorts of experiments.

@Crash_Recovery said:

@PsychoKnights said:

@Cafeterialoca said:

Sixties art was bad. We have come a long way since then. Why would we want to go back?

Are you serious? There's some excellent work from that age. Now, I'd give you that the coloring techniques of that age and writing are lacking by today's standards, but there's some terrific art.

I was probably a bit harsh. It was good for its time, but...just the publishing techniques themselves have come so much further these days. Why would we want to retard to the old ways? I'd also say we have a much higher quality of talent these days, but that is not to say that there was no talent in the olden days.

STOP HATIN' LOOKS COOL

@PsychoKnights said:

@Cafeterialoca said:

@PsychoKnights: With Deodato tracing his characters with 3D poser programs and Greg Land outright tracing characters, I don't see why we can't experiment around. Art isn't always stable. Art constantly changes. One of my biggest pet peeves about art in comics now a days is that a lot of it tries to be this ultra realism with maximum shading and too much browns and blues. Give me this 60's style any day!

To each their own. I much prefer modern style. I hope the comic industry does experiment, but I will not be picking up those sorts of experiments.

@Crash_Recovery said:

@PsychoKnights said:

@Cafeterialoca said:

Sixties art was bad. We have come a long way since then. Why would we want to go back?

Are you serious? There's some excellent work from that age. Now, I'd give you that the coloring techniques of that age and writing are lacking by today's standards, but there's some terrific art.

I was probably a bit harsh. It was good for its time, but...just the publishing techniques themselves have come so much further these days. Why would we want to retard to the old ways? I'd also say we have a much higher quality of talent these days, but that is not to say that there was no talent in the olden days.

Art isn't linear. People can take many stylistic approaches. If we didn't look back to the past, most new trends would never happen. You bash the 60's yet we still use a lot of the design of characters to this day. We would never have many heroes if it wasn't for Jack Kirby putting in endless days drawing away. Kirby dots originated from that man, a technique that works really well to show off energy. We still use Spider-Man's costume that originated from the 60's.

There is nothing wrong with 60's styles. Revisiting that art isn't a crime. And the art probably fits the tone of the book a lot better than say Deodato or Land, or any of those others.

Look at Team Fortress 2. They use a similar 60's sleek vibe for their game, and people love it.

I can get the knee jerk reaction from people, but I think opening your minds to different styles might be a lot better than trying to make everything feel the same manufactured look. Then everything would look exactly like the Marvel Movies, and then creativity would die after a while.

@Cafeterialoca said:

@PsychoKnights said:

@Cafeterialoca said:

@PsychoKnights: With Deodato tracing his characters with 3D poser programs and Greg Land outright tracing characters, I don't see why we can't experiment around. Art isn't always stable. Art constantly changes. One of my biggest pet peeves about art in comics now a days is that a lot of it tries to be this ultra realism with maximum shading and too much browns and blues. Give me this 60's style any day!

To each their own. I much prefer modern style. I hope the comic industry does experiment, but I will not be picking up those sorts of experiments.

@Crash_Recovery said:

@PsychoKnights said:

@Cafeterialoca said:

Sixties art was bad. We have come a long way since then. Why would we want to go back?

Are you serious? There's some excellent work from that age. Now, I'd give you that the coloring techniques of that age and writing are lacking by today's standards, but there's some terrific art.

I was probably a bit harsh. It was good for its time, but...just the publishing techniques themselves have come so much further these days. Why would we want to retard to the old ways? I'd also say we have a much higher quality of talent these days, but that is not to say that there was no talent in the olden days.

Art isn't linear. People can take many stylistic approaches. If we didn't look back to the past, most new trends would never happen. You bash the 60's yet we still use a lot of the design of characters to this day. We would never have many heroes if it wasn't for Jack Kirby putting in endless days drawing away. Kirby dots originated from that man, a technique that works really well to show off energy. We still use Spider-Man's costume that originated from the 60's.

There is nothing wrong with 60's styles. Revisiting that art isn't a crime. And the art probably fits the tone of the book a lot better than say Deodato or Land, or any of those others.

Look at Team Fortress 2. They use a similar 60's sleek vibe for their game, and people love it.

I can get the knee jerk reaction from people, but I think opening your minds to different styles might be a lot better than trying to make everything feel the same manufactured look. Then everything would look exactly like the Marvel Movies, and then creativity would die after a while.

I really don't have much to say that I haven't already said. Again, I'm glad they are trying new things, but this just doesn't appeal to me. If it appeals to you, more power to ya, but I like the modern look of things.

Also, I don't care for Team Fortress. I really don't get the infatuation.

@PsychoKnights said:

@Cafeterialoca said:

@PsychoKnights said:

@Cafeterialoca said:

@PsychoKnights: With Deodato tracing his characters with 3D poser programs and Greg Land outright tracing characters, I don't see why we can't experiment around. Art isn't always stable. Art constantly changes. One of my biggest pet peeves about art in comics now a days is that a lot of it tries to be this ultra realism with maximum shading and too much browns and blues. Give me this 60's style any day!

To each their own. I much prefer modern style. I hope the comic industry does experiment, but I will not be picking up those sorts of experiments.

@Crash_Recovery said:

@PsychoKnights said:

@Cafeterialoca said:

Sixties art was bad. We have come a long way since then. Why would we want to go back?

Are you serious? There's some excellent work from that age. Now, I'd give you that the coloring techniques of that age and writing are lacking by today's standards, but there's some terrific art.

I was probably a bit harsh. It was good for its time, but...just the publishing techniques themselves have come so much further these days. Why would we want to retard to the old ways? I'd also say we have a much higher quality of talent these days, but that is not to say that there was no talent in the olden days.

Art isn't linear. People can take many stylistic approaches. If we didn't look back to the past, most new trends would never happen. You bash the 60's yet we still use a lot of the design of characters to this day. We would never have many heroes if it wasn't for Jack Kirby putting in endless days drawing away. Kirby dots originated from that man, a technique that works really well to show off energy. We still use Spider-Man's costume that originated from the 60's.

There is nothing wrong with 60's styles. Revisiting that art isn't a crime. And the art probably fits the tone of the book a lot better than say Deodato or Land, or any of those others.

Look at Team Fortress 2. They use a similar 60's sleek vibe for their game, and people love it.

I can get the knee jerk reaction from people, but I think opening your minds to different styles might be a lot better than trying to make everything feel the same manufactured look. Then everything would look exactly like the Marvel Movies, and then creativity would die after a while.

I really don't have much to say that I haven't already said. Again, I'm glad they are trying new things, but this just doesn't appeal to me. If it appeals to you, more power to ya, but I like the modern look of things.

Also, I don't care for Team Fortress. I really don't get the infatuation.

Okay, Glad we can agree.

Personally? I'm all for this book. Comprised of mostly females and Scott Lang hunting down Doom for what he did to Cassie? SOLD! I just hope a lot of other people buy it too.

@Cafeterialoca:

We will see. It seems to be a love it or hate it sort of thing...with most people leaning towards the hate it.

@PsychoKnights: At least it's not ANOTHER book focused on Cap, Wolverine, Spider-Man, Hulk, Thor and Iron Man. God, I can't wait til they get movies of other characters out so we don't have to be stuck with those 6 controlling all stories.

I think they look fantastic.

There's iZombie in my FF!

Ant-Man's pose looks...incredibly awkward

what the hell.... really really poor choices all around FF used to be awesome but now.... gross

awesome stuff

Why are there 2 FFs and no Inhumans?

All the people here who are immediately writing this off are either young, boring, or both.

I like David Finch, Steve McNiven and the Tony Daniel's of the world too, but variety is the spice of life.

Not everything needs to be super grim and realistic in tone. These are comic books after all.